Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-16-2019, 06:39 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,721 posts, read 26,798,919 times
Reputation: 24785

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
More leave for other States than move in from other States.

Growth is birth and foreign immigration, both legal and illegal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
The point is only about Americans not moving to CA causing growth, as more move out, but birth, which keeps occurring, foreign immigration and that includes illegals
NOT TRUE. Why do you continue to state this?

California's birth rate is at a historical low.

California had its slowest recorded growth rate in its history last year as the country's most populous state was hit by a slowdown in immigration and a sharp decline of births:
https://www.kpbs.org/news/2019/may/0...th-rate-calif/

https://www.sacbee.com/news/californ...211330979.html

After decades of rapid growth, the number of immigrants has leveled off
https://www.ppic.org/publication/imm...in-california/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
You keep saying this .... over and over and over ... The fact is: the population is growing. Not just by births (which are down). People. From wherever. Keep. Coming. In spite of the COL. Period.

Oh and, no, the growth from immigration is not by illegals. Illegal immigration numbers are in decline.
Exactly.

Last edited by CA4Now; 09-16-2019 at 06:49 AM..

 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:05 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,845 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reziac View Post
Here it is already conveniently calculated... cost of living, Los Angeles vs Phoenix:

Moderator cut: link removed, competitor site

Comparison Highlights
- Overall, Los Angeles, California is 72.0% more expensive than Phoenix, Arizona
- Median Home Cost is the biggest factor in the cost of living difference.
- Median Home Cost is 192% more expensive in Los Angeles.

Enter your Before and After cities for hours of fun!
Interesting except that I'm not sure why you would compare Phoenix to Los Angeles? Two can play this game...Phoenix is not even close to being the most expensive place to live in Arizona and it's not the most popular place to live in the state. For instance:

Los Angeles, California is 45.3% cheaper than Paradise Valley, Arizona

Sacramento, California is 14.3% cheaper than Scottsdale, Arizona

Sacramento, California is 34.6% cheaper than Los Angeles, California

Sacramento, California is 12.4% more expensive than Phoenix, Arizona

Last edited by Yac; 09-17-2019 at 06:30 AM..
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:11 AM
 
33,321 posts, read 12,511,334 times
Reputation: 14937
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
This is getting silly but ok, I'll play along for a bit.

Bakersfield, CA median home price $244,000 https://www.zillow.com/bakersfield-ca/home-values/

Susanville, CA median home price $179,400 https://www.zillow.com/susanville-ca/home-values/

Fresno, Ca median home price $243,500 https://www.zillow.com/fresno-ca/home-values/

San Bernardino Ca median home price $293,400 https://www.zillow.com/san-bernardino-ca/home-values/
You've got a decent point with San Berdoo, re cost and location. It's not that far from L.A. amenities, and the route is fairy flat, albeit congested. But I've never looked at the crime nor school stats there.

I don't think Susanville belongs with the others. It's way too isolated (I spent about a third of one summer when I was a kid at Eagle Lake, which is outside of Susanville). One could pick some equally isolated place in Texas with lower home values.

Fresno has Clovis, etc., and access to skiing at China Peak, but it's too far away from amenities in the Bay Area and L.A. (sports teams and particular museums, to name two).

Some parts of SW Bakersfield are okay, and some people think Bakersfield is close enough to L.A., but I don't. In the southern parts of the SJ Valley, you're also dealing with the poor air quality there, and non stressful access (avoiding the passes in inclement weather) to Vegas and L.A. isn't year round.

Two things I didn't bring up in the other post (to avoid getting too much into the weeds, and I haven't saved the data together) are that I've noticed over the years that it's easier to find lower cost properties in Texas that fit a low crime profile, and are zoned for good schools than it is in California.

I have some friends who live in the Anderson Mill neighborhood in Austin, which is zoned to some of the best public schools in Texas. Yes, the most expensive properties there can be over $1 million (large houses on 1+ acre lots), but you can also buy a small condo there for $135k that is zoned to the same schools, and has the same parks nearby. Right now the drive from where my friends live to Houston isn't bad, but there is so much development going on on Hwy 290 between Austin and Houston that I think...eventually...that trip might be as big of a PITA as driving from Fresno to SF is.
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Brendansport, Sagitta IV
8,087 posts, read 15,159,512 times
Reputation: 3740
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Interesting except that I'm not sure why you would compare Phoenix to Los Angeles?
It was the first biggest-city here-and-there comparison I came to. As noted you can have hours of fun on that site, comparing every hither and yon your heart desires, which may or may not be relevant depending on your needs and goals.
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:25 AM
 
33,321 posts, read 12,511,334 times
Reputation: 14937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
California has a higher cost of living than Bangladesh.

Know why?


Personally, I think it’s great that conservatives can find “better” places to live than California.

I only hope liberals can too.

Everyone go on ahead without me.

I’ll stay behind and sweep up.

I'm glad that I made it my business to explore pretty much every area of California (all over) that I've wanted to...before it became as much of a PITA as it as now (re so many more people) .
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:31 AM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,797,242 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tulemutt View Post
So what? You keep saying this .... over and over and over ... The fact is: the population is growing. Not just by births (which are down). People. From wherever. Keep. Coming. In spite of the COL. Period.

Oh and, no, the growth from immigration is not by illegals. Illegal immigration numbers are in decline.
Not true, read some of the earlier posts that have that info. There is a large Net Loss every year. And it is understandable (once again, as I've said before there are plenty of people that enjoy a progressive political climate and who have tech jobs that pay well enough to afford them the luxury....
That's fine and as it should be.......
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,845 posts, read 26,259,081 times
Reputation: 34056
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reziac View Post
It was the first biggest-city here-and-there comparison I came to. As noted you can have hours of fun on that site, comparing every hither and yon your heart desires, which may or may not be relevant depending on your needs and goals.
I understand that, but they aren't really very similar, not even in size. The GDP per capita for Los Angeles metro in 2017 was $67,763; for Phoenix metro for the same year - $44,534
 
Old 09-16-2019, 08:49 AM
 
4,021 posts, read 1,797,242 times
Reputation: 4862
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
I get that, I understand what you wrote:
But offhand the only thing that I know of that is substantially cheaper in Arizona is dairy products. And to the best of my knowledge a pair of levi's, or pretty much any other clothing item costs the same no matter where you buy it so I just can't fathom how you could save that much money. Restaurants are probably cheaper in AZ because of the difference in the minimum wage. I can't make your math work, but sincerely for your sake I hope you're right
Thank you, I appreciate your good thoughts...
I've found a few calculators that measure everything from toothpaste to coffee to bullets....and it all seems to be about 20% less on average. Plus I have a couple sets of friends who have provided input that says the same thing. But you're right, it's way to difficult to know how much less the COL will be until you actually do it. So we will see :-)

But regardless, even if the COL was identical, the move is inevitable. Being able to pull so much $$ out of our current house, plus the bonus of living in a 'Free-er' state is too much of a no-brainer.....
 
Old 09-16-2019, 09:25 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,721 posts, read 26,798,919 times
Reputation: 24785
Quote:
Originally Posted by RMESMH View Post
You've got a decent point with San Berdoo, re cost and location. It's not that far from L.A. amenities, and the route is fairy flat, albeit congested. But I've never looked at the crime nor school stats there.
Not great, although it appears to be improving. http://www.city-data.com/forum/san-b...ble-place.html
 
Old 09-16-2019, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Formerly Pleasanton Ca, now in Marietta Ga
10,347 posts, read 8,564,711 times
Reputation: 16689
Just to add a few tidbits about costs.

The cost to register one of my cars in California is over $700 per year. So over 5 years that's about $3500. In the Atlanta Area it's $20 per year so over 5 years it $100. So it's $3400 less.
My other car in California is over $250 per year. So over 5 years that's about $1250. In the Atlanta Area it's $20 per year again so over 5 years it $100. So it's $1150 less.

So over $4500 less in registration fees.

Smog checks are about $45 in Pleasanton Ca, $15 here in Georgia.

Based on my driving of 20K miles a year, gas here is about $1.22 less than California at respective Costco's so that is about $1627 less per year in Georgia.
So in my case over 5 years it's over $6,0000 less in Georgia.
As far as insurance I think it's about the same, no savings.

I checked on a house I used to own in the houston metro area that was worth about $215K today. Taxes were very high at about $5900 a year (one of the highest rates in Texas) Schools are highly rated.

Another friend of mine has a similar house about 10% bigger in my old home town of Pleasanton, Ca. Thanks to Prop 13 he bought in 2003 for $600K he pays about $8k a year in taxes, still higher than Texas. But his value is 1.3 million today so the new buyer will pay closer to $16K a year in taxes.

I don't do a lot of grocery shopping, but I don't see much difference in costs there. Eating out Ca might be about 10 to 15% higher in the type of place I frequent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top