Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Up above the world so high!
45,218 posts, read 100,681,934 times
Reputation: 40199

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by capitol View Post
A child molester infringes on someone elses rights. He can gawk all he wants at a distance, but he crosses the line when he infringes on the childs rights. Someone playing the field doesn't infringe on anyone's right. In fact its not morally wrong at all unless he is in a exclusive relationship, but if he's not in one, there is no problem playing the field. That is what evolution is telling his body to do.
My point is, the reasoning part of your brain should have more control over you than "evolution".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:40 PM
 
1,304 posts, read 2,575,014 times
Reputation: 1840
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovesMountains View Post
My point is, the reasoning part of your brain should have more control over you than "evolution".
But that is what condoms are for. They take out the risk. Other than that, I don't see why going after multiple women is a bad thing. I don't see people bashing fatties for having horrible impulse control and doing activities that will harm their body. A player isn't harming himself or anyone as long as he is wearing a condom and is not in an exclusive relationship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:46 PM
 
17,869 posts, read 20,988,473 times
Reputation: 13949
Quote:
Originally Posted by capitol View Post
But that is what condoms are for. They take out the risk. Other than that, I don't see why going after multiple women is a bad thing. I don't see people bashing fatties for having horrible impulse control and doing activities that will harm their body. A player isn't harming himself or anyone as long as he is wearing a condom and is not in an exclusive relationship.
So I'd like to know when condoms were 100% guaranteed to not get a woman pregnant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:50 PM
 
1,259 posts, read 1,835,374 times
Reputation: 1141
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJenkins602 View Post
Sounds cool. I myself am learning to listen to my gut. I'm not all that developed in that area. I only tend to pick up on "danger."

There are certain people that I easily open up around. At the same time, there are certain people that I just clam up around depending on the energy that I'm sensing.
Sounds pretty developed to me So long as you listen to the energy that you are picking up on you should do just fine, as I am sure you have. I went against the grain of my gut ONE time bc like a fool, I just wanted to test it, it was inevitably one of the poorest choices I have ever made. No regrets, but Neva.again. I only need to touch the stove eye once to learn my lesson. Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,617,448 times
Reputation: 16395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince_Frog View Post
So I'd like to know when condoms were 100% guaranteed to not get a woman pregnant.
You can also still catch/spread HPV and herpes by skin contact that the condom doesn't cover. Considering most men will never know they had/have HPV, but the women who catch it can get cervical cancer, I'd say that's a pretty big risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:59 PM
 
1,304 posts, read 2,575,014 times
Reputation: 1840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince_Frog View Post
So I'd like to know when condoms were 100% guaranteed to not get a woman pregnant.
And thats what birth control is for too. If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant, she doesn't get pregnant. it's no coincidence that its the reckless ones who get unplanned pregnancies. You don't see white careerist chicks (Ie: lawyers, bankers, etc.) getting pregnant in their 20's when they don't want to be pregnant. It's because they are cautious and really don't want to get pregnant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 05:59 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,134,340 times
Reputation: 46680
I always love questions that begin with "Why do men" or "Why do women" because I know some wild, sweeping generalization is about to follow. As if members of both sexes don't behave in almost identical ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 06:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
7,844 posts, read 13,229,550 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by capitol View Post
But that is what condoms are for. They take out the risk. Other than that, I don't see why going after multiple women is a bad thing. I don't see people bashing fatties for having horrible impulse control and doing activities that will harm their body. A player isn't harming himself or anyone as long as he is wearing a condom and is not in an exclusive relationship.
Wow, ignorance IS bliss. Please do some STD research then report back with your findings. You do realize condoms are not guaranteed protection against anything, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
7,844 posts, read 13,229,550 times
Reputation: 9247
Quote:
Originally Posted by capitol View Post
And thats what birth control is for too. If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant, she doesn't get pregnant. it's no coincidence that its the reckless ones who get unplanned pregnancies. You don't see white careerist chicks (Ie: lawyers, bankers, etc.) getting pregnant in their 20's when they don't want to be pregnant. It's because they are cautious and really don't want to get pregnant.
WHAT?!? Good Lord. "White careerist chick??"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-14-2012, 06:08 PM
 
17,869 posts, read 20,988,473 times
Reputation: 13949
Quote:
Originally Posted by capitol View Post
And thats what birth control is for too. If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant, she doesn't get pregnant. it's no coincidence that its the reckless ones who get unplanned pregnancies. You don't see white careerist chicks (Ie: lawyers, bankers, etc.) getting pregnant in their 20's when they don't want to be pregnant. It's because they are cautious and really don't want to get pregnant.

All protection helps, but there is no 100% guaranteed protection on anything other than abstinence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top