Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2013, 06:34 AM
 
1,203 posts, read 1,243,563 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSD610 View Post
Yes and I still don't see why it would matter. It is still a house and the house itself had nothing to do with what was done by those who lived there. If someone is so scared their potential home is tainted in some way they should just build a brand new shiny pretty and be done with it. I can guess though, that property they build on will at some point have had someone buried on it.
It matters because in some states if one were to buy it, then put it on the market again a year later, one would have to disclose the house's history to potential buyers. In that situation, it doesn't matter what one believes, it matters what the potential buyers might believe.

And since such houses have a harder time selling, even at a lower price, one might potentially take a loss.

That's why it matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2013, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,316 posts, read 14,932,402 times
Reputation: 10411
Disclosure of a stigmatized house varies state by state. In RI, for example, no disclosure is required.

We have houses here dating from the 17th century in which many people have died!!! Plus, who know what goes on in the confines of a home?

Personally, it would make zero difference to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 07:06 AM
 
Location: under the beautiful Carolina blue
22,681 posts, read 36,846,374 times
Reputation: 19929
The Cleveland house was demolished to keep sickos from taking pieces of it as souvenirs. The place that did the demo REALLY demolished it, destroying everything that was in it to the point of being unrecognizable to prevent the ghouls from descending.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Manchester Township, NJ
474 posts, read 1,261,592 times
Reputation: 319
When we were looking for a house several years ago, I happened to ask real estate agents if they have to disclose anything like paranormal activities, murders etc. They said yes, it should be in the disclosure.

BTW, I grew up in a "haunted house" and know sometimes weird stuff can go on. And I don't believe in spirits or demons or whatever. All I can tell is that something, under certain conditions can occur for which we do not as yet have an explanation.

I sure would want to know if a murder or suicide occurred in a house I was considering. People dying from old age, etc., in a house would not be a concern. But highly emotional goings on--well, it would give me pause.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Durham, NC
797 posts, read 3,582,938 times
Reputation: 1417
In NC none of this would have to be disclosed. They are not material facts relating to the property itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Needham, MA
8,547 posts, read 14,050,582 times
Reputation: 7944
Quote:
Originally Posted by DecayingAngel View Post
When we were looking for a house several years ago, I happened to ask real estate agents if they have to disclose anything like paranormal activities, murders etc. They said yes, it should be in the disclosure.
It depends on the state. Here in MA, we do not have to disclose such things. All agents have a duty to be honest though. So, if it's important to you to know you can ask and you should get an honest answer. In the last 50 years, there's only been one murder in my town. While I know exactly which house it happened in (the father of a friend was the victim), I would doubt most other residents in the town would know which house it was or even remember it happening too well and the crime just happened a few years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 09:05 AM
 
Location: St Thomas, US Virgin Islands
24,665 posts, read 69,757,846 times
Reputation: 26728
I was born and raised in Europe and lived in many homes which were hundreds of years old. I'm sure their walls saw many a death and even heinous crimes committed within them. I can see the point of a house being "stigmatized" in some cases but, on previous threads along the same lines, some have expressed the opinion that they would never, ever, live in any house in which someone had died even of natural causes. Each to his own but obviously a line has to be drawn somewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 11:33 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma
6,811 posts, read 6,958,413 times
Reputation: 20971
Death is a natural occurrence. Anyone living in a house that has some age to it probably has a history of a death occurring in it. The problem isn't the death, but the negative emotions that accompany some deaths, or traumatic events. A lot of highly charged negative emotions, like constant fighting and arguing will leave a trace of itself behind, IMO. I believe there are "bad luck houses", where nothing goes right for its occupants, and it is often a case of the negative energy that is present.

Not everyone is sensitive to this, but I believe it exists. Disclosure of extremely negative events that happened in the house is important, so the potential buyers can determine for themselves if it is something they can live with or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,046 posts, read 28,500,220 times
Reputation: 9470
In Idaho, not only is disclosure not necessary, but if asked directly, the seller is allowed to refuse to answer. Of course if you say "I'm not going to respond to that question", that sort of answers the question by itself. But still. There is absolutely no obligation for the seller or the agent to disclose this, and in fact the agent can get in trouble for disclosing it without seller permission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2013, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Just south of Denver since 1989
11,833 posts, read 34,465,367 times
Reputation: 8991
Everyone has a right to live where they want.

I once sold a new house to a lovely couple, from a dirt start. The house next door was also under construction. We were at "our" for an electrical inspection when their was an accident at the other house. A framer lost his footing and fell to his death.

After both houses closed the new neighbor came over and told my client they always buy new houses - so it couldn't be haunted.

My clients told me they didn't have the heart to tell him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top