Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you had cities in Australia where the population was 50% to 80% black, then you would understand why black and white integration is such a big issue.
No two races in the world are as different as whites of European descent and blacks of African descent.
If you had cities in Australia where the population was 50% to 80% black, then you would understand why black and white integration is such a big issue.
There are certainly towns and small cities in the NT and northern WA that have a large indigenous population, particularly when you include smaller settlements within 20 or 30 minutes drive time.
I don’t know the answer to that. But I have noticed that almost every developed country has very restricted immigration from sub-Saharan African countries.
It does strike me as curious and I’ll leave it at that.
I've heard people say the U.K is almost as diverse as the U.S. I was surprised at how diverse London was. I'm wondered which is better integrated overall. Obviously this isn't about demographic numbers, I know on paper the U.S is still more diverse. However what area do people of different races and background get along with each other the best. Which is less segregated and has less racial tension? I realize that this can vary greatly based on specific regions of the two countries. But overall which is better?
Funny how you asked specifically NOT to make this about numbers, and almost right away posters made this about numbers.
Overall? Entire countries with tens and hundreds of millions of humans? Who knows?
Who, what statistician, can measure how "people get along with each other ... tension"?
I would take it on a scale of local community (e.g. workplace, school, classroom, residential building, court house) and individual-to-individual basis.
Collecting statistics is a business, like any other, and statisticians look to protect their business interests, like everybody else, so they tend to divide people on large scale (easier to manage) like so many sycophant politicians and their business overlords.
I don’t know the answer to that. But I have noticed that almost every developed country has very restricted immigration from sub-Saharan African countries.
It does strike me as curious and I’ll leave it at that.
Really? There's been a lot of people moving from Sub Saharan Africa to America lately and most of them are actually educated and well off. It's part of the brain drain problem with many African countries.
Really? There's been a lot of people moving from Sub Saharan Africa to America lately and most of them are actually educated and well off. It's part of the brain drain problem with many African countries.
I know some in local school communities, from Congo and a few other places, very classy people.
I don’t know the answer to that. But I have noticed that almost every developed country has very restricted immigration from sub-Saharan African countries.
It does strike me as curious and I’ll leave it at that.
Probably because most sub saharan Africans don't emigrate out of Africa in the same numbers as people who leave Asian and Latin American countries. And I'll leave it at that.
Probably because most sub saharan Africans don't emigrate out of Africa in the same numbers as people who leave Asian and Latin American countries. And I'll leave it at that.
They're also younger countries with a higher birth rate than western countries. Although 2nd and 3rd generations typically have birth rates similar to the local population.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.