Somerset Academy Charter High School in Homestead, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 82.

23255 SW 115TH AVE
Homestead, FL 33032

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (18.8 miles):

94
Somerset Academy Charter High School:

82
Neva King Cooper Educational Center School (8.0 miles):

76
Doral Academy Charter High School (17.4 miles):

62
Academy Of Arts & Minds School (15.1 miles):

47
Mater Academy East Charter High School (18.8 miles):

32
South Miami Senior High School (12.9 miles):

20
Corporate Academy South School (8.5 miles):

6
Somerset Academy Charter High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Homestead:

40
Somerset Academy Charter High:

82
1
McLeod
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jul 15, 2015 @ 11:11 am
Granddaughter relocating to the neighborhood this fall, any openings at somerset academy for new students this fall?

Thanks

Bill McLeod

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 257-3737 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7042
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 257-3751
Principal: Kenneth J Feria
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 18
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 120
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://somersetsilverpalms.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

538
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

77%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

508
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

95%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

594
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1947
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

2066
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

78%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

48%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

46%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1958
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

312
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

2062
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

342
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

95%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1970
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1984
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1941
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1942
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1960
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

31
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

2082
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2073
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1989
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2074
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 13
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2085
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

2075
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 10

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2022
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2017
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1930
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2057
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2057
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2010
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 47

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
SOMERSET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL:

735
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 90
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 14): 12
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

722
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

730
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 10
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

723
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

341
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Homestead, FL
  5. Somerset Academy Charter High School in Homestead, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.