Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-03-2016, 11:41 AM
 
641 posts, read 406,640 times
Reputation: 795

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
So a very small imbalance that one would not notice with the I when looking at a community or population. I.e. a non factor.

No one would look at a community of roughly 200k (a small city) and go, wow, there are so many more men when there are 100k women and 105k men. No one would notice it, and it would be a non issue in dating.
It leaves 5,000 men surplus. That's one community. Nationwide that's a big number.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-03-2016, 11:42 AM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,077,806 times
Reputation: 26919
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzaa2 View Post
It leaves 5,000 men surplus. That's one community.
But not in one place, at any given time.

You're not standing there at a cocktail party with 4900 other "surplus" men, I'm assuming.

Assuming a total of 200,000 people as described, this is NOT a gigantic dearth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 11:48 AM
 
641 posts, read 406,640 times
Reputation: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
But not in one place, at any given time.

You're not standing there at a cocktail party with 4900 other "surplus" men, I'm assuming.

Assuming a total of 200,000 people as described, this is NOT a gigantic dearth.
But it's part of the wider numbers game and why women have more options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 11:52 AM
 
30,902 posts, read 33,077,806 times
Reputation: 26919
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzaa2 View Post
But it's part of the wider numbers game and why women have more options.
That's ridiculous.

You can't do better than that TINY percentage of men?

A percentage of them will have no job. A percentage will be abusive. A percentage will be incapacitated due to illness. A percentage will be addicted to something. And so on.

These are excuses. Just excuses. There are numbers games, so to speak, everywhere. Everyone has the chips stacked against him or her in some way or other. Nobody has that perfect situation. And dating is hard for a huge, huge percentage of the population, both male and female. You are just making excuses, given the very small discrepancy you're relying on here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 11:58 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,071,979 times
Reputation: 40635
Yeah, and offset that with the huge number of men in prison, or off in the military, and its is absolutely complete a non issue. it isn't noticeable at all.

Sure, in some small communities under specific circumstances it might be noticeable, but even going to a smallish college of 3000 people when it is a 60/40 gender ratio it isn't really noticeable over day to day living.

And F the numbers game excuse. It is not a numbers game. People aren't looking for numbers. They're looking for one, or a few, individuals... racking up more and more numbers isn't going to help you find that person except for dumb luck. It is about targeting your search technique to find that one person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 12:18 PM
 
641 posts, read 406,640 times
Reputation: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
Yeah, and offset that with the huge number of men in prison, or off in the military, and its is absolutely complete a non issue. it isn't noticeable at all.
Men in prison are often married or have girlfriends. Same with the military.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerZ View Post
That's ridiculous.

You can't do better than that TINY percentage of men?

A percentage of them will have no job. A percentage will be abusive. A percentage will be incapacitated due to illness. A percentage will be addicted to something. And so on.

These are excuses. Just excuses. There are numbers games, so to speak, everywhere. Everyone has the chips stacked against him or her in some way or other. Nobody has that perfect situation. And dating is hard for a huge, huge percentage of the population, both male and female. You are just making excuses, given the very small discrepancy you're relying on here.
It's about averages. The average woman will have more options than the average man because there's less of them and more men.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 12:21 PM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 37,071,979 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzaa2 View Post
Men in prison are often married or have girlfriends. Same with the military.
They're not in the dating pool. If they're overseas, or in prison, they're not out at the club looking to meet people, so they don't effect the ratios in the dating community.

But this is silly, these microscopic differences in numbers is completely irrelevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzaa2 View Post
It's about averages. The average woman will have more options than the average man because there's less of them and more men.
Dating is not about averages, be it mean, median or mode. It is about one person and one other person.

If you think that few percent (at best) difference makes a real difference, you're dating wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 02:27 PM
 
1,418 posts, read 1,271,184 times
Reputation: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by zentropa View Post
You felt like committing a violent act against a stranger because how he looked enraged you? You know nothing about him and what he may be dealing with in his private life. You just stereotyped him based on absolutely nothing.

Do you have access to weapons?
He just looked like a cocky and Macho arrogant guy, felt like doing it because I hate how life and Society expect us guys to be the strong confident assertive ones, hate the rules of masculinity
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 02:34 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,268 posts, read 108,310,604 times
Reputation: 116280
Quote:
Originally Posted by MogwaiLover217 View Post
Ya when I was at a bar the other night, I couldn't help but feel like punching this guys lights out, he had a cute blonde girlfriend and he looked kinda cocky macho, reason why I feel like doing that is to release my anger, rage, stress, on how much I hate how us guys are supposed to be the confident ones, be risk-takers, have balls, and my resentment on how us guys are supposed to embrace those qualities, like us guys get criticized when we resent doing that
Mog, chatting someone up isn't that big a risk. If you keep in mind that everyone's looking for a type, and you're just not going to be everyone's type, it's not a big deal. Let it roll off your back. The number of people we could resonate with is very small. You shouldn't have the expectation that every woman, or even half the women, or 1/4 of the women you strike up a casual chat with, will respond to you. If you have that expectation, or if you expect to land some babe, like the next guy over from you at a bar, you're setting yourself up for disappointment, anger, rage. You're doing it to yourself, see? Change your expectations, and life will look differently to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-03-2016, 02:42 PM
 
290 posts, read 214,833 times
Reputation: 385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruth4Truth View Post
Mog, chatting someone up isn't that big a risk. If you keep in mind that everyone's looking for a type, and you're just not going to be everyone's type, it's not a big deal. Let it roll off your back. The number of people we could resonate with is very small. You shouldn't have the expectation that every woman, or even half the women, or 1/4 of the women you strike up a casual chat with, will respond to you. If you have that expectation, or if you expect to land some babe, like the next guy over from you at a bar, you're setting yourself up for disappointment, anger, rage. You're doing it to yourself, see? Change your expectations, and life will look differently to you.
the problem is when you don't seem to be ANYONE'S type.

obviously not everyone will be your type... and thats normal and fine...but then you'd think at some point that you'd come across someone that is.

for a lot of people including myself...mutual attraction is just very very difficult to come by.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top