Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-03-2010, 01:41 PM
 
5,697 posts, read 4,093,071 times
Reputation: 4995

Advertisements

Just going by the data an "expert" gave me--you. And it's interesting to note, as the title of this thread is all about, Yes, Buffalo was rated #1 dieing city and Albany was also in the top 10. Both having more TV's than Rochester. I guess we have better things to do than watch TV. I look more to the health of an area at GDP-gross domestic product- the amount of economic activity of a certain area. 44 billion compared to 40 billion. Also the accessed value of the tiny city of Rochester equals the huge city of Buffalo. I also like how your expert anaysis works. Comparing data using population figures of one city from the year 2000 to another (wrong data) of 2010. Kinda gives you experts a black eye, fudging the figures like that.

In actuality if you read my posts on the other threads I always advocate that Buffalo and Rochester should forge closer ties with each other and gain more political clout. That never seems to happen mostly do to attitudes like your's. Look where it's gotten you-lost 400,000 people in the past 40-50 years while Rochester has gained 300,000 people during the same period. Like I said before, without Rochester, there would be no Bills, no Sabres, a lot fewer people, and all the things that you boast of being a big city. Talk about biting the hand...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2010, 07:21 PM
 
744 posts, read 1,768,523 times
Reputation: 526
It's been my career for over 20 years!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 09:40 AM
 
209 posts, read 538,691 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by donbuy View Post
* First it's Pittsburgh with an H.

* Secondly the projects cited (except the airport) were within the City of Pittsburgh, 2000 population 323,000 which is comparable to the City of Buffalo, 2000 population 296,000. Allegheny County has a population of about 1.1 million and Erie with a population of 960,000 (both are 2000 numbers) are comparable in size. Both are struggling cities that have lost half of their population since 1950. Pittsburgh is #22, Buffalo # 38 and Rochester #53 as far as urban size is concerned - see link USA Urbanized Areas: 2000 Ranked by Population(465 Areas)

As far as I am concerned Rochester City pop 195,000 county pop 700,000 is simply in a lower league altogether you are free to believe otherwise that is your option. You can compare to what you want to and i can compare to what I want to. We still have at least that much freedom in this country... for now at least.

* Third - many Buffalonians tend to compare Buffalo with Cleveland and Pittsburgh. They do in the newspaper on Buffalo Rising and elsewhere. Rightly or wrongly that is just the way it is.

* Lastly - I lived in Pittsburgh for many years and know it like the back of my hand.
I agree with Donbuy. I live in Pittsburgh now. What I wouldn't do to move away.

One of the smartest things Pittsburgh did was locate the stadiums downtown. The North Shore is an example of what Buffalo could and should be.

I can attest that Pittsburgh compares itself to Buffalo on an ongoing basis. Along with Cleveland.

The crazy thing about Pittsburgh is that although is has recently added some great things to it's city and to Ross Park Mall, it still has a rural-redneckiness (not sure that's a word....) something Buffalo (thankfully) does not have.

So it snows in Buffalo. Get over it - it snows worse in a ton of other places.
I cannot even begin to list the many things Buffalo has going for it that people who live there seem to ignore.

For one thing - it's on a grid system. Try living in Pittsburgh where it takes you 30 minutes to get to the closest highway. The average speed limit here is 25. Add to that no shoulder of the road, extreme curves and hills and you having a driving disaster.

Buffalo is never going to be a blue collar town again. I doubt any city in the US will ever be a blue collar town again. It may not be by choice, it's definitely by necessity. But that doesn't have to be a bad thing.

There will always be a certain amount of blue collar jobs everywhere - that's ok. Just try not to make them a priority here in Buffalo.

That said, Buffalo needs to quit looking back and trying to become what it once was and start to conform. It has a beautiful waterfront - what's been done with it?

The suburbs of Buffalo are terrific. Things are convenient and there are many shopping areas. ANd they are not located on one street.......

Stop complaining and embrace the change. Get rid of all the shoddy old buildings and those ugly grain elevators.

Until you stop living in the past, there is no way you will ever be able to move into the future.

Buffalo is great - you just have to embrace change. There is more to love about Buffalo than you seem to realize.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 03:08 PM
 
744 posts, read 1,768,523 times
Reputation: 526
I do not see how you can say Pittsburgh is doing better than Bflo when 1 Allegheny Cty has lost a larger percentage of population loss than Erie Cty over the past decade 2) Pgh unemployment rate is higher 3] Pgh is still under a Hard control board 4) Pgh per capita income has decreased at a rate 3 times Buffal's since the recession has started and 5) their housing prices have dropped over the past two years while Buffalo's have increased.
I just do not see any CURRENT data supporting your assertion.I think you have been hoodwinked by a few shiny new government funded projects,
If Buffalo wants to choose pther cities as role models then it should choose successful ones like Louisville or Minneapolis mot Pittsburgh or Cleveland

Last edited by donbuy; 09-06-2010 at 04:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2010, 07:30 PM
 
93,306 posts, read 123,941,088 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by donbuy View Post
I do not see how you can say Pittsburgh is doing better than Bflo when 1 Allegheny Cty has lost a larger percentage of population loss than Erie Cty over the past decade 2) Pgh unemployment rate is higher 3] Pgh is still under a Hard control board 4) Pgh per capita income has decreased at a rate 3 times Buffal's since the recession has started and 5) their housing prices have dropped over the past two years while Buffalo's have increased.
I just do not see any CURRENT data supporting your assertion.I think you have been hoodwinked by a few shiny new government funded projects,
If Buffalo wants to choose pther cities as role models then it should choose successful ones like Louisville or Minneapolis mot Pittsburgh or Cleveland
St. Louis might be another city that Buffalo could look at, as it is starting to revive parts of the city and Downtown that had been declining. Providence could also be another possible example of reviving parts of a city that had been declining as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:00 AM
 
744 posts, read 1,768,523 times
Reputation: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by donbuy View Post
Toledo only has about a 650k in its metro. I don't think Buffalo is wrll served by trying to compare itself to other sick metros.
Corrections:
Toledo only has 503,008 in its urbanized area, where it ranks number 71 smaller even than Rochester and only about half the size of Buffalo. At a half million it lacks the critical mass to be a useful comparison. Plus I don't think Buffalo is well served by trying to compare itself to other sick metros.

USA Urbanized Areas: 2000 Ranked by Population(465 Areas)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-07-2010, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Buffalo, NY
3,575 posts, read 3,077,378 times
Reputation: 9795
Just a comment about density. The year I was born, Buffalo had already dropped from it's peak population. On my block in North Buffalo, I estimate that the 14 houses surrounding my house held 73 residents. There were families of 3, 4 and 5 kids squeezed into 1200 sf 3 bedroom 1 bathroom homes (I shared a 9 X 10 bedroom with my 2 brothers, for example). Only 5 of the 14 houses were doubles, so the population per residence on my block was 3.84 persons per residence.

Today, on the same block, I estimate that there are only 31 people, or 1.63 persons per residence. Of these 14 houses, there are no school age children (there are a few in adjacent houses, just so you know that they are still around). All of the houses are occupied, but 3 of the 5 doubles are only occupied by 1 family.

The rate of drop in density approximates the drop in total population of the city since I was born.

As much as I like the housing itself, most families today would prefer to have larger homes to raise their children if they could afford it. I do not believe there is such a thing as "obsolete" housing stock, but the lack of updating and expansion is very limiting to people who want to raise a family today, as much larger houses are more readily available than in the past.

In general, the homes in the neighborhood are very well maintained. But, there has been very little improvement over the decades, with very few expansions, bathroom additions, or even (gasp) teardowns which are prevalent in growing cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 06:34 AM
 
744 posts, read 1,768,523 times
Reputation: 526
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthBound47 View Post

Tell me if I am off base, and if I am, I apologize if I offended you.
You are off base. I am simply saying if we are going to benchmark ourselves against other cities why insist upon using other sick cities such as Cincy and Memphis. Why not benchmark against successful cities such as Salt Lake City, Minneapolis and Portland! If I was in a rock band I would look to how the Beatles became successful and not to a one hit wonder like the Neon Philhamonic (I think I just channeled Dennis Miller's vague pop reference vault)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 07:05 AM
 
1 posts, read 2,416 times
Reputation: 15
I am one of those Buffalonians who left after college. I return every year for Christmas, and last year visited the Zoo, Albright-Knox, Burchfield Center and went shopping on the West Side. I had great time. I wouldn't say the city is completely dead - just parts of it are.
if you look at the rest of the cities and towns in NY, we're exactly the same as them, just bigger. I never thought of Buffalo as a big city; I thought of it as a bigger Batavia (with some unfortunate bad neighborhoods thrown in).
I was born in Buffalo in 1972, log after the city center's heyday, so maybe I just don't expect the same out of the city as so,done who was around in it's glory days.
I love Buffalo, it still is home to me, ecven though I'm an ocean away. I hope to return to the area someday to live - the restaurants are fantastic!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2010, 11:42 AM
 
209 posts, read 538,691 times
Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by donbuy View Post
I do not see how you can say Pittsburgh is doing better than Bflo when 1 Allegheny Cty has lost a larger percentage of population loss than Erie Cty over the past decade 2) Pgh unemployment rate is higher 3] Pgh is still under a Hard control board 4) Pgh per capita income has decreased at a rate 3 times Buffal's since the recession has started and 5) their housing prices have dropped over the past two years while Buffalo's have increased.
I just do not see any CURRENT data supporting your assertion.I think you have been hoodwinked by a few shiny new government funded projects,
If Buffalo wants to choose pther cities as role models then it should choose successful ones like Louisville or Minneapolis mot Pittsburgh or Cleveland
I'm sorry, where did I say I thought Pittsurgh was better than Buffalo???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top