Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Canterbury Elementary School in Edinburg, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 95
Address
 2821 W CANTON RD
Edinburg, TX 78539
Telephone
(956) 289-2374
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
95
Students
622
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
36.1
Free lunch eligible students
310
School district
EDINBURG CISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Canterbury Elementary School:

95
DE LA VINA ELEM (1.0 miles):

91
FREDDY GONZALEZ EL (0.8 miles):

90
TREVINO EL (1.3 miles):

90
L B JOHNSON EL (1.4 miles):

85
CAVAZOS EL (1.5 miles):

81
B L GARZA MIDDLE SCHOOL (1.1 miles):

61
VISTA ACADEMY OF EDINBURG (0.3 miles):

37
PREMIER HIGH SCHOOLS CAREER & TECHNICAL ED CENTER (1.6 miles):

16
Canterbury Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Hidalgo County:

58
Edinburg:

70
Canterbury Elementary School:

95

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 622
Enrollment in 2015: 613
Enrollment in 2014: 613
Enrollment in 2013: 626
Enrollment in 2012: 607
Enrollment in 2011: 621
Enrollment in 2010: 724
Enrollment in 2009: 693
Enrollment in 2008: 677
Enrollment in 2007: 598
Enrollment in 2006: 537
Enrollment in 2005: 492
Enrollment in 2004: 396
Enrollment in 2003: 438
Enrollment in 2002: 472
Enrollment in 2001: 424
Enrollment in 2000: 563
Enrollment in 1999: 581

Canterbury Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students476510110510797100622
Female students25285058615247321
Male students22375147464553301
Asian students61711610647
Hispanic students38558487938188526
Black students - - - - 1214
White students258653231
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - - 11
Two or More Races students142121213

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 47
Kindergarten enrollment: 65
1st grade enrollment: 101
2nd grade enrollment: 105
3rd grade enrollment: 107
4th grade enrollment: 97
5th grade enrollment: 100

Canterbury Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 321 (51.6%)
Here:

51.6%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 301 (48.4%)
Here:

48.4%
Texas:

50.1%

Canterbury Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 47 (7.6%)
Canterbury Elementary School:

7.6%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 526 (84.6%)
Canterbury Elementary School:

84.6%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
Canterbury Elementary School:

0.6%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 31 (5.0%)
Canterbury Elementary School:

5.0%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
School:

0.2%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 13 (2.1%)
School:

2.1%
State:

2.1%

Canterbury Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 310 (49.8%)
School:

49.8%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 310 (49.8%)
Canterbury Elementary School:

49.8%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
Here:

0.0%
State:

6.2%

Canterbury Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 36.1

Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 11
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

17.2
State:

15.6

Canterbury Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,282,745
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 42 (Salary Expenditures: $1,853,454)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $107,018)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 8.5 (Salary Expenditures: $232,245)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $90,028)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $77,748
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,777,410
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,045,988
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7 (Salary Expenditures: $146,985)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12.7 (Salary Expenditures: $494,409)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $90,028)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $104,214

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic67
  • Asian25
  • White2
  • IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 94 (male: 40, female: 54)
  • Hispanic: 67 (male: 29, female: 38)
  • Asian: 25 (male: 11, female: 14)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,429 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Canterbury Elementary School:

3.1%
Texas:

5.2%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic121
  • Asian22
  • Black2
  • White4
  • Multirace4
  • LEP10
  • IDEA4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 153 (male: 73, female: 80)
  • Hispanic: 121 (male: 56, female: 65)
  • Asian: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Canterbury Elementary School:

246.0
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,595
  • Males1,598
  • Females1,592
  • Hispanic1,591
  • Asian1,638
Math Average Scale Score:

1,595
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 123
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 123

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.8 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.5 (87%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

5%
22%
23%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,598, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 55%)
5%
22%
18%
55%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 46%)
5%
21%
28%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 108, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 48%)
6%
22%
24%
48%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 67%)
11%
22%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,534
  • Males1,515
  • Females1,553
  • Hispanic1,526
  • Asian1,592
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,534
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 123
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 123

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

8%
18%
25%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 50%)
13%
19%
18%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 48%)
3%
17%
32%
48%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 108, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 48%)
9%
20%
23%
48%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 56%)
44%
56%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,644
  • Males1,665
  • Females1,626
  • Hispanic1,626
  • Asian1,780
  • White1,672
Math Average Scale Score:

1,644
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 117
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.4 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

7%
26%
22%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 42%)
4%
23%
31%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 48%)
10%
29%
13%
48%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,626, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 40%)
7%
31%
22%
40%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,780, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 82%)
18%
82%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,672, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 57%)
14%
15%
14%
57%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,603
  • Males1,600
  • Females1,605
  • Hispanic1,592
  • Asian1,673
  • White1,608
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,603
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 117
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

10%
22%
22%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 44%)
9%
20%
27%
44%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 48%)
11%
24%
17%
48%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 44%)
11%
24%
21%
44%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 64%)
9%
27%
64%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,608, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
43%
14%
43%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,132
  • Males4,104
  • Females4,157
  • Hispanic4,054
  • Asian4,691
  • White4,105
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,132
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 116
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 116

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.9 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.8 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

18%
29%
26%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,104, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 22%)
13%
33%
32%
22%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,157, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 31%)
23%
24%
22%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,054, Tested: 97, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 25%)
20%
32%
23%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,691, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 55%)
18%
27%
55%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,105, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 71%, Masters: 0%)
29%
71%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Writing students tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,707
  • Males1,729
  • Females1,689
  • Hispanic1,693
  • Asian1,826
  • White1,702
Math Average Scale Score:

1,707
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 99
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 99

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.6 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.1 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 9%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 40%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 45%

6%
9%
40%
45%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,729, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 45%, Masters: 50%)
5%
45%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,689, Tested: 55, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 42%)
11%
13%
34%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 83, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 40%)
6%
11%
43%
40%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,826, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 67%)
17%
16%
67%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,661
  • Males1,693
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,652
  • Asian1,815
  • White1,660
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,661
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 100
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 100

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 50%

10%
12%
28%
50%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 55%)
5%
6%
34%
55%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 46%)
14%
16%
24%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 84, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 48%)
11%
12%
29%
48%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,815, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,660, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 50%)
33%
17%
50%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,223
  • Males4,336
  • Females4,132
  • Hispanic4,190
  • Asian4,620
  • White4,225
Science Average Scale Score:

4,223
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 98
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 98

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

8%
26%
25%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,336, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 39%)
25%
36%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,132, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 43%)
15%
26%
16%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,190, Tested: 82, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 38%)
9%
28%
25%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,620, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,225, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
17%
16%
34%
33%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
School:

3.2
State:

30.4

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic31
  • White2
  • IDEA5
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 33 (male: 19, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 31 (male: 17, female: 14)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 5 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

53.1
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 3
  • White: 1
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 1
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 3

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

4.8
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Canterbury Elementary School:

1.6
Texas:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Comments

1
Maria Hinojosa
Report this comment as inappropriate
Aug 20, 2012 @ 6:18 pm
My daughter is enrolled & we r planning to buy a house so we need to know what zone to look at.

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Edinburg, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Edinburg main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Canterbury Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents