Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-14-2011, 03:57 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
16,911 posts, read 10,596,615 times
Reputation: 16439

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
The government can take your constitutional rights away from you, and they can do it legally. The constitution may be amended, and it has been 27 times.
Actually, the government can't take all of your rights away, even if they amend the Constitution. That's a myth. The constitution secures certain right but it is not the final arbiter of your rights as a person. You have certain inalienable rights. With respect to those rights, the constitution is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if the Constitution is amended, ignored or shredded. You still have certain rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:01 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,875,929 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
Doesn't do the same thing ad a warrant would.
A NSL allows the FBI to spy on people for 'national security' reasons....and no warrant is needed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:06 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
A NSL allows the FBI to spy on people for 'national security' reasons....and no warrant is needed.
No it doesn't. It's a demand to third parties to turn over certain records, those records cannot be content based (when an email was sent, not the content of the email). Seriously, are you just making up as you go?

Also, the gag aspect was ruled unconstitutional.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:11 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
Actually, the government can't take all of your rights away, even if they amend the Constitution. That's a myth. The constitution secures certain right but it is not the final arbiter of your rights as a person. You have certain inalienable rights. With respect to those rights, the constitution is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if the Constitution is amended, ignored or shredded. You still have certain rights.
Maybe... But what are those inalienable rights? The constitution doesn't mention them, only the declaration of independence does. So I'm a bit skeptical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Earth Wanderer, longing for the stars.
12,406 posts, read 18,976,948 times
Reputation: 8912
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
So what is the difference between this and the police helicopters and planes outside of no pilot

CCTV monitored by police used on almost every street corner in large cities?

LMAO, the difference?

With UAV's there is no overtime or medical benefits or union dues...
High speed chases endanger innocent civilians, not to mention those being chased and the police. I would rather, if it were feasible, have people tracked by drones. Cars even try to avoid helicopters. Think of how drones could track a suspected terrorist right to his base.

After 911 this country appears to have a lot less crime and I suspect it is in part due to devices that we are just now starting to be made aware of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:18 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
High speed chases endanger innocent civilians, not to mention those being chased and the police. I would rather, if it were feasible, have people tracked by drones. Cars even try to avoid helicopters. Think of how drones could track a suspected terrorist right to his base.

After 911 this country appears to have a lot less crime and I suspect it is in part due to devices that we are just now starting to be made aware of.
Video games?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:23 PM
 
45,231 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24990
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
High speed chases endanger innocent civilians, not to mention those being chased and the police. I would rather, if it were feasible, have people tracked by drones. Cars even try to avoid helicopters. Think of how drones could track a suspected terrorist right to his base.

After 911 this country appears to have a lot less crime and I suspect it is in part due to devices that we are just now starting to be made aware of.
Cite?

Why should three hundred million americans be treated as "suspected terrorists" because of a singular incident?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,458,697 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
Actually, the government can't take all of your rights away, even if they amend the Constitution. That's a myth. The constitution secures certain right but it is not the final arbiter of your rights as a person. You have certain inalienable rights. With respect to those rights, the constitution is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if the Constitution is amended, ignored or shredded. You still have certain rights.
You are correct. All that can be done through the amendment process is the removal of the constitutional protections granted. The US Constitution never granted any of our inherent rights in the first place, therefore, it cannot revoke them either.

Eliminating the First Amendment, for example, does not mean that we cannot speak our minds. It only means that we no longer have the protection of the US Constitution when we do speak our minds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
Maybe... But what are those inalienable rights? The constitution doesn't mention them, only the declaration of independence does. So I'm a bit skeptical.
Actually, the US Constitution does mention some of them. Amendments one through eight cover specific inherent rights, and the Ninth Amendment acknowledges that not all the rights listed in the first eight amendments is the limit to our rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 05:02 PM
 
1,569 posts, read 2,044,851 times
Reputation: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
You are correct. All that can be done through the amendment process is the removal of the constitutional protections granted. The US Constitution never granted any of our inherent rights in the first place, therefore, it cannot revoke them either.

Eliminating the First Amendment, for example, does not mean that we cannot speak our minds. It only means that we no longer have the protection of the US Constitution when we do speak our minds.



Actually, the US Constitution does mention some of them. Amendments one through eight cover specific inherent rights, and the Ninth Amendment acknowledges that not all the rights listed in the first eight amendments is the limit to our rights.
Who says they're inherent and inalienable? If that was the case, why are amendments necessary? Amendments that can be revoked.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,458,697 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by rimmerama View Post
Who says they're inherent and inalienable? If that was the case, why are amendments necessary? Amendments that can be revoked.
They were not included at all initially, because it was believed that the State Constitutions would be sufficient to protect our inherent rights. They were only added on after-the-fact at the insistence of Virginia and New York in order to get their ratification of the US Constitution.

You may find it more difficult than you think to "revoke" any of the first eight amendments. At least 38 State legislatures would have to agree to revoke or repeal the "Bill of Rights."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top