Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


City View Elementary School in Wichita Falls, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47
Address
 1023 CITY VIEW DR
Wichita Falls, TX 76306
Telephone
(940) 855-2351
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.cityview-isd.net/
City-data.com school rating
47
Students
589
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
37.8
Free lunch eligible students
357
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
57
School district
CITY VIEW ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
JOHN G TOWER EL (3.3 miles):

72
SCOTLAND PARK EL (2.7 miles):

67
City View Elementary School:

47
HIRSCHI H S (1.4 miles):

36
CROCKETT EL (2.9 miles):

31
CITY VIEW JUNIOR/SENIOR HIGH (0.6 miles):

29
HAYNES EL (2.6 miles):

28
BURGESS EL (1.4 miles):

22
KIRBY MIDDLE (1.3 miles):

15
City View Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Wichita County:

49
Wichita Falls:

47
City View Elementary School:

47

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 589
Enrollment in 2015: 611
Enrollment in 2014: 591
Enrollment in 2013: 584
Enrollment in 2012: 553
Enrollment in 2011: 545
Enrollment in 2010: 559
Enrollment in 2009: 598
Enrollment in 2008: 550
Enrollment in 2007: 586
Enrollment in 2006: 626
Enrollment in 2005: 635
Enrollment in 2004: 665
Enrollment in 2003: 671
Enrollment in 2002: 622
Enrollment in 2001: 638
Enrollment in 2000: 468
Enrollment in 1999: 735

City View Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students4276787973727891589
Female students1643403237383645287
Male students2633384736344246302
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - 1315
Asian students - - 12112 - 7
Hispanic students1114222727202532178
Black students92107454748
White students1953413939404050321
Two or More Races students3744254130

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 42
Kindergarten enrollment: 76
1st grade enrollment: 78
2nd grade enrollment: 79
3rd grade enrollment: 73
4th grade enrollment: 72
5th grade enrollment: 78
6th grade enrollment: 91

City View Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 287 (48.7%)
Here:

48.7%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 302 (51.3%)
School:

51.3%
Texas:

50.1%

City View Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 5 (0.8%)
School:

0.8%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 7 (1.2%)
School:

1.2%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 178 (30.2%)
Here:

30.2%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 48 (8.1%)
School:

8.1%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 321 (54.5%)
Here:

54.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 30 (5.1%)
City View Elementary School:

5.1%
Texas:

2.1%

City View Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 414 (70.3%)
School:

70.3%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 357 (60.6%)
City View Elementary School:

60.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 57 (9.7%)
City View Elementary School:

9.7%
Texas:

6.2%

City View Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 37.8

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 10
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

15.6
State:

15.6

City View Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $4,002,147
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 37.8 (Salary Expenditures: $3,136,928)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $195,386)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.5 (Salary Expenditures: $390,833)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $279,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $844,603
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $4,789,790
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,136,928
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 23 (Salary Expenditures: $394,912)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12.5 (Salary Expenditures: $452,791)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $279,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $947,624

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 62 (male: 48, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 23 (male: 19, female: 4)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 35 (male: 25, female: 10)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained

    Total number of students retained in Kindergarten

  • Hispanic2
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Here:

10.5%
Texas:

5.2%

    Total number of students retained in 1st grade

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA2
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
City View Elementary School:

10.3%
State:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 8 (male: 2, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

10.1%
State:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
City View Elementary School:

5.5%
State:

4.1%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic7
  • Black2
  • White13
  • Multirace2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 24 (male: 13, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

40.7
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,447
  • Males1,459
  • Females1,431
  • Hispanic1,429
  • Black1,413
  • White1,461
  • Multirace1,468
Math Average Scale Score:

1,447
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 84
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.1 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 50%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

17%
50%
21%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,459, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 15%)
17%
43%
25%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 58%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 8%)
17%
58%
17%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,429, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 9%)
26%
52%
13%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,413, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 0%)
15%
62%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,461, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 15%)
15%
40%
30%
15%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,468, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 83%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
83%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,413
  • Males1,417
  • Females1,408
  • Hispanic1,409
  • Black1,368
  • White1,432
  • Multirace1,378
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,413
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 84
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 84

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

30%
34%
24%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,417, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 13%)
25%
42%
20%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 11%)
36%
25%
28%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,409, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 9%)
26%
44%
21%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,368, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 0%)
38%
47%
15%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,432, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 20%)
30%
27%
23%
20%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,378, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 0%)
33%
34%
33%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,600
  • Females1,580
  • Hispanic1,556
  • Black1,563
  • White1,622
  • Multirace1,586
Math Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 86
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

12%
29%
30%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,600, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 31%)
11%
22%
36%
31%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,580, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 25%)
13%
41%
22%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 22%)
19%
28%
31%
22%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,563, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
14%
43%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 35%)
5%
25%
35%
35%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
13%
50%
13%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,481
  • Males1,484
  • Females1,476
  • Hispanic1,447
  • Black1,520
  • White1,516
  • Multirace1,408
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,481
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 86
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.2 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

37%
32%
15%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 17%)
33%
39%
11%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,476, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 16%)
44%
18%
22%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,447, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 9%)
53%
28%
10%
9%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 14%)
14%
29%
43%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 22%)
22%
37%
19%
22%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 75%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
75%
12%
13%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,490
  • Males3,524
  • Females3,434
  • Hispanic3,338
  • Black3,546
  • White3,609
  • Multirace3,445
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,490
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 86
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 86

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

52%
28%
15%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,524, Tested: 54, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 4%)
50%
28%
18%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,434, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 6%)
56%
28%
10%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,338, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 3%)
63%
25%
10%
3%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,546, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
29%
42%
29%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,609, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 8%)
49%
27%
16%
8%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,445, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
63%
13%
25%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,606
  • Males1,593
  • Females1,616
  • Hispanic1,582
  • Black1,555
  • White1,640
  • Multirace1,576
Math Average Scale Score:

1,606
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 79
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

15%
39%
27%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 21%)
18%
44%
17%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 18%)
13%
36%
33%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 19%)
19%
39%
23%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
44%
34%
11%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,640, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 22%)
5%
41%
32%
22%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
17%
50%
16%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,576
  • Males1,554
  • Females1,593
  • Hispanic1,539
  • Black1,490
  • White1,628
  • Multirace1,547
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,576
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 79
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.1 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

22%
27%
31%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,554, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 15%)
24%
23%
38%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 24%)
20%
31%
25%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,539, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 12%)
27%
31%
30%
12%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 0%)
44%
45%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
14%
18%
36%
32%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
17%
33%
33%
17%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,775
  • Males3,744
  • Females3,798
  • Hispanic3,684
  • Black3,532
  • White3,898
  • Multirace3,796
Science Average Scale Score:

3,775
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 79
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 79

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 49%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

22%
49%
20%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,744, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 9%)
31%
43%
17%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,798, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 9%)
14%
54%
23%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,684, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 7%)
30%
40%
23%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,532, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 0%)
44%
45%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,898, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 11%)
11%
53%
25%
11%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,796, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 66%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 17%)
17%
66%
17%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,680
  • Males1,655
  • Females1,707
  • Hispanic1,686
  • Black1,603
  • White1,683
Math Average Scale Score:

1,680
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 61
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

15%
29%
33%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 19%)
19%
31%
31%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,707, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 28%)
10%
28%
34%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,686, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
13%
27%
40%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,683, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 27%)
15%
33%
25%
27%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,585
  • Males1,545
  • Females1,629
  • Hispanic1,578
  • Black1,521
  • White1,587
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,585
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 61
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 61

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.2 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

34%
25%
21%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 13%)
50%
22%
15%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 28%)
17%
28%
27%
28%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 20%)
33%
34%
13%
20%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,587, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
39%
19%
21%
21%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 26
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 27 (male: 18, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
Instances of corporal punishment (Students with disabilities): 4
Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2

Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic10
  • Black2
  • White19
  • Multirace2
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 33 (male: 13, female: 20)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

56.0
Texas:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 3, female: 3)
  • Black: 3 (all female)
  • White: 3 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 1 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
School:

1.7
Texas:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 28 (male: 19, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
School:

1.7
State:

27.5
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 7 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 5
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Transfers:
(State average from 1,202 schools)
Transfer to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons is a subset of expulsion with educational services. An alternative school is a public elementary or secondary school that addresses the needs of students that typically cannot be met in a regular school program. The school provides nontraditional education; serves as an adjunct to a regular school; and falls outside of the categories of regular education, special education, or vocational education.
Students without disabilities transferred to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)

Students without disabilities transferred to an alternative school for disciplinary reasons per 1,000 students
School:

10.2
State:

49.7

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Wichita Falls, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Wichita Falls main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. City View Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents