Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2015, 06:19 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,631,650 times
Reputation: 13630

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coe View Post
Concord has a reputation for being ghetto but I could see it becoming gentrified. Especially with the Naval Yards Redevelopment which will add 25k people mostly upper middle class.
I'm wondering how will be able to develop that area w/that many people as I don't recall seeing any plans to expand Highway 4 or 242. But that would be typical of Bay Area planning I suppose; build homes first and worry about infrastructure later when it's already overburdened.

I kind of debate buying a home in the North Concord area b/c it's relatively affordable. The trashy element isn't that bad I guess and I wonder if it will "gentrify" at all b/c it's pretty much the only area along the 680 corridor with somewhat affordable single family homes. Problem with Concord though is the schools are terrible overall. If they could gentrify the trashy element out of the area and improve the schools it would be great, it's actually a pretty decent location, next two 3 freeways and two BART stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2015, 06:25 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
I think the barrier is it's proximity to Pittsburgh and Antioch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2015, 06:28 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,980 posts, read 32,631,650 times
Reputation: 13630
eh, I don't really see any effects from being closer to those two cities has on the area. The hill creates a pretty defined barrier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2015, 09:25 AM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coe View Post
Probably because of it's proximity to the Silicon Valley but there's a lot of over development in that city. Its starting to resemble Orange County. I was shocked how white many of those cities are most people outside the Bay Area assume the East Bay is the most diverse region of California.
Also I think I read somewhere that Dublin in the fastest growing city in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2015, 09:30 AM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
Census data: 78 counties shifted to majority-minority since 2000 | Economy | McClatchy DC



Contra Costa was one of 78 counties that became majority minority in the last census. The other Bay Area County was San Mateo, and also Sacramento and Stanislaus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2015, 04:46 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
SF Is on Track to Be the Whitest County in the Region By 2040 - The Numbers - Curbed SF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2015, 02:57 PM
 
540 posts, read 652,960 times
Reputation: 766
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-25-2015, 03:43 PM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
The trend I've noticed is the white population growing in both the urban core and extreme exurbs but declining in the more established suburbs. A lot of nicer parts of the out east bay such Lamorinda, Walnut Creek, and Danville may end up resembling Cupertino and Fremont in 30 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2015, 10:57 AM
 
163 posts, read 273,324 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coe View Post
The trend I've noticed is the white population growing in both the urban core and extreme exurbs but declining in the more established suburbs. A lot of nicer parts of the out east bay such Lamorinda, Walnut Creek, and Danville may end up resembling Cupertino and Fremont in 30 years.
So is that supposed to be a bad thing for these areas to change in demographics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-26-2015, 11:32 AM
 
4,031 posts, read 4,459,910 times
Reputation: 1886
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwayDiva View Post
So is that supposed to be a bad thing for these areas to change in demographics?
It's all subjective. I know a lot of working class Latinos resent white hipsters gentrifying the Mission District. On the other hand many middle class whites were priced out of the places like Cupertino by wealthy Asian immigrants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top