Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Climate Battle: Port-aux-Francais vs. Murmansk
Port-aux-Francais 2 11.76%
Murmansk 15 88.24%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2012, 07:23 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,699,345 times
Reputation: 5248

Advertisements

Which climate would you choose?

Port-aux-Français - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Murmansk - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think I will go for Port-aux-Francais.. warmer winters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2012, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Leeds, UK
22,112 posts, read 29,578,708 times
Reputation: 8819
Murmansk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Laurentia
5,576 posts, read 7,997,640 times
Reputation: 2446
Murmansk. It has much better (colder/snowier) winters, bigger seasonality (including warmer summers), likely more snow overall, and like Kerguelen it's sunshine isn't too high.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Singapore
3,341 posts, read 5,557,660 times
Reputation: 2018
Murmansk is better overall. Besides the high number of rain days the summers look very comfortable. Winters are good temperature wise but drag on too long, although I do like them starting in October.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 09:06 PM
 
Location: New York City
2,745 posts, read 6,463,232 times
Reputation: 1890
Tough to say. P-a-F is definitely warmer but there are other factors at play here. For example, Kerguelens are a lot windier than Murmansk, something that's not captured by the wikipedia climate boxes. Also, Murmansk's trees look very stunted (if they are even trees at all) but nevertheless Murmansk looks a lot greener than P-a-F where grass is basically the extent of what can grow there. In P-a-F there is no season that I would look forward to whereas in Murmansk summers can still be enjoyable (though still far below what I would consider a decent summer). But, on the other hand, the polar winters in Murmansk must be incredibly depressing.

I can't decide. This is torture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 11:32 PM
 
Location: The Valley Of The Sun just east of Canberra
414 posts, read 797,923 times
Reputation: 362
Murmansk, snowier in winter and warmer in summer. Cfc climates, bar the few that retain a snowpack, are frustrating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2012, 11:56 PM
 
914 posts, read 2,103,837 times
Reputation: 650
Murmansk is about as cold as Minneapolis, and not cold at all for my taste.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2012, 12:12 AM
 
Location: New York City
2,745 posts, read 6,463,232 times
Reputation: 1890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaul View Post
Murmansk is about as cold as Minneapolis, and not cold at all for my taste.
Murmansk is colder, especially if you average the winter months together. But the real difference is in the length of the season. In Minneapolis, you get 3, maybe 4 months of freezing weather and the rest of the year you have to deal with those godawful temps above 32F. In Murmansk, freezing weather lasts nearly twice as long.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2012, 12:20 AM
 
Location: Melbourne AUS
1,155 posts, read 1,952,941 times
Reputation: 843
I'd rather mod cut than live in either of these hellholes.

meh, probably Murmansk, guaranteed more sunshine (as pathetic as it is) than a maritime subarctic hole smack bang in the middle of the roaring-40's. And atleast in Murmansk, you could recieve some warmth.

Last edited by nei; 04-30-2012 at 10:13 AM.. Reason: language
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2012, 03:36 AM
 
Location: Paris
8,159 posts, read 8,730,067 times
Reputation: 3552
Murmansk, no brainer. Port-aux-Français never gets warm nor really cold, just depressing and uncomfortable year-long. Besides that Murmansk looks like a much more happening place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top