Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i would say the person doing the leading on. the other person might take it seriously, foolish or not.
the instigator could be some numb nut popping off at the mouth while the aggresor could be the one that just lays him out suddenly out of the blue. like a straight jaw shot.
Just to clarify, I guess what I mean when I say player, is someone looking for a physical relationship only, with little or no responsibility. However, the player must have some emotional attachment to the person they are attracted to, otherwise they wouldn't be attracted period. If that makes sense.
The person leading them on might just give the player the indication that they will get somewhere with this person but in actuality won't.
So in the end, the player (who is still human, and sucesptible to hurt) is mislead b/c they will not obtain the physical relationship with little responsibility they are looking for. Even though he didn't have great intentions for the other person to begin with.
ok, well then if a person is going into it just for fun, then they cant be mad at whatever comes of the situation. the person leading them on is still not being respectful, but thats the nature of the relationship.
you knew i was snake when you picked me up...
Quote:
Originally Posted by linkbr
Just to clarify, I guess what I mean when I say player, is someone looking for a physical relationship only, with little or no responsibility. However, the player must have some emotional attachment to the person they are attracted to, otherwise they wouldn't be attracted period. If that makes sense.
The person leading them on might just give the player the indication that they will get somewhere with this person but in actuality won't.
So in the end, the player (who is still human, and sucesptible to hurt) is mislead b/c they will not obtain the physical relationship with little responsibility they are looking for. Even though he didn't have great intentions for the other person to begin with.
ok, well then if a person is going into it just for fun, then they cant be mad at whatever comes of the situation. the person leading them on is still not being respectful, but thats the nature of the relationship.
you knew i was snake when you picked me up...
In what I know as a "player" they tend to be the ones that lie and connive to make sure the other person does not suspect them as a "player".
So how does your statement ring true that, "they knew you were a snake when they picked you up"??
Thus they did not know you were in it for "fun"
If you are in it for fun dont play with someones heart or life.
Man/Woman Up about it.
You can't have one without the other. One exploits, and other allows himself/herself to be exploited. That means both share blame equally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
who's more wrong?
