Show street view
No street view available for this location
1
Angela
Apr 10, 2011 @ 2:14 pm
In The School That They Are Building Is There Going To Be Blue Tables Like The Old School Outside
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 13
School number: 7036
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 247-4895
Principal: Keitha D Burnett
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 119
Senate District: 39
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 62% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 89% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 86% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 58% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 449 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 47% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 52% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 452 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 400 |
| State average from 452 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 450 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: D
Grade in 2009: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 50% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 454 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 60% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 20% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 60% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 440 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 33% |
| State average from 443 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 59% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 72% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 442 schools: | 56% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 441 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 478 |
| State average from 441 schools: | 522 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 448 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 446 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
Region: 5| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 451 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 35% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 32% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 45% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1819 |
| State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 40% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 16% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 2% |
| State average: | 12% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 11 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1938 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 302 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 56% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 42% |
| State average: | 35% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 37% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 15 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 239 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 30% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1906 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 297 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 21% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 60% |
| State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1970 |
| State average: | 1995 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 320 |
| State average: | 326 |
Percent Passing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average: | 80% |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 24% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 3% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 52% |
| State average: | 69% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1886 |
| State average: | 1907 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1913 |
| State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 299 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1933 |
| State average: | 1894 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 314 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1893 |
| State average: | 1915 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 273 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 703 |
| State average from 2275 schools: | 694 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 71 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 11 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| LAWRENCE ACADEMY SENIOR HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.