Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Hong Kong be back under British Rule?
Yes: God Save the Queen 11 26.19%
No: I love comunism 2 4.76%
No: We Should be indipendent 18 42.86%
No: I have other ideas 6 14.29%
I realy don't care! And anyway China will always rule Hong Kong as it is a stubborn country! 5 11.90%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-02-2014, 08:00 PM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,539 posts, read 24,029,400 times
Reputation: 23962

Advertisements

Hong Kong is much better under British rule. I visited there many times prior to '97 and after '97. Native Hong Konger's loved the "old days". Mainland China is slowly decimating Hong Kong "one cut at a time" and the natives hate it.

Control of the media, censorship, control of the outcome of elections are the tactics being used by the mainland Chinese government to take full control of Hong Kong.

The ramifications are that Hong Kong will lose it's economic and political freedom, which will eventually equal a deterioration in free market economics, meaning lower prosperity for all, including the mainland Chinese.

The mainland Chinese government are despotic people, and the world will eventually realize what the long-term implications are of this control of Hong Kong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-02-2014, 08:07 PM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,539 posts, read 24,029,400 times
Reputation: 23962
Chief "As*xcutive" CY Leung should step down. The will and wishes of the pro-democracy supporters is clear. Politicians should "serve the people" and it's clear (at least to me) that his unpopularity is based on the fact this his constituency is unhappy with him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 08:39 PM
 
9 posts, read 10,793 times
Reputation: 17
Having White British officials at the top of government departments with local Chinese at the bottom is surely not what the HK Chinese want. That's why there are almost no White people as department heads in HKSAR government after the handover. Goof fluency of both English and Cantonese is required for people who want to work in the HKSAR government after 1997. Medical and some other professional graduates from other english-speaking countries are not automatically licenced in HK after 1997. Cambrdige and Oxford Medical degrees grauates can not practice in HK without going through a difficult licence exam for non-HK graduates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mack Knife View Post
There was no independence under British rule. There were no free elections either. The British installed whatever government they wanted and there was no say when it came time for new faces.

What the heck is everyone talking about?

The people living in Hong Kong never got to say what British governor was put in place. History people, history.

BTW, HK is part of China. Here we go, sticking our noses in yet another affair that isn't out business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 09:02 PM
 
73,019 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21932
I do not believe Hong Kong should go back to China. If anything, Hong Kong should be on its own. I know China won't just let this happen. However, if anything is best for Hong Kong, better is goes on its own, the way Singapore did. Hong Kong residents wants independence. However, I don't think the Communist party is what they had in mind. Hong Kong is different. It has operated differently. It was an entrepot for a long time, and it still is. It has a different economy, so why not go on its own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Czech Republic
2,351 posts, read 7,091,738 times
Reputation: 851
They should have just asked for independence when the UK left like Singapore and like Timor. Indonesia wanted Timor so badly right ? But at the end, they were not able to get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 09:28 PM
 
4 posts, read 5,355 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermosaa View Post
They should have just asked for independence when the UK left like Singapore and like Timor. Indonesia wanted Timor so badly right ? But at the end, they were not able to get it.
East Timor is not of the Dutch colonies but a country a Portuguese colonies , it's fair to give independence to the that country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 09:48 PM
 
73,019 posts, read 62,607,656 times
Reputation: 21932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermosaa View Post
They should have just asked for independence when the UK left like Singapore and like Timor. Indonesia wanted Timor so badly right ? But at the end, they were not able to get it.
I have been saying the same thing. Let Hong Kong go on its own. It could probably do better without China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2014, 11:31 PM
 
Location: Macao
16,259 posts, read 43,195,107 times
Reputation: 10258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermosaa View Post
They should have just asked for independence when the UK left like Singapore and like Timor. Indonesia wanted Timor so badly right ? But at the end, they were not able to get it.
Hong Kong's situation from the beginning was completely different from Singapore, East Timor, etc.

It was initially agreed that China would allow the British, and subsequently the Portuguese to build their city, but it was always understood that it belonged to China.

They basically gave them a LEASE to be there, and to have their own sovereign conditions, for a set number of years.

Hong Kong and Macau didn't suddenly just become 'independent' from the UK and Portugal respectively. They in essense went BACK to CHINA..which was the initial agreement way back 150+ years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 12:49 AM
 
1,418 posts, read 2,547,221 times
Reputation: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger Beer View Post
Hong Kong's situation from the beginning was completely different from Singapore, East Timor, etc.

It was initially agreed that China would allow the British, and subsequently the Portuguese to build their city, but it was always understood that it belonged to China.

They basically gave them a LEASE to be there, and to have their own sovereign conditions, for a set number of years.

Hong Kong and Macau didn't suddenly just become 'independent' from the UK and Portugal respectively. They in essense went BACK to CHINA..which was the initial agreement way back 150+ years ago.



They could argue the agreements were made under a different gov't possibly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-03-2014, 01:34 AM
 
9,229 posts, read 9,758,341 times
Reputation: 3316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mistertee View Post
They could argue the agreements were made under a different gov't possibly?
In principle, China government (both ROC and PRC) refused to recognize "any unfair treaties" between Qing dynasty and foreign countries. In other words, those treaties were not legal in their view.

The old generation of Hong Kong do consider themselves Chinese and did not really fight against the reunion. Many of them were born in mainland China, and almost all of their parents were born in mainland China. They were not fed with western values either.

The problem now is (1) some young people are fully westernized and want "democracy" (2) some young people do not like China and mainland Chinese.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Asia

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top