Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Dakota
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2008, 05:56 PM
 
2,398 posts, read 5,415,241 times
Reputation: 1562

Advertisements

Does anyone know about this...or better yet have the facts? I've just seen the commercials saying its a bad thing because it's basically a gag law. What's the other side to this?

Update:
I found a link- http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/South_Dakota_Open_and_Clean_Government_Act_(2008 (broken link))
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2008, 06:21 PM
 
27,955 posts, read 39,845,766 times
Reputation: 26197
It pretty much a gag law. If anyone does any sort of business with the goverment on any level its applies. Its a bad deal for anyone who has or may have dealings with the government. This is pretty much spearheaded but folks from outside the state of South Dakota. And as its written may be unconstitutional.

http://www.sdsos.gov/electionsvotere...eanGovtAct.pdf
ASBSD: Stop Initiated Measure 10, Stop the Gag Law (http://dakotawarcollege.com/archives/5034 - broken link)
http://dakotawarcollege.com/?s=IM10&x=0&y=0

The main thing it is going to serve as more of a hinderence to goverment and to the citizens it is supposed to serve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 07:33 PM
 
2,398 posts, read 5,415,241 times
Reputation: 1562
Thank you rjl78. This is what I thought.

Definitely voting NO on this stupid thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 07:47 PM
 
27,955 posts, read 39,845,766 times
Reputation: 26197
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ1986 View Post
Thank you rjl78. This is what I thought.

Definitely voting NO on this stupid thing.
Good. This would be bad if it passes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 09:12 PM
 
2,398 posts, read 5,415,241 times
Reputation: 1562
Anybody else have opinions?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 10:21 PM
 
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
3,941 posts, read 14,729,906 times
Reputation: 2287
I guess I don't really understand what the initiative will cause. Can someone give me the Reader's Digest translation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2008, 08:31 AM
 
Location: So. Dak.
13,495 posts, read 37,481,388 times
Reputation: 15205
OK, this is how it was explained to me. Suppose an educator or a county employee (auditor, treasurer, etc) has a problem and would like to speak to one of our state Reps or Sen. They would not be allowed to if this new law takes effect.

Keep in mind, I have not personally figured it out, but I'm trusting the person who gave me that info.

I have no idea what prompted this bill, but I'm voting against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2008, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
3,941 posts, read 14,729,906 times
Reputation: 2287
OK now I get it. I will be voting against it as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2008, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Sioux Falls
230 posts, read 626,906 times
Reputation: 365
Quote:
Governor Mike Rounds has come out in opposition to the measure, saying that is not well thought out and has the potential to interfere with the political rights of South Dakota citizens. Critics of the governor are not surprised by the his position, considering that the he is one of the "recipient(s) of tens of thousands of dollars of campaign contributions from holders of no-bid contractors, contractors who received tens of millions of dollars back".
This nugget was taken from the website in regards to the opposition of the initiative. While I would be voting NO on this one, you can't help but find the irony in that...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2008, 09:31 AM
 
Location: So. Dak.
13,495 posts, read 37,481,388 times
Reputation: 15205
OK, this sounds much deeper then the simplistic thing I was told.

HELP????? Guess I don't totally understand this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Dakota
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top