Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-03-2014, 01:38 AM
 
3,223 posts, read 10,096,881 times
Reputation: 2227

Advertisements

I personally consider 1971 to be a very underrated year for classic cars and some of my favorite cars were built in that year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-03-2014, 01:56 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Yes, there were quite a few cars that were still good in 1971. Emissions equipment did not yet quite take over the entire engine!

My "top 5" cars from 1971 would read like this...

1. Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine
2. Dodge Charger R/T 440-4 bbl (easier to live with than the Hemi)
3. Lincoln Continental four-door
4. Dodge Demon 340-4 bbl
5. Oldsmobile 4-4-2 with 455-4 bbl engine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 02:07 AM
 
3,223 posts, read 10,096,881 times
Reputation: 2227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Yes, there were quite a few cars that were still good in 1971. Emissions equipment did not yet quite take over the entire engine!

My "top 5" cars from 1971 would read like this...

1. Cadillac Fleetwood Seventy-Five Limousine
2. Dodge Charger R/T 440-4 bbl (easier to live with than the Hemi)
3. Lincoln Continental four-door
4. Dodge Demon 340-4 bbl
5. Oldsmobile 4-4-2 with 455-4 bbl engine
I'm glad I'm not the only one who prefers the 440-4bbl over the Hemi, I've always liked the 440's a lot, I agree Emissions equipment didn't take over the entire engine like it would a couple years later on most of the cars.

My "Top 5" cars from 1971 are

1. Mercury Marquis
2. Dodge Challenger R/T
3. Plymouth GTX
4. Oldsmobile 4-4-2
5. Chrysler New Yorker four door
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 02:07 AM
 
Location: San Antonio, Texas
4,287 posts, read 8,027,771 times
Reputation: 3938
A relative owned a 1971 Cadillac Eldorado convertible with the 8.2-litre engine. I loved driving that beast & miss it. A truly amazing car.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 02:20 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mopac1980 View Post
I'm glad I'm not the only one who prefers the 440-4bbl over the Hemi, I've always liked the 440's a lot, I agree Emissions equipment didn't take over the entire engine like it would a couple years later on most of the cars.

My "Top 5" cars from 1971 are

1. Mercury Marquis
2. Dodge Challenger R/T
3. Plymouth GTX
4. Oldsmobile 4-4-2
5. Chrysler New Yorker four door
Yes, the 440 was more practical. And they have more low-end torque than the Hemi.

Your top 5 list looks good to me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 02:27 AM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet View Post
A relative owned a 1971 Cadillac Eldorado convertible with the 8.2-litre engine. I loved driving that beast & miss it. A truly amazing car.
I know someone who owns a '71 and '75 Eldorado Convertible. The '71 is in very good condition...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 03:38 AM
 
1,320 posts, read 3,701,389 times
Reputation: 961
I think that 455 was known as the Rocket engine. We had one in our 71 or72 Delta 88. 7.1 liter if I remember. Loved the body on those when they came out in 71. All the big sedans including LaSabre, Caprice and Catalina were nice looking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 06:00 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,550 posts, read 81,117,303 times
Reputation: 57755
Yes, and besides smog, 1973 and 74 brought those big fat ugly bumpers to meet new crash standards, ruining the appearance of many cars.

My favorite, the 1971 El Camino


The ugly 1974:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 06:00 AM
 
17,294 posts, read 22,013,755 times
Reputation: 29643
71 was also a turning point on cars, Chevelle/Mustang were both way better looking in 70 than 71!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2014, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,833,054 times
Reputation: 41863
While some cars were still ok in 71, generally, that was the turning point when things went downhill. Compression and hp were dropping and more and more pollution equipment was being bolted on.

Pretty much, I don't care for any "muscle car" after 1970.

Don
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top