City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
48.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 4 School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:| Florida: | 45 |
| Okeechobee County: | 39 |
| Okeechobee: | 39 |
| This School: | 48 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (863) 763-6019 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 9104
School type: Senior High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5295
Principal: Antonio Peters
The function/setting of the school: Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 17
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 75% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 63% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 60% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 63% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 560 |
| State average from 13 schools: | 542 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 35% |
Region: 1
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 54% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 78% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 73% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 83% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 621 |
| State average from 13 schools: | 567 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 41% |
Minority Rate| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 13 schools: | 36% |
Region: 1
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 80% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 89% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Science| Here: | 36% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains | Here: | 79% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 84% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 75% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading | Here: | 93% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)| Here: | 622 |
| State average from 12 schools: | 559 |
Percent Tested| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: F
Grade in 2003: C
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 37% |
Minority Rate| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 100% |
| State average from 12 schools: | 37% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1487 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 17% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1618 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1593 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 52% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1861 |
| State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 338 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 3% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 51% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 86% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1924 |
| State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2057 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 9% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 298 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 57% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 36% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 310 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 18% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 39% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1509 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 52% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 90% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1650 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 14% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 73% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1719 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 14% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1802 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 37% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 71% |
| State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1883 |
| State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2| Here: | 24% |
| State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 74% |
| State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1950 |
| State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4| Here: | 21% |
| State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above| Here: | 88% |
| State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1498 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 333 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1595 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1559 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 294 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 1796 |
| State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1984 |
| State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 351 |
| State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1977 |
| State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 293 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 311 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1593 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1662 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1582 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 315 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1835 |
| State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 347 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1945 |
| State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1943 |
| State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 61%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 33%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1332 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 305 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1535 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 312 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1549 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 2002 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1884 |
| State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 331 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 1979 |
| State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 329 |
| State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 294 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 1416 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 1550 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 321 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1555 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1868 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 355 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 1903 |
| State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score| Here: | 1968 |
| State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 612 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 42 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 10 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 12 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 17 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 648 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 66 |
| State average: | 69 |
Functional (max 18)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 692 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 684 |
| State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students| OKEECHOBEE JUVENILE JUSTICE-LEVEL 4: | 15 |
| State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale Score| Here: | 687 |
| State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 300 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined| Here: | 325 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Okeechobee, FL
- Okeechobee Juvenile Justice-Level 4 School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: