Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Interesting point of view; actually stunning in a manner of speaking. Could be some deep truth to that. Hope you don't mind me plagiarizing that in the future.
So basically your god f'ed things up just to prevent his own boredom. What a nice guy.
Why would an all knowing creator get absolutely everything he created wrong and then need to use random and or designed evolution to fix the problem? Why not just create everything perfect first time around?
Either because he is not omniscient and omnipotent. And thus not actually a god.
In reserved evolution the law of segregation has played an important role in humans, we each have produced after our own kind. A human has never given birth to an animal, fish or insect. And conversely science has discovered that no fish, animal or insect has ever given birth to a human; but they don't share that infoirmation.
Every time a human gives birth, it gives birth to an animal. Humans are of the animal kind.
Depends entirely on your perspective; from a biological perspective, we are a class of animal; from a biblical perspective we are complettely different than animals. One can ignore the other perspective, some combine the two. But I favor the biblical. Because it goes back further than biology, and is much more deep than biology.
Depends entirely on your perspective; from a biological perspective, we are a class of animal; from a biblical perspective we are complettely different than animals. One can ignore the other perspective, some combine the two. But I favor the biblical. Because it goes back further than biology, and is much more deep than biology.
Still, we are animals giving birth to animals. I think we are pretty much stuck with that kingdom, biologically speaking, that is.
Still, we are animals giving birth to animals. I think we are pretty much stuck with that kingdom, biologically speaking, that is.
Well I personally disagree with science, its way too broad in its definition of animals, and not distintive enough in its classifications. I don't know if your aware of this, but really science feels if something gets its energy from eating other things and it can move around, well then its an animal, and everythingelse is considered a plant.
And I disagree with that. I think there should be at the least, 4 different classifications; animal, insect, human and plant.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We're just a drop (of DNA) in the old (primordial) bucket...
