Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-03-2010, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach FL
14,617 posts, read 21,571,013 times
Reputation: 6794

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by akck View Post
I don't think TuborgP is thinking LTC insurance will cover those costs. He said in concert, which to me means LTC insurance will maintain his quality of life and if some new breakthrough happens, he'll be able to take advantage of it with his other health insurance.

It's kind of what I'm doing now. I have two bad knees, but I'm not looking a knee replacement surgery. I'm just muddling through, taking an occasional pain med, waiting for some of the recent research breakthroughs to reach the market. Without LTC insurance, TuborgP would have to take the mechanical replacement option (which isn't permanent). With LTC insurance he can wait, giving him the opportunity to use one of the new alternatives.
Now you have me really confused. Most people don't go into SNFs (or even need home health care) for bad knees (at least the kind of bad knees most younger people have). Heck - everyone I know who has led an active life has something or other wrong with one or both knees by the time he or she is 50ish or so. And those who don't fall into this group usually have bad knees because their knees are carrying 50-100+ more pounds than they're supposed to carry.

And although you're correct that a total knee isn't a great option for a younger person (because they haven't been shown to last longer than 20 years or so) - there are now some newer less radical knee surgeries that are designed to buy you some time. But again - this has nothing to do with the price of onions - which is LTC insurance.

So what do you think you'll get with LTC insurance as a result of your bad knees that will "buy you time"? Robyn
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2010, 06:11 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,978,654 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55 View Post
Now you have me really confused. Most people don't go into SNFs (or even need home health care) for bad knees (at least the kind of bad knees most younger people have). Heck - everyone I know who has led an active life has something or other wrong with one or both knees by the time he or she is 50ish or so. And those who don't fall into this group usually have bad knees because their knees are carrying 50-100+ more pounds than they're supposed to carry.

And although you're correct that a total knee isn't a great option for a younger person (because they haven't been shown to last longer than 20 years or so) - there are now some newer less radical knee surgeries that are designed to buy you some time. But again - this has nothing to do with the price of onions - which is LTC insurance.

So what do you think you'll get with LTC insurance as a result of your bad knees that will "buy you time"? Robyn
Not me and I am 55

And I played rugby for 13 years followed by soccer for another 17 years and I have skied for the last 30+ years. Maybe I am just lucky but I have never had a broken bone, ligament or joint problem (touch wood). One has to be careful about generalizing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2010, 06:16 PM
 
31,692 posts, read 41,155,772 times
Reputation: 14446
Retirement: 11 questions on long-term care insurance - Apr. 7, 2010
At a minimum, make sure that the policy can be applied not just to nursing homes but also to licensed home care and assisted living, and that it includes an "alternative plan of care" provision. That last item gives you wiggle room in case medical advances change how long-term care is delivered.

nsurance adds an even bigger buffer, which can be emotionally reassuring for people without kids who can help. But for many purchasers the point is less to guarantee care than it is to preserve assets to pass on, or to protect a spouse's lifestyle.

Financial planner Brian Smith echoes many other advisers when he says to look into a policy if you have assets of at least $250,000, not including your home, to protect.

Having more money, from whatever source, means more options. So at the very least you'll need significant savings to act as a buffer between you and the Medicaid safety net. Michigan college professor Paul Freddolino, 63, and his wife Donna, 52, an educational trainer, opted not to buy insurance. Instead they plan to set aside $75,000 of their savings as a "long-term-care account."

The above is all from the link and is provided as general info for readers if interested as food for thought and not discussion with me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2010, 06:21 PM
 
31,692 posts, read 41,155,772 times
Reputation: 14446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Not me and I am 55

And I played rugby for 13 years followed by soccer for another 17 years and I have skied for the last 30+ years. Maybe I am just lucky but I have never had a broken bone, ligament or joint problem (touch wood). One has to be careful about generalizing.
For the wife and I it is all about a comprehensive approach to future medical needs. As I have posted in other threads that means.
Long Term Health Care
Good Medicare Supplemental
12-15K a year cash flow for medical overage above and beyond your current monthly out of pocket expenses
The recommended Fidelity amount plus even more in reserves.

That is the reserve not instead but on top of LTC

That is moving forward as your base to deal with future needs.

Yes this might not be realistic for all but as I keep saying it is individual in nature.

LTC helps to provide you the base that might make the difference in being able to afford the advanced treatment yet to be developed or to operate under guidelines yet to be administered. Sorta like being 30 and planning for retirement. Yup it was thirty years away but it is here now.

Per the OP and keeping this on topic, one of the shortcomings of calculators is the individual variable and this thread is becoming a discussion about individual variables not related to the OP question of calculators. I apologize for contributing to getting off track.

Last edited by TuborgP; 05-03-2010 at 06:35 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Alaska
5,356 posts, read 18,587,782 times
Reputation: 4072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robyn55 View Post
Now you have me really confused. Most people don't go into SNFs (or even need home health care) for bad knees (at least the kind of bad knees most younger people have). Heck - everyone I know who has led an active life has something or other wrong with one or both knees by the time he or she is 50ish or so. And those who don't fall into this group usually have bad knees because their knees are carrying 50-100+ more pounds than they're supposed to carry.

And although you're correct that a total knee isn't a great option for a younger person (because they haven't been shown to last longer than 20 years or so) - there are now some newer less radical knee surgeries that are designed to buy you some time. But again - this has nothing to do with the price of onions - which is LTC insurance.

So what do you think you'll get with LTC insurance as a result of your bad knees that will "buy you time"? Robyn
You totally missed the point of the analogy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,244 posts, read 57,293,927 times
Reputation: 18639
Good thread.

Offhand I think the main limitations on retirement calculators are:

1. You have to guess at your future rate of return. Small errors here lead to big differences in outcome.

2. You don't know how long you will remain alive in retirement

3. You don't know how your health will be, particularly in the "outyears"

4. If you are not single, you don't know who will outlive whom

5. Maybe the biggest problem - tax laws and other conditions will change in unpredictable ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach FL
14,617 posts, read 21,571,013 times
Reputation: 6794
Quote:
Originally Posted by akck View Post
You totally missed the point of the analogy.
What analogy? Best I can figure out what a couple of you are saying is you're buying LTC insurance so if you need custodial or similar care - you won't have to pay for it out of pocket - and can have some extra money to buy something like a zippy bionic knee when it hits the market (assuming Medicare won't cover the cost). Doesn't make sense IMO. Based on my observations - people who need custodial or similar care aren't really good candidates for things like bionic knees.

And if you are in a SNF - why do you need a bionic knee? IOW - I don't have a clue what types of advanced medical technology you'd be interested in if you were living in a SNF - stuff that Medicare doesn't cover. Can you give me some examples? Robyn

P.S. Only thing my 92 year old father has bought recently not covered by Medicare are zippier than normal lens implants when he had cataract surgery - he paid for the extra cost of the zippier lens implants himself. OTOH - he lives in an independent living facility - and still drives. Not sure a SNF resdient would have appreciated the higher end lens implants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-04-2010, 09:28 PM
 
31,692 posts, read 41,155,772 times
Reputation: 14446
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
Good thread.

Offhand I think the main limitations on retirement calculators are:

1. You have to guess at your future rate of return. Small errors here lead to big differences in outcome.

2. You don't know how long you will remain alive in retirement

3. You don't know how your health will be, particularly in the "outyears"

4. If you are not single, you don't know who will outlive whom

5. Maybe the biggest problem - tax laws and other conditions will change in unpredictable ways.
You can't use just one free calculator and you need to be able to manipulate the variables. Pensions are until death and beyond for spouse if that was an option and SS is until death with the after death options available. Investments are until they run dry. Many calculators give you the option to pick an age to plan until. I have used a recommended age of 94 and wondered what happened to some people if they lived beyond that. Rate of return is one of the great mysteries of life and some are more comfortable than others feeling how much they understand that mystery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 02:35 AM
 
107,387 posts, read 109,774,002 times
Reputation: 80713
we can only plan around what was, what is and what stands a good chance of being. odds say if you do that you probley will be okay.

its alot better then doing it by the seat of your pants with no basis or clue of what the numbers could look like in the future


want to just fly in blind? be my guest but id rather fly in at least with a map of what the terrain could look like... if i had a cola adjusted pension that could support us i wouldnt care but since we dont i need to be armed with as much info as possible
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-05-2010, 06:09 AM
 
31,692 posts, read 41,155,772 times
Reputation: 14446
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
we can only plan around what was, what is and what stands a good chance of being. odds say if you do that you probley will be okay.

its alot better then doing it by the seat of your pants with no basis or clue of what the numbers could look like in the future


want to just fly in blind? be my guest but id rather fly in at least with a map of what the terrain could look like... if i had a cola adjusted pension that could support us i wouldnt care but since we dont i need to be armed with as much info as possible
And that my friend is the difference as you so well state. Our situations as individuals are very different, you and I are of the extremes. Yet we have learned to understand those differences and respect the others perspective because it is pertinent to them if not us. However from what I have read from you, even with a pension for both of you rate of return and figuring it out would still be fun for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top