Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-10-2014, 01:49 AM
 
10,396 posts, read 11,500,133 times
Reputation: 7830

Advertisements

North Fulton also may not necessarily be the only outlying area that wants 'All Aboard' for MARTA expansion.

On Tuesday at the Georgia Transportation Summit in Athens, Georgia Lt. Governor Casey Cagle, who is the early favorite in the 2018 Gubernatorial Campaign, hinted at some type of state intervention into MARTA in the form of a possible state-led reorganization of MARTA.

From Tuesday's "Political Insider" blog in the Atlanta Journal Constitution:
Quote:
The lieutenant governor pointed to Cobb and Forsyth counties, whose voters recently voted to extend (in Cobb) a sales tax or (in Forsyth) approved a bond referendum aimed at transportation fixes. He spoke of establishing an infrastructure bank to pay for big ticket fixes. But then Cagle said this:
“But I will tell you, too, we cannot avoid the issue of transit as well. I believe very strongly that we have an infrastructure that exists with MARTA that can be capitalized on. But in the same way that we saw with Grady [Memorial Hospital], Grady did not have a sustainable financial model. And it needed to be reorganized and reconstituted in a way that created an opportunity….”
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2014/12...ue-of-transit/

Lt. Governor Cagle's comments illustrate that some type of state intervention into MARTA (whether in the form of a forced state takeover of MARTA at the behest of transit-hungry business interests in North Fulton, Cobb and Gwinnett counties, or a more friendly type of large-scale partnering with the agency by the state) is not necessarily as improbable as it may have seemed in the past.

With the 21st Century real estate market and overall business environment increasingly emphasizing access to transit, traditionally transit-averse OTP suburbanites (particularly in North Fulton, Cobb and Gwinnett) suddenly have much more of a close interest in a transit agency like MARTA than they did in years' past when highway access was the geographical factor that drove and dominated the Metro Atlanta real estate market.

The political interests in Fulton and DeKalb counties that have controlled MARTA for the first four-and-a-half decades of the transit agency's existence need to be aware that their political control of MARTA may not be as firm as it may seem to be to many, even with the addition of Clayton County to the transit agency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-10-2014, 06:52 AM
 
10,974 posts, read 10,875,645 times
Reputation: 3435
Good thoughts Born 2 Roll, I will be interested in seeing what they propose. The Gov and Lt Gov are being a bit coy so far. I almost read the MARTA comments as that they are reconsidering the funding source, maybe something more than just a sales tax. Of course it is all speculation at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2014, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, Birmingham, Charlotte, and Raleigh
2,580 posts, read 2,485,733 times
Reputation: 1614
The addition of Clayton County is showing that MARTA is a desirable entity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2014, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Formerly NYC by week; ATL by weekend...now Rio bi annually and ATL bi annually
1,522 posts, read 2,244,620 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by aries4118 View Post
Medical Center
OK so thats 3. Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2014, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,866,786 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by jero23 View Post
The addition of Clayton County is showing that MARTA is a desirable entity.
I think once Clayton gets enhanced transit service, it'll entice other counties. The proposed bus service is already better than cct and gct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-10-2014, 11:04 AM
 
32,026 posts, read 36,788,671 times
Reputation: 13311
Rock on, North Fulton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top