Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will Cobb and Gwinnett get MARTA?
Yes they will fairly soon 14 28.00%
Yes but not for a very long time 22 44.00%
No they never will 14 28.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:02 AM
 
9,008 posts, read 14,069,513 times
Reputation: 7643

Advertisements

Shocking that Gwinnett officials would drop the ball on something so important...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:30 AM
bu2
 
24,118 posts, read 14,913,477 times
Reputation: 12974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
Shocking that Gwinnett officials would drop the ball on something so important...
I thought it was a good plan.

What doesn't make sense is to spend billions of dollars and give people worse service. Beyond a certain distance, rail is just slower than express bus in HOT/HOV lanes because you have so many stops and it can't provide as good a service to the end destination.
(there are limited express trains to distant suburbs in places like Paris, but that is a whole separate system from the Paris metro, so you would be adding extra infrastructure instead of building on MARTA and that certainly couldn't be cost justified here).


Rail is only justified in that case when you need the extra capacity of rail. Gwinnett is not dense enough to justify rail to Suwanee, even commuter rail. And the dispersion of their jobs as Arjay showed means its difficult for rail to service. So a lot of people would be paying taxes and get little to no benefit. And as mentioned, the long time frame before "payoff" gave some people pause.

This plan would tend to generate jobs around the end of the rail station that could be served by rail coming out and express bus coming in. And it gave right-sized transit to the rest of the county.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:36 AM
 
9,008 posts, read 14,069,513 times
Reputation: 7643
It was a terrible plan because the stretch of road that needs an alternative more than any other in Gwinnett county is the portion of I-85 between I-285 and Pleasant Hill Road.

You can't do it with buses because they sit in the same traffic (the HOT lane often doesn't move any faster).

Rail extended to Infinite Energy Arena would also make that venue much more profitable by opening its performances up to a much broader intown audience.

No matter how you package it, you will never be able to sell voters a plan to make their commuting lives easier by putting more buses on the road.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:57 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,127,480 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
I thought it was a good plan.

What doesn't make sense is to spend billions of dollars and give people worse service. Beyond a certain distance, rail is just slower than express bus in HOT/HOV lanes because you have so many stops and it can't provide as good a service to the end destination.
(there are limited express trains to distant suburbs in places like Paris, but that is a whole separate system from the Paris metro, so you would be adding extra infrastructure instead of building on MARTA and that certainly couldn't be cost justified here).


Rail is only justified in that case when you need the extra capacity of rail. Gwinnett is not dense enough to justify rail to Suwanee, even commuter rail. And the dispersion of their jobs as Arjay showed means its difficult for rail to service. So a lot of people would be paying taxes and get little to no benefit. And as mentioned, the long time frame before "payoff" gave some people pause.

This plan would tend to generate jobs around the end of the rail station that could be served by rail coming out and express bus coming in. And it gave right-sized transit to the rest of the county.
If the plan that got shot down had rail going to Gwinnett Place (basically the 1990 plan) or IEA, it would've been much more palatable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 10:07 AM
 
32,031 posts, read 36,823,708 times
Reputation: 13311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
If the plan that got shot down had rail going to Gwinnett Place (basically the 1990 plan) or IEA, it would've been much more palatable.
I agree!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Scottdale, Ga
128 posts, read 105,662 times
Reputation: 508
I live in Gwinnett and I didn't vote to approve the MARTA deal. I am not a racist. I chose not to support a decades-long tax increase for possibly 4 miles of rail that I would never or only rarely use. Neither MARTA nor GC government has shown to be great stewards of taxpayer dollars.
I am certain some voters are racist but to say we were all motivated by racism is a flat-out lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 04:28 PM
 
4,406 posts, read 4,303,036 times
Reputation: 3907
Not sure why people are acting like racism is such a major factor. Gwinnett has bee a majority minority county for some time now. True racist should have moved out of Gwinnett a long time ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 07:33 PM
bu2
 
24,118 posts, read 14,913,477 times
Reputation: 12974
Quote:
Originally Posted by ATLTJL View Post
It was a terrible plan because the stretch of road that needs an alternative more than any other in Gwinnett county is the portion of I-85 between I-285 and Pleasant Hill Road.

You can't do it with buses because they sit in the same traffic (the HOT lane often doesn't move any faster).

Rail extended to Infinite Energy Arena would also make that venue much more profitable by opening its performances up to a much broader intown audience.

No matter how you package it, you will never be able to sell voters a plan to make their commuting lives easier by putting more buses on the road.
The HOV lane inside 285 does move faster. It doesn't move a lot faster sometimes after the 400 merge, but that can and should be fixed. Atlanta's HOV lanes are like a lot of stuff GDOT does, the cheapest way out, just putting down a stripe. Other places do HOV/HOT lanes much better and its not terribly expensive to improve.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:14 PM
bu2
 
24,118 posts, read 14,913,477 times
Reputation: 12974
https://reason.org/transportation-ne...sletter-185/#a

"Networks of variably priced express toll lanes (ETLs) are being developed in more than a dozen large metro areas, and their impact is starting to be reflected in the congestion figures for those regions. Before reviewing what is going on, I want to call your attention to a new (not yet published) paper on the subject by researchers from Cornell University and McGill University. “A Comprehensive Welfare Impact Analysis for Road Expansion Projects” uses transportation data from the Dallas-Ft. Worth metro area to compare, quantitatively, the effects of four possible highway expansion options (in addition to doing nothing): adding a general purpose (GP) lane, adding a high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, adding a priced ETL, or converting all lanes to conventional toll lanes. The priced ETL ranked highest in both regional economic impact and improving system-wide travel time, and was judged to produce the greatest increase in overall social welfare.

Those results are not yet widely known, which may be why ill-informed opposition still exists to some of the proposed projects. But overall, the picture is one of considerable progress toward entire ETL networks in some of America’s most-congested metro areas. Here is a brief recap as of first-quarter 2018...."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 09:48 PM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,163,707 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by sciblue View Post
I live in Gwinnett and I didn't vote to approve the MARTA deal. I am not a racist. I chose not to support a decades-long tax increase for possibly 4 miles of rail that I would never or only rarely use. Neither MARTA nor GC government has shown to be great stewards of taxpayer dollars.
I am certain some voters are racist but to say we were all motivated by racism is a flat-out lie.
If there had been a lot more rail in the plan, would you have voted for the expansion?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top