Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2010, 12:12 PM
 
59,053 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14285

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
It is not two conflicting laws. Telling teens not to have sex but if you do have sex protect yourself is not encouraging sex.
I guess you didn't read the article. "Southworth warned that teaching a student how to properly use contraceptives would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a misdemeanor punishable by up to nine months behind bars and a $10,000 fine."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-11-2010, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
I guess you didn't read the article. "Southworth warned that teaching a student how to properly use contraceptives would be contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a misdemeanor punishable by up to nine months behind bars and a $10,000 fine."
I did read the article, the idea that teaching a student how to use contraceptives contributes to the delinquency of a minor is garbage. Its a bunch of bs, the DA made up because the state policy doesn't conform to his extremist viewpoint.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 01:53 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,739,062 times
Reputation: 49248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
I did read the article, the idea that teaching a student how to use contraceptives contributes to the delinquency of a minor is garbage. Its a bunch of bs, the DA made up because the state policy doesn't conform to his extremist viewpoint.
you are right, it doesn't lead to delinquency, that is a stretch, but if he was told not to teach whatever, he shouldn't teach it. this is not taking sides on the sex education issue, that is another subject for another time.

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 01:55 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
It is not two conflicting laws. Telling teens not to have sex but if you do have sex protect yourself is not encouraging sex.
That's like telling a teen don't use drugs but if you do, here's how to safely use them. Either it is ok or it is not! Our teens are getting conflicting messages about sex and society constantly drills it in their heads that it is natural to give in and abstinence is unrealistic so of course they are going to go for the condom (which isn't 100% effective).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
you are right, it doesn't lead to delinquency, that is a stretch, but if he was told not to teach whatever, he shouldn't teach it. this is not taking sides on the sex education issue, that is another subject for another time.

Nita
He isn't being told not to teach whatever. In fact the state policy calls for comprehensive sex education to be taught in districts that teach sex education. The DA is making threats to arrest teachers who follow state policy because he personally disagrees with the state policy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
That's like telling a teen don't use drugs but if you do, here's how to safely use them. Either it is ok or it is not! Our teens are getting conflicting messages about sex and society constantly drills it in their heads that it is natural to give in and abstinence is unrealistic so of course they are going to go for the condom (which isn't 100% effective).
Its not giving teens conflicting messages. Its teaching gives safety, abstinence is stressed in all of these types of classes. Its like telling teens not to drink and leaving it at that, without mentioning anything about not driving if you indeed drink.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 03:35 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,782,788 times
Reputation: 2772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Opt IN is the ONLY option that would prevent a child from being taught sex ed against the wishes of their parents as the opt-out notice may not reach the parent in time. In the case of sex ed, parental rights trumps the schools rights.
Keeping your child ignorant isn't your entitlement. The school doesn't have rights, it has a mandate to educate. This is how conservatives have become what they claim to be against and their position loses all credibility. It's not that conservative values have no validity, it's the way y'all go about things and the utter contempt you have for the civilization that puts bread on your table. Meaning to live with your head in the sand and keeping your children there forever isn't sustainable.

Perhaps in the true spirit of conservative values someone should tally up the bill how much your lifestyle costs the rest of us. Mom didn't teach you how to do a self breast exam, you don't want to teach your daughter to be responsible for her own health, and now everyone's insurance goes up to cure your 100k cancer. The party of accountability and personal responsibility you say?

I went out of my way to afford you the respect of your religious beliefs and rights as parent, but you breezed past the option to take responsibility for your own children by burdening the system to appease your personal sensibilities. Why should anyone have tolerance or patience for any group (islamic, black, christian, gay- whatever group you want to insert in there) that won't oblige itself the same respect for all?

Mac- I'd ask you to answer that directly for a change. When y'all get yourselves in the business of being fair and negotiating in good faith, people might be willing to take your arguments seriously. This is coming from the middle btw, not the liberal you've been conditioned to believe is the source of all misery on the planet.

Just once I'd love to see a PTA meeting trashed with entitled parents blaming the world why Johnny can't read... let the speaker announce the meeting for parents who are responsible for their children is being relocated to another room and leave these idiots pointing at one another forever. This nonsense is played out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 03:43 PM
 
Location: The Chatterdome in La La Land, CaliFUNia
39,031 posts, read 23,020,628 times
Reputation: 36027
Quote:
Originally Posted by harborlady View Post
Keeping your child ignorant isn't your entitlement. The school doesn't have rights, it has a mandate to educate. This is how conservatives have become what they claim to be against and their position loses all credibility. It's not that conservative values have no validity, it's the way y'all go about things and the utter contempt you have for the civilization that puts bread on your table. Meaning to live with your head in the sand and keeping your children there forever isn't sustainable.
Yeah well the educational system is failing in its mandate to educate. The graduates that are coming out of our public school systems are coming out ignorant, illiterate and unable to think for themselves. But hey, they know how to insert a condom unto a cucumber. *claps* You gripe about tax payers and insurance carriers paying more because conservatives don't want the public schools to teach sexual education, which amounts to a morality issue and not just a biological function? How much are we paying for welfare because many adults are leaving the school systems illiterate and unable to hold down a job because liberals educrats wasted so much time teaching about sex ed, diversity sensitivity, gay/lesbian rights and other things when our children cannot READ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 04:49 PM
 
1,476 posts, read 2,024,949 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
That's like telling a teen don't use drugs but if you do, here's how to safely use them. Either it is ok or it is not! Our teens are getting conflicting messages about sex and society constantly drills it in their heads that it is natural to give in and abstinence is unrealistic so of course they are going to go for the condom (which isn't 100% effective).
Well stated and very true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2010, 04:50 PM
 
1,476 posts, read 2,024,949 times
Reputation: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chatteress View Post
Yeah well the educational system is failing in its mandate to educate. The graduates that are coming out of our public school systems are coming out ignorant, illiterate and unable to think for themselves. But hey, they know how to insert a condom unto a cucumber. *claps* You gripe about tax payers and insurance carriers paying more because conservatives don't want the public schools to teach sexual education, which amounts to a morality issue and not just a biological function? How much are we paying for welfare because many adults are leaving the school systems illiterate and unable to hold down a job because liberals educrats wasted so much time teaching about sex ed, diversity sensitivity, gay/lesbian rights and other things when our children cannot READ?
Another well stated, true, albeit sad, post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top