Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The total number of joints, according to scientists, is: 1- Skull joints: 86 2- Throat joints: 6 3- Thorax joints: 66 4- Spine and Pelvis joints: 76 5- Upper limbs: 32 x 2 = 64 6- Lower limbs: 31 x 2= 62 Total number of joints: 360
What scientists?...Don't you mean the Koran?...I guess you had better let the medical community know then....They all have it wrong according to you.
Quran describes the stages of the development of the fetus in the womb of its mother and was opposed by the scientists say that the bones and muscles composed at the same time But the Quran says the bones first and then muscle Recently, scientists confirmed what Quran say
And certainly We created man of an extract of clay, Then We made him a small seed in a firm resting-place, Then We made the seed a clot, then We made the clot a lump of flesh, then We made (in) the lump of flesh bones, then We clothed the bones with flesh, then We caused it to grow into another creation, so blessed be Allah, the best of the creators. Sura #23 12:14
What is the definition of proof? How are these proofs? How are specific observations that are NOT linked to Islam proof? All the "proof" that you have given is that the writers of the Koran had a fairly advance knowledge of science for the time period. Sorry, but technically, these are observations that have been confirmed by western scientists. There is a logical fallacy here. Your logic is if one group of scientists of a certain religion get the same results as another group, then Allah is god. Huge logical gap there buddy. So please understand that logical gap and realize that while the things are interesting and kind of cool that people had extensive scientific knowledge, it shows only that. Proof needs to be direct, this is too convoluted to be proof.
What is the definition of proof? How are these proofs? How are specific observations that are NOT linked to Islam proof? All the "proof" that you have given is that the writers of the Koran had a fairly advance knowledge of science for the time period. Sorry, but technically, these are observations that have been confirmed by western scientists. There is a logical fallacy here. Your logic is if one group of scientists of a certain religion get the same results as another group, then Allah is god. Huge logical gap there buddy. So please understand that logical gap and realize that while the things are interesting and kind of cool that people had extensive scientific knowledge, it shows only that. Proof needs to be direct, this is too convoluted to be proof.
actaually this is the proof
mohammed (pbuh) was illiterate raised in desert (arabia) within idolaters society
there was no interrest about science at all
mohammed (pbuh) starts to speak with quran suddenly in his age 40 for 23 years
until the nineteenth century it used to belief that the atom is the smallest thing and that there is nothing smaller than its size and its weight, then the Electrons, and protons, and neutrons were discovered
Those who disbelieve say: The Hour will never come unto us. Say: Nay, by my Lord, but it is coming unto you surely. (He is) the Knower of the Unseen. Not an atom's weight, or less than that or greater, escapeth Him in the heavens or in the earth, but it is in a clear Record, Sura #34:3
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.