Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which oceanic climate do you like better?
London 37 34.26%
Seattle 71 65.74%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015, 05:51 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,614,499 times
Reputation: 3099

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
They would have to drive over 1000 miles to Southern Spain.
You could fly there in an hour and a half, probably for less than the drive costs in fuel.

 
Old 01-21-2015, 07:16 AM
 
91 posts, read 115,819 times
Reputation: 42
Seattle, because it has more variation.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 07:37 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,951,184 times
Reputation: 5895
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
You could fly there in an hour and a half, probably for less than the drive costs in fuel.

Well if you want to play that game, a person in Seattle could be in a tropical climate in January with a 5 hour flight to Honolulu. Impossible for someone in London.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 07:41 AM
B87
 
Location: Surrey/London
11,769 posts, read 10,614,499 times
Reputation: 3099
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
Well if you want to play that game, a person in Seattle could be in a tropical climate in January with a 5 hour flight to Honolulu. Impossible for someone in London.
You could be in a tropical climate in West Africa in 6 hours. It's also a 4 hr flight to Las Palmas or a 6 hr flight to Dubai.

This thread isn't about which climates are hours away, it's about 2 cities.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,951,184 times
Reputation: 5895
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
You could be in a tropical climate in West Africa in 6 hours. It's also a 4 hr flight to Las Palmas or a 6 hr flight to Dubai.

This thread isn't about which climates are hours away, it's about 2 cities.

It is about two cities, and Seattle is slightly warmer and sunnier on an annual basis. But to me they are basically the same climate with a different precip pattern.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 08:00 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,568,079 times
Reputation: 15184
Temperature-wise the difference isn't big. Main difference is Seattle has more sunshine in the summer (and slightly more spring and autumn), while much more stretches of rain in the wintertime. While Seattle has more long stretches of sun in the summer, it has more long stretches of rain in the winter. Sunday's is forecast to be partly sunny and 58°F in Seattle not bad.

As for London getting a reputation for drizzle, I think in the US Seattle has a worse reputation for drizzle. In any case, Seattle seems to be the clear choice, as I care more about sunshine than drizzle.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 08:01 AM
 
29,556 posts, read 19,666,897 times
Reputation: 4563
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
You could fly there in an hour and a half, probably for less than the drive costs in fuel.
And in an hour and a half I wound be in Miami where it's 27C today...

The point is there is no climate nearby London that has an average high of 33C+ as there is near Seattle Washington (150 miles drive).
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:05 AM
 
Location: Seattle area
9,182 posts, read 12,145,507 times
Reputation: 6405
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
You could fly there in an hour and a half, probably for less than the drive costs in fuel.
and from Seattle you can't?
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:53 AM
 
367 posts, read 409,787 times
Reputation: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by B87 View Post
London can easily get over 15 days without rain, multiple times, every year.

A typical summer day in London is partly cloudy, so it's not normal to have 15 consecutive days with are 100% cloudless, day and night. It's common to have 15 mostly sunny days in a row though.
Astonishing isn't it?

This being a mainly US forum, best not get your hopes up getting them to think beyond their preconceptions of the rest of the world.
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:56 AM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,568,079 times
Reputation: 15184
I've spent more time in London than Seattle. I don't remember the summers being that rainy, but 15 days without rain sounds a bit unlikely. And maybe even 15 mostly sunny days.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top