Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:16 AM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,302,265 times
Reputation: 26573

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kings Gambit View Post
Exactly. Which is why I would love to see lawmakers make it a FEDERAL crime and TREASON for women who take advantage of soldiers. This includes divorce and cheating while on deployment. Too many scumbags out there trying to take advantage of our soldiers so we need to make sure we do what we can to take care of them.
Now, to be fair, sometimes people just cannot cope with a deployment and they went into a marriage with the best of intentions.


I'd really like to see financial protections in place for deployed soldiers, though.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:19 AM
 
Location: SoCal again
20,770 posts, read 20,007,648 times
Reputation: 43186
So does that mean that every girl who is attracted to anybody in the military is assumed to be a gold digger right away even though there really is no gold if it is a regular enlisted guy?

Housing and healthcare is nice to have, but that's about it. Gold diggers are much better off marrying a rich old guy who provides a manions instead of a townhouse and some real $$$$.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 11:51 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,020,723 times
Reputation: 40635
Why would someone be attracted to a certain profession of men anyway?

Or women for that matter.

I thought most people are attracted to individuals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:03 PM
 
Location: San Bernandino, CA
245 posts, read 219,672 times
Reputation: 324
I would be wary of anyone looking for someone who works some specific job.

Groupie or fetish sounds like to me... like women attracted to cops and firefighters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:21 PM
 
9,000 posts, read 10,190,447 times
Reputation: 14526
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSmith357 View Post
I would be wary of anyone looking for someone who works some specific job.

Groupie or fetish sounds like to me... like women attracted to cops and firefighters


Idk....I call it a turn on if I meet a guy who's a Marine, not so much a fetish.

But on the other hand- you could not pay me to ever, ever date a cop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:29 PM
 
Location: SoCal again
20,770 posts, read 20,007,648 times
Reputation: 43186
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeSmith357 View Post
I would be wary of anyone looking for someone who works some specific job.

Groupie or fetish sounds like to me... like women attracted to cops and firefighters

It is not much different as dating only blondes or skinny people ...

It is a preference like any other.

I never intended to get involved with a military guy. It just happened. However, after my failed marriage with a military guy, I must say I have started to like the lifestyle and would prefer military over many other professions. I have gone on military dating pages because I think I was a good military wife (but I am dating a non military guy now).
It has nothing to do with health insurance or the lousy housing money. I would do much better moneywise hanging out in Malibu and hunting down some millionaires. I just like the military lifestyle and miss it a little now that I am away from it.I get a little bit of weak knees every time I see a guy in uniform.

But I agree that the OP sounds a little sketchy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:33 PM
 
Location: San Bernandino, CA
245 posts, read 219,672 times
Reputation: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh-eve View Post
It is not much different as dating only blondes or skinny people ...

It is a preference like any other.
I disagree. "blondes" and "brunettes" are a huge demographic. While a specific trait, not too specific.

Saying you dig only blondes, or gingers does not come off as creepy. Saying you dig just someone who performs a specific job role does. Comes across as very "fetishy" to me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Vail, CO
957 posts, read 1,061,415 times
Reputation: 1108
It really amuses me that some women pick men based on professions. I work with all kinds of different people, our job is the only thing we have even remotely in common. I know a lot of retired military people from previous jobs that hired a lot of them. Some of them are really fun that are free thinkers while others are brainwashed tools that can't use the restroom unless they are instructed to do so.

Everyone is different! What does a career path have to do with anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:35 PM
 
Location: San Bernandino, CA
245 posts, read 219,672 times
Reputation: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by believe007 View Post
Idk....I call it a turn on if I meet a guy who's a Marine, not so much a fetish.
I would just say you had poor taste or liked dumb guys.

It's just like guys I used to know who said they loved to date strippers...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-20-2015, 12:39 PM
 
5,121 posts, read 6,810,844 times
Reputation: 5833
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh-eve View Post
So does that mean that every girl who is attracted to anybody in the military is assumed to be a gold digger right away even though there really is no gold if it is a regular enlisted guy?

Housing and healthcare is nice to have, but that's about it. Gold diggers are much better off marrying a rich old guy who provides a manions instead of a townhouse and some real $$$$.
I know, right? When I married my (now) he was an E-2. Trust me, it was a downgrade to my lifestyle. First off, I earned a lot more than my ex, so my "average" income dropped when I married him. And I already had great benefits at my old job (that I had to leave to move to his new duty station) and I lived in a nice place (the base housing was okay, but it "wasn't all that.")

I would find it pretty hilarious to be called a gold digger. Then again, I also didn't "seek out" a military man like the OP is talking about. Honestly, it seems kind of weird to me.

When you marry a military man, your life gets turned upside down. Long deployments, you have to move all the time (and give up your job and your friends each time), the military considers you kind of second class/a dependent, and the "benefits" aren't all that great IMO. And even if you think the long deployments won't bug you, they will... and they come with other consequences besides just being apart (like worry for his safety!) You can get better benefits in the private sector (but if you marry military, good luck getting one of those jobs because it's hard to get someone to hire you when your resume has you at a new company every two years).

Being married to a military man set me back on a lot... my career, when I can retire (because of lost savings due to unemployment between duty stations), my life (I missed out on a lot back home while following him around the globe). And in the end, he left me just two months after he separated from the military. In a lot of ways, I was just part of his military life and when he was no longer in the military, he no longer needed me. So, in the end, for me, it was all for nothing.

Don't marry military because you want to marry a military man. Marry a military man because you want and love him for who *he* is as a man, despite the fact that he's in the military.

Last edited by jillabean; 01-20-2015 at 12:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top