Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-11-2016, 09:48 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,854,509 times
Reputation: 5703

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
Why can't we do both? Continue to improve the transit services in Atlanta, and also reach out to Cobb and Gwinnett with awesome sales brochures of different options of transit configurations, of "FYI, here's what all we could do for you with a 1% tax". A PDF document doesn't cost a ton of money to produce. Just need some renderings and potential transit maps, and a few facts pulled straight from Wikipedia.

Everyone keeps saying, oh they'll join when they're ready. But why would they join? How can they get excited about a product that they can't see or read or get any information about? Talking about the population, not just county leaders.
It is not the document that costs money, but the planning and studies to produce those maps. MARTA cannot, responsibly, create a map and handout of some lines without doing LPA, etc.
As someone who lives in Cobb and want this, I encourage you to write Bob Ott and your leaders about this idea of joining MARTA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2016, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,691,755 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Why spend Atlanta, Fulton, DeKalb, and Clayton Counties taxpayer money on creating plans for counties that do not want the service? MARTA created a well thought out plan for North Fulton that did not go anywhere. The plans would just have to get updated every few years, costing the agency more money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnsleyPark View Post
Agreed. Use the costs of high priced studies and marketing to improve the service in the currently served jurisdictions. Other than monetary costs, these things also consume a lot of worker hours, as well. Gwinnett, Cobb and others will eventually come around. Meanwhile, work to make MARTA the best it can be in Fulton, Dekalb and Clayton.
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanConquistador View Post
Agreed.
Regional connectivity benefits every one in the system, not just those freshly added. There is benefit to Fulton, DeKalb, and CoA for having transit extended out into Cobb and Gwinnett, the only two counties such fact sheets are really meant for.

MARTA has both the labor and financial capabilities to pull them off without much impact into their other projects. It wouldn't be anything as specific as choosing routes for the high-capacity routes (no, East-West-East style designations), simply corridors where the high-capacity routes would most likely go.

There is zero reason why an agency as large as MARTA can't continue to improve in existing service areas and plan things for the future.

I mean, how long, how many man hours, and how much money did it take for MARTA to produce their preliminary plan for Clayton? How long, how many man hours, and how much money did it take for MARTA to produce their preliminary plan for the increased sales tax in Fulton?

I'm willing to be to terribly long, not terribly many, and not terribly much, especially when you consider that there's probably a decent amount of internal planning that has already taken place.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skbl17 View Post
Unfortunately, the county commissions in question will then say, "See, MARTA's initiated an advertising push in areas they don't serve! That's an irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars by an irresponsible agency!", backed up by the throngs of AJC commenters who think that MARTA brings drugs and crime. Of course, fact sheets aren't an advertising push, but opponents would see it that way.

Never mind the facts. The facts (the KSU study) didn't stop the successful push by a certain North Fulton politician to kill SB 330, and the facts won't make the Tim Lees and Charlotte Nashs of the world budge.

I agree with AnsleyPark here. Improve the service in existing jurisdictions first.

- skbl17
And while MARTA has been concentrating on its existing counties those same politicians have been calling for an agency with real, regional potential. One that's planning real regional connectivity. There is literally no way to win with the politicians, so I say screw 'em. Target the people.

The stir you'd get with well publicized regional plans would be pretty great, and it might just be enough to turn the voting tide, or at least give people a chance to think about their options. It would certainly shut down things like the Gwinnett County leaders' statements about MARTA being 'too expensive', and the like.

Again, there's no reason MARTA can't just keep moving on with what it's doing and make preliminary corridor and financial information for those counties that are not part of the system.


Better yet, make it a real part of their website, where they can have a map (in, like, Google maps) up with all the planned projects and routes up at once. Include all the bus routes and stops, with real-time arrival data if you click on one, like in the current MARTA app.

Show potential corridors, as well as the current LPAs. Show where single tracking and track repair is going on. Show how bus routes will be modified in the near future, and show where ART routes, bus centers, infill stations, etc. would go. You can use it for navigation, as well as seeing the plans, with layers to turn on and off.

Pull a Midtown and allow people to drop comments onto the map to point out broken stops, overflowing trash bins, potential art sites, where they'd like a bus stop to be, etc. Make it into as much a map as it would be an advertising piece as it would be a community input tool.

Bam, just turned the 'waste of current couties' tax payer money' into a tool for those counties.


Seriously, just because MARTA shouldn't be begging counties to join it, doesn't mean it shouldn't still show off why it's a good business partner. For the same reason that I would be okay with this, I'm okay with ad campaigns targeted at improving ridership and showing off what opportunities are available on the agency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,854,509 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
Regional connectivity benefits every one in the system, not just those freshly added. There is benefit to Fulton, DeKalb, and CoA for having transit extended out into Cobb and Gwinnett, the only two counties such fact sheets are really meant for.

MARTA has both the labor and financial capabilities to pull them off without much impact into their other projects. It wouldn't be anything as specific as choosing routes for the high-capacity routes (no, East-West-East style designations), simply corridors where the high-capacity routes would most likely go.

There is zero reason why an agency as large as MARTA can't continue to improve in existing service areas and plan things for the future.

I mean, how long, how many man hours, and how much money did it take for MARTA to produce their preliminary plan for Clayton? How long, how many man hours, and how much money did it take for MARTA to produce their preliminary plan for the increased sales tax in Fulton?

I'm willing to be to terribly long, not terribly many, and not terribly much, especially when you consider that there's probably a decent amount of internal planning that has already taken place.



And while MARTA has been concentrating on its existing counties those same politicians have been calling for an agency with real, regional potential. One that's planning real regional connectivity. There is literally no way to win with the politicians, so I say screw 'em. Target the people.

The stir you'd get with well publicized regional plans would be pretty great, and it might just be enough to turn the voting tide, or at least give people a chance to think about their options. It would certainly shut down things like the Gwinnett County leaders' statements about MARTA being 'too expensive', and the like.

Again, there's no reason MARTA can't just keep moving on with what it's doing and make preliminary corridor and financial information for those counties that are not part of the system.


Better yet, make it a real part of their website, where they can have a map (in, like, Google maps) up with all the planned projects and routes up at once. Include all the bus routes and stops, with real-time arrival data if you click on one, like in the current MARTA app.

Show potential corridors, as well as the current LPAs. Show where single tracking and track repair is going on. Show how bus routes will be modified in the near future, and show where ART routes, bus centers, infill stations, etc. would go. You can use it for navigation, as well as seeing the plans, with layers to turn on and off.

Pull a Midtown and allow people to drop comments onto the map to point out broken stops, overflowing trash bins, potential art sites, where they'd like a bus stop to be, etc. Make it into as much a map as it would be an advertising piece as it would be a community input tool.

Bam, just turned the 'waste of current couties' tax payer money' into a tool for those counties.


Seriously, just because MARTA shouldn't be begging counties to join it, doesn't mean it shouldn't still show off why it's a good business partner. For the same reason that I would be okay with this, I'm okay with ad campaigns targeted at improving ridership and showing off what opportunities are available on the agency.
The best way MARTA can show off it is a good business partner is to keep growing it's reserves, keep balanced budgets, and continue to improve the on-time performance while reinvesting in it's infrastructure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,691,755 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
The best way MARTA can show off it is a good business partner is to keep growing it's reserves, keep balanced budgets, and continue to improve the on-time performance while reinvesting in it's infrastructure.
Which can be done at the same time that an ad campaign and showcase goes on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,854,509 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
Which can be done at the same time that an ad campaign and showcase goes on.
Would residents and county leaders not see MARTA's 'ads' and corridor plan as a threat since they got 0 input on the plan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:42 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,750,395 times
Reputation: 1967
Begging COBB is like a man begging a female year after year and she keeps saying no
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,854,509 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by fieldm View Post
Begging COBB is like a man begging a female year after year and she keeps saying no
Yea, we should really break up with that fat girl. #EastSnobb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,691,755 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Would residents and county leaders not see MARTA's 'ads' and corridor plan as a threat since they got 0 input on the plan?
If they bothered to talk to MARTA, then they'd have had input. If they come to talk to MARTA, they can have input. Until then, MARTA stands by its statement that it won't come to the counties, just wait until they decide to come to MARTA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 02:58 PM
 
4,010 posts, read 3,750,395 times
Reputation: 1967
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Yea, we should really break up with that fat girl. #EastSnobb
That guy now is in his 30s with a great job with good benefits. She on the other hand lost her job with 3 kids by 3 men. That guy will soon be looking good to her once the divorce is final next spring
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2016, 03:13 PM
bu2
 
24,073 posts, read 14,866,916 times
Reputation: 12919
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
It is not the document that costs money, but the planning and studies to produce those maps. MARTA cannot, responsibly, create a map and handout of some lines without doing LPA, etc.
As someone who lives in Cobb and want this, I encourage you to write Bob Ott and your leaders about this idea of joining MARTA.
MARTA isn't doing LPAs outside its service area. The counties or ARC are funding those sorts of things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top