Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Richardson Terrace Elementary School in Richardson, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 64
Address
 300 N DOROTHY AVE
Richardson, TX 75081
Telephone
(469) 593-8700
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.richardson.k12.tx.us/administration/sch
City-data.com school rating
64
Students
518
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
35.0
Free lunch eligible students
286
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
50
School district
RICHARDSON ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
MATH/SCIENCE/TECH MAGNET (0.6 miles):

93
JESS HARBEN EL (1.3 miles):

73
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

64
MARK TWAIN EL (1.1 miles):

62
RICHARDSON HEIGHTS EL (1.3 miles):

59
NORTHRICH EL (1.3 miles):

55
RICHLAND EL (1.4 miles):

53
EVOLUTION ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (1.6 miles):

50
WINFREE ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL (RICHARDSON) (1.3 miles):

48
Richardson Terrace Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Richardson:

71
Richardson Terrace Elementary:

64

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 518
Enrollment in 2015: 510
Enrollment in 2014: 521
Enrollment in 2013: 560
Enrollment in 2012: 547
Enrollment in 2011: 531
Enrollment in 2010: 506
Enrollment in 2009: 482
Enrollment in 2008: 484
Enrollment in 2007: 504
Enrollment in 2006: 541
Enrollment in 2005: 590
Enrollment in 2004: 592
Enrollment in 2003: 631
Enrollment in 2002: 624
Enrollment in 2001: 614
Enrollment in 2000: 530
Enrollment in 1999: 561

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students6165626674666856518
Female students2732304032323029252
Male students3433322642343827266
Asian students131211914713786
Hispanic students1617201717182219146
Black students2017112520261713149
White students1018181418131213116
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students1 - - - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students1121524420

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 61
Kindergarten enrollment: 65
1st grade enrollment: 62
2nd grade enrollment: 66
3rd grade enrollment: 74
4th grade enrollment: 66
5th grade enrollment: 68
6th grade enrollment: 56

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 252 (48.6%)
Here:

48.6%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 266 (51.4%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

51.4%
State:

50.1%

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Asian enrollment: 86 (16.6%)
School:

16.6%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 146 (28.2%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

28.2%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 149 (28.8%)
School:

28.8%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 116 (22.4%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

22.4%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Here:

0.2%
State:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 20 (3.9%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

3.9%
Texas:

2.1%

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 336 (64.9%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

64.9%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 286 (55.2%)
School:

55.2%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 50 (9.7%)
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

9.7%
State:

6.2%

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 35

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 34
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.8
Texas:

15.6

Richardson Terrace Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,997,648
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 28 (Salary Expenditures: $1,559,168)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $30,737)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.8 (Salary Expenditures: $249,934)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $157,810)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $235,221
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,791,239
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,027,500
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $115,742)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 12.2 (Salary Expenditures: $489,984)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $158,013)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $265,876

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic58
  • Asian52
  • Black31
  • White25
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA19
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 168 (male: 88, female: 80)
  • Hispanic: 58 (male: 29, female: 29)
  • Asian: 52 (male: 29, female: 23)
  • Black: 31 (male: 14, female: 17)
  • White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic17
  • Asian4
  • Black11
  • White11
  • LEP20
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 43 (male: 31, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • Black: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 20 (male: 13, female: 7)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic2
  • Black4
  • White7
  • Multirace2
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 15 (male: 7, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,844 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

3.1%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

3.0%
Texas:

3.6%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White10
  • LEP2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 20 (male: 11, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Richardson Terrace Elementary School:

38.6
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,501
  • Males1,483
  • Females1,528
  • Hispanic1,501
  • Asian1,521
  • Black1,496
  • White1,505
Math Average Scale Score:

1,501
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 62
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 62

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (73%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

16%
28%
27%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 26%)
18%
24%
32%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,528, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 33%)
13%
34%
21%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,501, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 31%)
23%
31%
15%
31%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 42%)
17%
16%
25%
42%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 27%)
13%
34%
26%
27%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,505, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 25%)
10%
25%
40%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,474
  • Males1,477
  • Females1,471
  • Hispanic1,513
  • Asian1,414
  • Black1,484
  • White1,481
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,474
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 62
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 62

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.6 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

15%
38%
15%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 39%)
18%
32%
11%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,471, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 21%)
8%
50%
21%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 46%)
15%
39%
46%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,414, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 25%)
33%
42%
25%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,484, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 33%)
13%
40%
14%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
5%
35%
30%
30%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,608
  • Males1,594
  • Females1,625
  • Hispanic1,564
  • Asian1,582
  • Black1,591
  • White1,678
Math Average Scale Score:

1,608
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 58
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 34%

14%
27%
25%
34%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 35%)
19%
29%
17%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,625, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
7%
26%
34%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 21%)
14%
43%
22%
21%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 44%)
22%
22%
12%
44%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 28%)
17%
33%
22%
28%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,678, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 47%)
6%
12%
35%
47%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,526
  • Males1,499
  • Females1,557
  • Hispanic1,543
  • Asian1,488
  • Black1,496
  • White1,565
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,526
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 58
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 22%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

29%
23%
22%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,499, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 19%)
42%
16%
23%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,557, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
15%
29%
23%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 36%)
29%
7%
28%
36%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,488, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 33%)
44%
23%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
28%
50%
11%
11%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,565, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 29%)
24%
5%
42%
29%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,663
  • Males3,509
  • Females3,846
  • Hispanic3,610
  • Asian3,446
  • Black3,616
  • White3,868
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,663
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 57
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 58

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.9 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.8 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

37%
33%
18%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,509, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 10%)
45%
36%
9%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,846, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 15%)
27%
31%
27%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,610, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
43%
28%
22%
7%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 3,446, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
67%
11%
11%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,616, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 6%)
35%
41%
18%
6%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,868, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 24%)
18%
41%
17%
24%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,702
  • Males1,711
  • Females1,691
  • Hispanic1,665
  • Asian1,737
  • Black1,667
  • White1,752
Math Average Scale Score:

1,702
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 70
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.2 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 54%

9%
10%
27%
54%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,711, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 62%)
5%
10%
23%
62%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,691, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 45%)
13%
10%
32%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 38%)
13%
7%
43%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,737, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 77%)
8%
15%
77%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 47%)
16%
21%
16%
47%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,752, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 61%)
6%
33%
61%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,647
  • Males1,655
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,613
  • Asian1,646
  • Black1,665
  • White1,674
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,647
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 69
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.9 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (75%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 42%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

7%
23%
42%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 51%, Masters: 26%)
5%
18%
51%
26%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 30%)
10%
30%
30%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,613, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
6%
38%
31%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,646, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 31%)
15%
8%
46%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 26%)
37%
37%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,674, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 53%, Masters: 35%)
12%
53%
35%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,056
  • Males4,124
  • Females3,971
  • Hispanic4,044
  • Asian4,228
  • Black3,889
  • White4,168
Science Average Scale Score:

4,056
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 70
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 70

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.3 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.4 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

10%
39%
21%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,124, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 36%)
10%
36%
18%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,971, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 23%)
10%
42%
25%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,044, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 25%)
6%
38%
31%
25%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,228, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 46%)
8%
23%
23%
46%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,889, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 21%)
21%
42%
16%
21%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,168, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 39%)
6%
38%
17%
39%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,709
  • Males1,680
  • Females1,731
  • Hispanic1,650
  • Asian1,850
  • Black1,703
  • White1,705
Math Average Scale Score:

1,709
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 80
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.4 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 30%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

15%
22%
30%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,680, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 21%)
18%
17%
44%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,731, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 41%)
13%
26%
20%
41%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,650, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 20%)
20%
30%
30%
20%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,850, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 58%)
8%
34%
58%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,703, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 31%)
23%
19%
27%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,705, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 32%)
5%
27%
36%
32%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,617
  • Males1,570
  • Females1,652
  • Hispanic1,607
  • Asian1,634
  • Black1,627
  • White1,612
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,617
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 80
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

21%
34%
24%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 9%)
26%
48%
17%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 30%)
17%
24%
29%
30%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 15%)
25%
50%
10%
15%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 33%)
17%
33%
17%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 31%)
19%
27%
23%
31%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 11%)
21%
26%
42%
11%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic13
  • Asian7
  • Black10
  • White16
  • Multirace2
  • LEP19
  • IDEA7
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 48 (male: 25, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • White: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

92.7
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Black1
  • White3
  • IDEA4
  • 5041
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 3, female: 1)
  • Black: 1 (all female)
  • White: 3 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 3, female: 1)
  • Section 504: 1 (all female)

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black5
  • White2
  • Multirace2
  • LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
School:

1.9
Texas:

27.5

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black4
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5044
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 6, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Richardson, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Richardson main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Richardson Terrace Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents