Why are some women relegated to booty call status (loving, Latin, casual)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The man can do all the "relegating" he wants to, a man can only treat a woman like a piece of meat if she allows it. If a woman is good enough for you to be physically intimate with her and possibly impregnate her with your seed, then she should be good enough to be taken out on dates and introduced as your woman. If you don't agree then stop being so cheap, using women for free sex. If you need sex that bad stop preying on normal women and go hire a call girl for yourself. Because every woman you play, every woman you lie to, seduce and abandon? Karma will be back for YOU, jack!
By the same token, every woman who is lied to, seduced, and abandoned deserved it, due to her misdeeds in this life and those previous. I've noticed a lot of people like to think of karma as cosmic revenge for the bad stuff that happens to them, without considering the full ramifications.
Women become booty calls, when they allow it. If a guy can have sex with a woman, without the typical effort, he will take advantage of it. It may just be psychological, but when a woman allows it to happen, a male tends to feel she isn't worthy of g/f status. It has nothing to do with lying or being a player, because sometimes, a woman chooses to be a booty call, many times after a break up.
Look at it this way, it's almost like the girl, who has a guy friend, that she has zero interest in being anything other than friends. She knows he wants to have sex with her, be her boyfriend, yet she will never let that happen. He will do everything with her, except the sex, he is "friend zoned"..... Is this wrong? IMO, it is not, the guy is enabling the female to use him for what she wants, and he sticks with her in dire hopes of getting his chance.
A booty call, serves the same purpose, except, she is used for sex, not the "relationship", the only difference between the woman getting what she wants from the guy, and the guy getting what he wants from the female is sex. People have a hang up on this fact, but in truth, in both instances, someone is just getting what they want out of the relationship, and the other person is enabling it.
The idea that men are the sole instigators of sex-on-demand "relationships" is not only a sexist idea, it is also not factual. Women make this choice, some clearly and openly for their own benefit; some not so much...for whatever reason. If a woman has made this choice and is unhappy about it, she can change her mind.
But why are you having sex with people who aren't your type?
Not having sex with someone because you prefer brunettes over blondes or medium boobs compared to huge boobs is a pretty dumb reason for a guy not to smash a girl. That's why.
Not having sex with someone because you prefer brunettes over blondes or medium boobs compared to huge boobs is a pretty dumb reason for a guy not to smash a girl. That's why.
But it's not dumb to decide someone you're happy to have sex with isn't relationship material just because they don't have your ideal hair color or boob size?
But it's not dumb to decide someone you're happy to have sex with isn't relationship material just because they don't have your ideal hair color or boob size?
Nope. I feel a relationship has a better chance of survival when both parties are the same type for the other person (or very close to it.)
Why would I want to be with someone whom I don't want to stare at all the time and smile?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.