Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-12-2012, 06:32 AM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,653,986 times
Reputation: 7571

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by frewroad View Post
The last poll taken in NC (by Gravis Marketing) shows Romney ahead by 9 pts.
Gravis Marketing wants you to believe that this is Doug Kaplan

Meet Doug Kaplan

http://dougkaplan.net/...


Check out the three 'officers' of the company and nothing comes up. No academic, professional or occupational hits.
They are
Doug Kaplan
Chad Miller
Bobby Hymel.
They have between 2 to 4 employees.


Doug Kaplan's resume/experience:
http://dougkaplan.net/...

 
Old 10-12-2012, 06:34 AM
 
Location: Greer
2,213 posts, read 2,845,153 times
Reputation: 1737
Quote:
Originally Posted by frewroad View Post
The last poll taken in NC (by Gravis Marketing) shows Romney ahead by 9 pts.
The Gravis Marketing poll is an outlier from the vast majority of other mainstream polls.

North Carolina Presidential Polls 2012
 
Old 10-12-2012, 06:52 AM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,653,986 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvsteve View Post
The Gravis Marketing poll is an outlier from the vast majority of other mainstream polls.

North Carolina Presidential Polls 2012
Gravis is a fraud... they don't call, they don't conduct diddly squat... they are a sham.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 07:21 AM
 
495 posts, read 1,078,216 times
Reputation: 807
The only poll that matters is the one on election day. Any trash talk from either side before then is useless and immature. Let's just be adults, vote for the candidate whom each of us prefers individually, and respect the free will of one another to make that decision for themselves without turning this into silly play-by-play gamesmanship.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 07:46 AM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,975,478 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueheronNC View Post
... Any trash talk from either side......
What side would that be?
 
Old 10-12-2012, 11:39 AM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,975,478 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
Gravis is a fraud... they don't call, they don't conduct diddly squat... they are a sham.
This isn't correct. The poll I cited was conducted on Oct 6-8. Anyone can read the results at this link.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/doc...is_NC_1008.pdf


I think the most interesting statistic from that poll is that Romney polls over 50% of independent voters whereas only 27% of these voters care for Obama. That is really a dunning statistic for Obama.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 12:33 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,653,986 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by frewroad View Post
This isn't correct. The poll I cited was conducted on Oct 6-8. Anyone can read the results at this link.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/doc...is_NC_1008.pdf


I think the most interesting statistic from that poll is that Romney polls over 50% of independent voters whereas only 27% of these voters care for Obama. That is really a dunning statistic for Obama.
Gravis is a joke... period.

Rasmussen on Oct 2nd... Romney +4 (margin of error 4.5)
Gravis Oct 6-8th.. Romney +9 (margin of error 2.9)
Rasmussen on Oct 9th... Romney +3 (margin of error 4.5)

Why the hell would you use Gravis when it's skewed that far? LOL...

Also remember in 2008: Obama, however, did not take the traditional Democratic path to victory. Instead, his main margins came from the cities, where he did particularly well throughout the country. While Obama only won 35 of North Carolina's 100 counties, these counties contained more than half of the state's population.

I wouldn't put any stock in a poll when 75% of the participants are white. Obama is depending on urban areas to win NC. It all depends on how "excited" these areas are... if they don't turn out it's a wrap, if they vote it will be razor thin regardless of the winner

Last edited by Feltdesigner; 10-12-2012 at 12:42 PM..
 
Old 10-12-2012, 12:53 PM
 
2,775 posts, read 5,166,000 times
Reputation: 3673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
...
[/i]I wouldn't put any stock in a poll when 75% of the participants are white. Obama is depending on urban areas to win NC. It all depends on how "excited" these areas are... if they don't turn out it's a wrap, if they vote it will be razor thin regardless of the winner
I don't get your logic...in your opinion what should be the correct poll participants representation in percentage?

North Carolina QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
 
Old 10-12-2012, 12:58 PM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,975,478 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
I wouldn't put any stock in a poll when 75% of the participants are white. Obama is depending on urban areas to win NC. It all depends on how "excited" these areas are... if they don't turn out it's a wrap, if they vote it will be razor thin regardless of the winner
Hmm I don't see where they are a joke. I do see where it's being stated that if a polling organization predicts that a certain candidate pulls ahead, then said polling organizaiton is discredited. 2nd pollester where this has happened now.

Obama won because he got 18,000 more votes than McCain/Palin (a horrible ticket) in a state with over 6 million voters. The urban areas, while holding the 1/2 of the urban population, do not result in 1/2 of the net votes because they tend to cancel themselves out. In Mecklenburg, while over 400,000 people voted, Obama only netted 100,000 votes from Mecklenburg, the most populous county in the state. However these votes were canceled out by the net votes from Iredell, Gaston, Cabarrus, Union and Lincoln counties, 5 of the 6 counties in the Charlotte metro. If I had added in York county in SC, this metro netted votes for McCain, one of the worst tickets in memory. So the idea that urban areas make this election isn't true.

I tend to believe what the math says.
 
Old 10-12-2012, 01:28 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,653,986 times
Reputation: 7571
Quote:
Originally Posted by 28173 View Post
I don't get your logic...in your opinion what should be the correct poll participants representation in percentage?

North Carolina QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
Probably closer to 65% white... hard to say but when the poll is 6 points above every other poll you have to wonder how accurate it is.

...or maybe all the over polls are wrong. LOL..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top