Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2015, 12:07 PM
 
Location: between Mars and Venus
1,748 posts, read 1,297,811 times
Reputation: 2471

Advertisements

Most couples with these "in the name of love" tattoos usually and often ended up in break ups. It's stupid and tattoos are ugly as you get old. However, I don't mind if my love one tattoo my name but I wouldn't. :P
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2015, 01:15 PM
 
57 posts, read 63,435 times
Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackandgold51 View Post
Does tattoo means true love?
It means someone is a true idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:16 PM
 
3,051 posts, read 3,282,606 times
Reputation: 3959
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarshallV84 View Post
My BIL has a huge tat on his chest that has my sisters name on it. I think it's beyond stupid. He's a good guy all, but whenever I see him without his shirt on I just roll my eyes. It's definitely cringeworthy.

I think I'm the only 30 year old person I know who doesn't have a tattoo. I've never seen the appeal of them, it's crazy how many women were turned off because I didn't have any when I dated. My girlfriend has a few, but they're all hidden and pretty small. No Ex boyfriend names thankfully. Haha.
Honestly I wish I could remove mine. I only have two, one on my ankle and one just below my right collarbone. I got them when I was 17 and 22, respectively, and before everyone and his/her mother had them. Now I know 40 year old mothers who keep getting tattoos. I don't understand it. I can see if they genuinely see a work of art so beautiful that they want to get it tatttooed on them, or if it has such sentimental value that they must have it on their skin, but most of them are just your regular butterfly/dolphin/heart whatever. It's like they think they will remain cool if they keep getting ink, when really it's plain vanilla at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:23 PM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,288,569 times
Reputation: 26568
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonCountyLiving View Post
Honestly I wish I could remove mine. I only have two, one on my ankle and one just below my right collarbone. I got them when I was 17 and 22, respectively, and before everyone and his/her mother had them. Now I know 40 year old mothers who keep getting tattoos. I don't understand it. I can see if they genuinely see a work of art so beautiful that they want to get it tatttooed on them, or if it has such sentimental value that they must have it on their skin, but most of them are just your regular butterfly/dolphin/heart whatever. It's like they think they will remain cool if they keep getting ink, when really it's plain vanilla at this point.
If it was plain vanilla, people wouldn't freak out over tattoos or say negative things about people just because they have tattoos.

I know a ton of people who got tattoos young who wish they could get rid of them. You can! Or, you could find a talented artist and have them covered with a good tattoo that means something to you as a more mature adult.

I got my first tattoo when I was 36. Not because I thought it would make me seem younger or any of that mess because I never had age issues. I still don't and I'm 47 now.

I got mine then because that's about the time I realized what sort of tattoo I could get and enjoy. One that would have meaning to me. My first husband had 9 tattoos (some very large) and we got married when I was 24, so I'd spent years considering getting a tattoo.

Unfortunately, the artist wasn't very good and it aged poorly. I knew that would happen right after I had it done. When I was 43, I had a better artist tattoo something over it that was a variation on the same theme. That tattoo is gorgeous here years later, and it has grown until it covers most of my calf (it was on my ankle). It's quite huge, but I love it. It's not flash stuff. It was all drawn right onto my leg by a talented artist.

I have another that was drawn in advance that's on my back. Covers about 1/3 of my back, maybe? Close to that.

I can hide mine easily in business clothes. I don't have any butterflies or whatever. I mean, nothing against butterflies, but flash isn't my thing.


No matter your age, crappy tattoos are crappy tattoos. And poor placement is poor placement.

People need to think before they get inked.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:27 PM
 
3,051 posts, read 3,282,606 times
Reputation: 3959
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
If it was plain vanilla, people wouldn't freak out over tattoos or say negative things about people just because they have tattoos.

I know a ton of people who got tattoos young who wish they could get rid of them. You can! Or, you could find a talented artist and have them covered with a good tattoo that means something to you as a more mature adult.

I got my first tattoo when I was 36. Not because I thought it would make me seem younger or any of that mess because I never had age issues. I still don't and I'm 47 now.

I got mine then because that's about the time I realized what sort of tattoo I could get and enjoy. One that would have meaning to me. My first husband had 9 tattoos (some very large) and we got married when I was 24, so I'd spent years considering getting a tattoo.

Unfortunately, the artist wasn't very good and it aged poorly. I knew that would happen right after I had it done. When I was 43, I had a better artist tattoo something over it that was a variation on the same theme. That tattoo is gorgeous here years later, and it has grown until it covers most of my calf (it was on my ankle). It's quite huge, but I love it. It's not flash stuff. It was all drawn right onto my leg by a talented artist.

I have another that was drawn in advance that's on my back. Covers about 1/3 of my back, maybe? Close to that.

I can hide mine easily in business clothes. I don't have any butterflies or whatever. I mean, nothing against butterflies, but flash isn't my thing.


No matter your age, crappy tattoos are crappy tattoos. And poor placement is poor placement.

People need to think before they get inked.
I'm not freaking out. I stand by my statement. It absolutely is plain vanilla to follow a trend with the intention of thinking that you are a "nonconformist."

You obviously aren't the type of person I mean, so I'm not sure why you left the snarky winky face?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:36 PM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,288,569 times
Reputation: 26568
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonCountyLiving View Post
I'm not freaking out. I stand by my statement. It absolutely is plain vanilla to follow a trend with the intention of thinking that you are a "nonconformist."

You obviously aren't the type of person I mean, so I'm not sure why you left the snarky winky face?
On what planet is winking being snarky? Also, who accused you of freaking out?

It just struck me as funny. Tattoos may be more mainstream now than they were 20 years ago, but they're hardly as common as pierced ears, for example.

I think they've not reached "vanilla" yet. Though, I enjoy vanilla and never understood the use of it to indicate blandness.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:47 PM
 
3,051 posts, read 3,282,606 times
Reputation: 3959
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
On what planet is winking being snarky? Also, who accused you of freaking out?

It just struck me as funny. Tattoos may be more mainstream now than they were 20 years ago, but they're hardly as common as pierced ears, for example.

I think they've not reached "vanilla" yet. Though, I enjoy vanilla and never understood the use of it to indicate blandness.
French vanilla ice cream is yummy. Vanilla pudding is also yummy. It's an expression.

Some people use the winky face for snark. It's totally a thing. Sorry if I misunderstood.

I do think tatts are pretty common place now, as least for anyone Gen X and below.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 03:51 PM
 
1,285 posts, read 1,290,477 times
Reputation: 1730
I've got a tattoo that symbolizes my compatibility issues with Libras. I always get asked what it means, which has been a good ice breaker of sorts. Would never put someone's name on my body. A few years ago, I had a tattooed covered, which I don't remember getting, or know what it's supposed to represent.....think hard before getting any tat on yourself....ask anyone with tribal tats...lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 04:44 PM
 
Location: My House
34,941 posts, read 36,288,569 times
Reputation: 26568
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarbonCountyLiving View Post
French vanilla ice cream is yummy. Vanilla pudding is also yummy. It's an expression.

Some people use the winky face for snark. It's totally a thing. Sorry if I misunderstood.

I do think tatts are pretty common place now, as least for anyone Gen X and below.
About 40% of Gen X and millennials have tattoos. I think it's commonplace, but not a majority yet.

I tend to use words for snark. Hehehe.

That "vanilla" thing reminds me of 50 Shades. Which probably accounts for it amusing me. I hated those books.

French Vanilla is tasty!
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2015, 05:05 PM
 
Location: Vail, CO
957 posts, read 1,061,143 times
Reputation: 1108
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
On what planet is winking being snarky? Also, who accused you of freaking out?

It just struck me as funny. Tattoos may be more mainstream now than they were 20 years ago, but they're hardly as common as pierced ears, for example.

I think they've not reached "vanilla" yet. Though, I enjoy vanilla and never understood the use of it to indicate blandness.
Go to Denver/CO. EVERYONE has one. I didn't notice it as much in other areas. It doesn't bother me at all, I just won't get one on myself. I can't really think of anything I'm passionate enough about to get it inked on my body!

My girlfriend has some cute tats, and she really likes them. She doesn't want any more though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top