Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: Halfway between Number 4 Privet Drive and Forks, WA
1,516 posts, read 4,591,098 times
Reputation: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by stosh
Nope. No need to. Recommend you open up a dictionary and find the definition of quantify and intangible. While you are at it, look up qualitative.
Can you look up "denial"???
How about "one trick pony"?
Better yet, buy a house in Alaska. Then buy one in CA. Then sell them both. And report to us which one you made more profit on and why you think that is...
I swore I wasn't going to do this. And really, this is it for me. I really like most of your posts but in this case you're just wanting to beat your old same, dead horse.
Not at all. I'm trying to provide some insights into economics, and offer an explanation for the sustained price growth in San Diego.
My explanation as to why the San Diego market has appreciated between 1970 and 2000 has nothing to do with my own interests. I have no interest in buying in San Diego, and even if I did, it wouldn't matter to me whether climate or economic growth drove that appreciation.
My problem with your theory is not that it goes against my personal interests (it has nothing to do with them), it is that your theory doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
AGAIN, the only way prices can increase, is if there is more money available per square foot, and that requires economic growth. Sure, the economic growth could be driven by population increase, but if this was all there were to it, everyone who lived in New York and Chicago would be moving to Baltimore.
Better yet, buy a house in Alaska. Then buy one in CA. Then sell them both. And report to us which one you made more profit on and why you think that is...
I just read your location and spit out my coffee laughing.
Better yet, buy a house in Alaska. Then buy one in CA. Then sell them both. And report to us which one you made more profit on and why you think that is...
This statement makes absolutely no sense.
You are losing it PG.
Location: Halfway between Number 4 Privet Drive and Forks, WA
1,516 posts, read 4,591,098 times
Reputation: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by stosh
This statement makes absolutely no sense.
You are losing it PG.
You wish, Stosh
(I'm ever more dubious than you can imagine )
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
)
