Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2008, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Midessa, Texas Home Yangzhou, Jiangsu temporarily
1,506 posts, read 4,281,434 times
Reputation: 992

Advertisements

Here is a question that I like to think about sometimes:

We observe a universe full of stuff. Stuff here is defined as matter, energy, anti-matter, dark matter, time, etc. etc. Basically everything.

What is the origin of stuff?

It seems there are a few possible answers.

1. There actually is no stuff and never has been. It is an illusion. This cannot be correct because if something, in this case me, can ask the question then at the very least the asker ,me, must exist. Also if it is an illusion then the illusion must exist and that would count as stuff. In addition a universe completely devoid of stuff would be just one possibility in an extremely large, maybe infinite, number of possibilities. It would be unlikely for a universe to be completely empty. Based on this, I think we can rule this option out.


2. There has always been stuff. This option doesn't seem very satisfying to me because there is no starting point. How can this be? If the past is infinite then how can we find ourselves in the present? Time must be measurable by some smallest amount, i.e. plank time. But if there are measurable units of time there must be some first unit at which the clock began in order for us to observe ourselves at some point on the continuum of time, i.e. the present. Maybe time is circular and by moving forward in time one can get to the past. But this still does not explain why we observe ourselves at a particular point on the circle of time. So again if time can be measured in units then there must have been an original starting unit, and if it isn't then how is it that we observe ourselves at a particular point in time.

3. There was nothing, then for some reason there was something. All the evidence so far seems to suggest that this is the correct explanation. But it introduces a new question, how can nothing give rise to something?

Have I missed something or made some error in my analysis here? I welcome everyone's comments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2008, 06:28 PM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,312,066 times
Reputation: 378
And that is the ultimate mystery of the universe.

Still, I find it easier to be in awe of the infinite universe (or spontaneous, depending on your belief) than to believe in some deity to make it.




Side note: This should probably be in the science subforum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 06:38 PM
 
Location: Midessa, Texas Home Yangzhou, Jiangsu temporarily
1,506 posts, read 4,281,434 times
Reputation: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marodi View Post
And that is the ultimate mystery of the universe.

Still, I find it easier to be in awe of the infinite universe (or spontaneous, depending on your belief) than to believe in some deity to make it.
I agree and "a deity made it" doesn't really answer my question because a deity would still quality as stuff by my definition.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Marodi View Post
Side note: This should probably be in the science subforum.
Do you think so? I figured it would be ok here because I am not sure that science has an answer either (or rather the question maybe outside of the realm of science), so it would fall under philosophy. But if the mods want to move it, thats ok by me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
206 posts, read 578,365 times
Reputation: 83
This is a very interesting question, and one I give a lot of thought to. The really interesting thing though is you get into something of an infinite regress of causes.

Maybe someday we will understand how matter can be created or similar. Unfortunately, I doubt it will be within my lifetime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 10:00 PM
 
4,440 posts, read 9,072,460 times
Reputation: 1484
See I want to know what the universe is expanding into..

nothing? Basically.. whats outside the universe?

See picture for scientific map.
Attached Thumbnails
Something from nothing?  The origin of the universe-universe.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 10:15 PM
 
Location: South Central PA
1,565 posts, read 4,312,066 times
Reputation: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigthirsty View Post
See I want to know what the universe is expanding into..

nothing? Basically.. whats outside the universe?

See picture for scientific map.
We don't even fully understand what is beyond our solar system (interstellar winds and the like). I doubt any time soon (few hundred years) will we understand what, if anything, is beyond the universe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2008, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Netherlands
249 posts, read 532,161 times
Reputation: 72
Default A Field of Potential and Imaginary Dimensions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigthirsty View Post
See I want to know what the universe is expanding into..
nothing? Basically.. whats outside the universe?
Absolute nothing..

It doesn't even exist.

Raw.. non-existence.


But then.. on the other hand..

Maybe.. it's imaginary..

Like potential energy.. existing in a neutral condition.

The problem for physics is.. this means it would be undetectable..:-(

However.. the good news is..

---

“The implications are rather obvious, an imaginary space-time dimension has to be defined along with the four real space-time dimensions to fully represent all physics parameters. This shall upgrade all physics units into a set of space-time dimensions, one with real and the other with imaginary, resulting into at least one complex 4 dimension space time. This requires no major change in physics, but from thereoff, ALL quantities have to be assumed to be complex values, that is, have BOTH REAL & IMAGINARY COMPONENTS of space-time.”

The Particle: Black hole within matter

-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2008, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Ostend,Belgium....
8,827 posts, read 7,331,150 times
Reputation: 4949
I once asked that question, but got no answer, in religious instruction in school. Who made that creator then? Someone or something must have created him..If you say a god or higher power was at the beginning of all the "stuff"in the universe..then you still have to answer that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2008, 12:59 AM
 
4,440 posts, read 9,072,460 times
Reputation: 1484
Quote:
Originally Posted by accelerator View Post
Absolute nothing..

It doesn't even exist.

Raw.. non-existence.


But then.. on the other hand..

Maybe.. it's imaginary..

Like potential energy.. existing in a neutral condition.

The problem for physics is.. this means it would be undetectable..:-(

However.. the good news is..

---

“The implications are rather obvious, an imaginary space-time dimension has to be defined along with the four real space-time dimensions to fully represent all physics parameters. This shall upgrade all physics units into a set of space-time dimensions, one with real and the other with imaginary, resulting into at least one complex 4 dimension space time. This requires no major change in physics, but from thereoff, ALL quantities have to be assumed to be complex values, that is, have BOTH REAL & IMAGINARY COMPONENTS of space-time.”

The Particle: Black hole within matter

-
You lost me at "Implications".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2008, 01:08 AM
 
2,630 posts, read 4,941,178 times
Reputation: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidus View Post
Here is a question that I like to think about sometimes:

We observe a universe full of stuff. Stuff here is defined as matter, energy, anti-matter, dark matter, time, etc. etc. Basically everything.

What is the origin of stuff?

It seems there are a few possible answers.

1. There actually is no stuff and never has been. It is an illusion. This cannot be correct because if something, in this case me, can ask the question then at the very least the asker ,me, must exist. Also if it is an illusion then the illusion must exist and that would count as stuff. In addition a universe completely devoid of stuff would be just one possibility in an extremely large, maybe infinite, number of possibilities. It would be unlikely for a universe to be completely empty. Based on this, I think we can rule this option out.


2. There has always been stuff. This option doesn't seem very satisfying to me because there is no starting point. How can this be? If the past is infinite then how can we find ourselves in the present? Time must be measurable by some smallest amount, i.e. plank time. But if there are measurable units of time there must be some first unit at which the clock began in order for us to observe ourselves at some point on the continuum of time, i.e. the present. Maybe time is circular and by moving forward in time one can get to the past. But this still does not explain why we observe ourselves at a particular point on the circle of time. So again if time can be measured in units then there must have been an original starting unit, and if it isn't then how is it that we observe ourselves at a particular point in time.

3. There was nothing, then for some reason there was something. All the evidence so far seems to suggest that this is the correct explanation. But it introduces a new question, how can nothing give rise to something?

Have I missed something or made some error in my analysis here? I welcome everyone's comments.
The way i see the universe is in terms of being nothing. Erm how could i explain this? well think of the numbers 5,4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3,-4,-5 Their averages amount to 0. An example of this is in a vacuum, a vacuum is not empty, it has virtual particles(and theoretical black hole or mini universes) poping in and out of existence but we perceive it as nothing because it is nothing on average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Space
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top