Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-28-2019, 05:34 PM
 
2,486 posts, read 1,420,936 times
Reputation: 3123

Advertisements

Problem is that some cars are better than others.The new gm high buck trucks for example (50 to 60k price) have a bug in their transmissions that the owners are being stuck with no recall and little service to fix it from GM. Look for car models with a proven dependability history and expect. the 200k
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-28-2019, 06:41 PM
 
Location: West Des Moines
1,275 posts, read 1,249,964 times
Reputation: 1724
Quote:
Originally Posted by corolla5speed View Post
Great point timing chain will last the engines lifetime compared to a timing belt. Timing belts are have a low mileage guaranteed failure point that comes at high cost. Make sure the new car you select has a timing chain rather then a timing belt.
Timing belts are fairly inexpensive -- parts and labor -- so for most cars $600-$1000 every 100k miles, or 0.6-1.0 cents per mile.

Timing chains are complex and difficult to replace. They might last 100k miles, or 200k miles, or 300k miles. There's no way to predict how long. Should you replace them before they fail, or just pray that they don't? If the chain fails, however, you probably won't be able to salvage the engine.

I prefer the predictability of timing belts. Replace them when you should, and have the work done by someone who knows what he's doing, and you can expect a very long-lasting engine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Cebu, Philippines
5,869 posts, read 4,213,146 times
Reputation: 10942
I would expect engine/trans to outlast the functional life of the car, such as body hardware, AC, brakes, steering, suspension, cooling, etc' Almost every car I ever walked away from still had good serviceable (if not perfect) engime/trans but were otherwise scrap..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 07:22 PM
 
Location: plano
7,891 posts, read 11,415,814 times
Reputation: 7800
100k trouble free meaning not just no breakdown of these systems but not repair or replacements either. Just no breakdowns? 250k
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 07:25 PM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,486 posts, read 6,188,113 times
Reputation: 4584
200,000 miles. My 2011 Honda Accord at 138k is well on its way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Newburyport, MA
12,470 posts, read 9,550,156 times
Reputation: 15924
Assuming a 2019 car is not flogged and it's maintained as per the automaker's recommendations, I'd expect an average car to go at least 150K miles without a motor/tranny rebuild, a good car at least 200K miles, and a great car at least 250K miles. Note that this is "at least", not when I'd absolutely expect them to break down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 08:28 PM
 
6,353 posts, read 11,596,358 times
Reputation: 6314
I bought a 100 k mfr warranty with add-ons like a rental car so 100k would be trouble free.

After that it's just gravy. I paid a little over half price for a 2 yr old car so is that comparable to a car reliable to 160K bought brand new?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 08:35 PM
 
Location: Here and there, you decide.
12,908 posts, read 28,001,815 times
Reputation: 5057
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Baustian View Post
Timing belts are fairly inexpensive -- parts and labor -- so for most cars $600-$1000 every 100k miles, or 0.6-1.0 cents per mile.

Timing chains are complex and difficult to replace. They might last 100k miles, or 200k miles, or 300k miles. There's no way to predict how long. Should you replace them before they fail, or just pray that they don't? If the chain fails, however, you probably won't be able to salvage the engine.

I prefer the predictability of timing belts. Replace them when you should, and have the work done by someone who knows what he's doing, and you can expect a very long-lasting engine.
I’ve never had an issue with a timing chain. It’s the timing belt that breaks or jumps and that bends the valves and you need an engine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2019, 09:23 PM
 
1,254 posts, read 1,059,499 times
Reputation: 3077
Quote:
Originally Posted by airics View Post
It’s the timing belt that breaks or jumps and that bends the valves and you need an engine

Only on poorly designed engines. As I have posted before, the timing belt snapped on my 1993 Geo Prizm while on the freeway going 70. All it needed was a timing belt. It is those Hyundai's and Kia's that you love that are the problem, not timing belts breaking. Toyota designed it so the valves won't hit the pistons if the belt breaks. That is why you never see 1993 Hyundai's or Kia's driving around. They are throw away cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2019, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,552,235 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by J Baustian View Post
Timing belts are fairly inexpensive -- parts and labor -- so for most cars $600-$1000 every 100k miles, or 0.6-1.0 cents per mile.

Timing chains are complex and difficult to replace. They might last 100k miles, or 200k miles, or 300k miles. There's no way to predict how long. Should you replace them before they fail, or just pray that they don't? If the chain fails, however, you probably won't be able to salvage the engine.

I prefer the predictability of timing belts. Replace them when you should, and have the work done by someone who knows what he's doing, and you can expect a very long-lasting engine.
There is no difference in complexity or difficulty of replacing a timing chain vs a belt. Regardless of a chain or belt fails the engine is done. The advantage of a chain is that you simply don’t have the maintenance schedule of a belt. A chain will start getting noisy as it stretches so you get a warning it needs work. A chain may need replacement at 200k. Most of the time a engine fails from lack of maintenance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top