Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Northeast Ohio
571 posts, read 943,885 times
Reputation: 443

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Do the people who make that argument claim those are acceptable behaviors? If not, then your argument doesn't contest them.

Or are you simply stating that because others already are destroying it, people should just accept it and turn the valve wide open?
Do you think that adultery should be illegal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:13 PM
 
1,461 posts, read 1,529,941 times
Reputation: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
Just abolish all state sponsored marriage.

Marriage is a religious institution, and its something that should be done by your church.

The state can just give out civil unions, or partnerships.
That makes sense and should, but will not, satisfy conservatives who say they want the govt. out of their lives, but really love it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:15 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,462,787 times
Reputation: 9596
Quote:
Originally Posted by UntamedOhioan View Post
Do you think that adultery should be illegal?
Adultery IS illegal in some states in the USA.

It's a felony in Michigan.

http://www.sherlockpi.com/infidelity...ultery-law.php
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:19 PM
 
Location: Northeast Ohio
571 posts, read 943,885 times
Reputation: 443
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
Adultery IS illegal in some states in the USA.

It's a felony in Michigan.

Michigan Adultery Law
How enforceable is that, though? It's like that one law that makes it illegal to bite out of another person's cheeseburger.

"911? Yes, my husband cheated on me! Come and arrest him! Send the whole damn police force AND the sheriff!"

I can guarantee you'd get more than a few laughs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:25 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,958,517 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by UntamedOhioan View Post
Do you think that adultery should be illegal?
Illegal? Not really, shunned, looked down on, yes.

This isn't an issue of legality, it is an issue of proper definition.

Civil union is appropriate. Marriage is not, in fact it makes no sense without confusing the definition and considering its relevance legally, it is important that proper definition is recognized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:28 PM
 
Location: Partisanship Is An Intellectual/Emotional Handicap
1,851 posts, read 2,154,766 times
Reputation: 1082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Do the people who make that argument claim those are acceptable behaviors? If not, then your argument doesn't contest them.

Or are you simply stating that because others already are destroying it, people should just accept it and turn the valve wide open?
I contend that a homosexual's marriage, what they do and how it works out; has absolutely no bearing or reflection on the marriages of hetrosexuals.

In fact there are and always have been many, many long-term, life-long homsexual couples who remain loyal, faithful and commited to each other.

Just as there are and always have been hetro couples who do the same.

And both groups have their share of people who live a lifestyle of wild, promiscuous sexual exploits.

What others do in their marriages has no bearing on your individual marriages and the commitment and loyalty that may or may not exist. The only sanctity of marriage that exists, exists between each individual couple and hpw seriously they take their vows. What your neighbor and his wife do, have no reflection or bearing on your marriage.

To claim otherwise is pure nonsense.


Are you, as a hetrosexual, affected by homosexual's choice and methods of their sexual acts?

Does that make you a homosexual, because they do what they do? Does it some how reflect on your hetrosexual sexual acts or represent in any way or form your sexual lifestyle?

No, of course not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:35 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,958,517 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMyTree View Post
I contend that a homosexual's marriage, what they do and how it works out; has absolutely no bearing or reflection on the marriages of hetrosexuals.

In fact there are and always have been many, many long-term, life-long homsexual couples who remain loyal, faithful and commited to each other.

Just as there are and always have been hetro couples who do the same.

And both groups have their share of people who live a lifestyle of wild, promiscuous sexual exploits.

What others do in their marriages has no bearing on your individual marriages and the commitment and loyalty that may or may not exist. The only sanctity of marriage that exists, exists between each individual couple and hpw seriously they take their vows. What your neighbor and his wife do, have no reflection or bearing on your marriage.

To claim otherwise is pure nonsense.


Are you, as a hetrosexual, affected by homosexual's choice and methods of their sexual acts?

Does that make you a homosexual, because they do what they do? Does it some how reflect on your hetrosexual sexual acts or represent in any way or form your sexual lifestyle?

No, of course not.

Its not marriage. Homosexuals do not create bloodlines, they do not create a family tree. They can never do such, ever. This is the definition of marriage, not love. Many marriages were arranged with disregard for love.

None of your points mean anything in terms of my argument. /shrug
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Partisanship Is An Intellectual/Emotional Handicap
1,851 posts, read 2,154,766 times
Reputation: 1082
Quote:
Originally Posted by newhandle View Post
That makes sense and should, but will not, satisfy conservatives who say they want the govt. out of their lives, but really love it.
Conservatives want the government out of their lives, when it comes to their own selfish topics and reasons.

But they sure as hell are all for supporting, advocating and pushing the government to get involved in every issue or topic that they, themselves, want the government involved in.

They're hypocrites.

Any conservatives turning down Social Security when they retire or when they suffer a life-changing and physically disabling injury or illness? Oh no, they most certainly will not. They'll take evey penny they can get and scream for more.


And I certainly know plenty of Repubs/Conservatives who were more than happy to collect foodstamps/EBT, Welfare and/or Medicaid. Oh no, when they are in need or their loved ones are in need; they certainly find justifications for it and collect the money/support.

They are full of sh*t.

Last edited by NMyTree; 04-22-2010 at 05:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:44 PM
 
289 posts, read 311,437 times
Reputation: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Illegal? Not really, shunned, looked down on, yes.

This isn't an issue of legality, it is an issue of proper definition.

Civil union is appropriate. Marriage is not, in fact it makes no sense without confusing the definition and considering its relevance legally, it is important that proper definition is recognized.
And what should I consider "proper" definition, and what is the basis of said definition?

Because, you know, the definition of "marriage" has never, ever, ever been changed....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-22-2010, 05:45 PM
 
Location: Partisanship Is An Intellectual/Emotional Handicap
1,851 posts, read 2,154,766 times
Reputation: 1082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Its not marriage. Homosexuals do not create bloodlines, they do not create a family tree. They can never do such, ever. This is the definition of marriage, not love.
There are hundreds of thousands of hetrosexual couples who make a conscience choice to not have children. They end their own bloodline, right there. They create no future family tree.

So by your unique definition, they are not in marriages. Despite having gone through the motions of getting married, right?

How absurd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:56 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top