Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What size does it feel like
Second largest 143 63.56%
Third largerst 58 25.78%
Fourth largest 24 10.67%
Voters: 225. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2012, 11:31 PM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,127,062 times
Reputation: 4931

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by edsg25 View Post
Tex, I'm not disagreeing with you here because I'm not sure exactly the point you are making (no offense to you on that....it might just be that I'm not reading it the right way).

can you clarify? what (based on what I previously wrote) do you see as the downside for Chicago in relationship to both NY and LA.
Not a downside. Rather saying how it contributes to a lot of misunderstanding and misconceptions, etc about Chicago and Chicagoland. When you lump Garfield Ridge in with the Gold Coast as part of the same "place" or even Joliet or Libertyville as part of Chicagoland.

In NYC as you said, the places are much more compartmentalized and categorized and there is no confusion about NYC, because every knows the difference between Staten Island and Manhattan.

And everyone knows the difference between the West side of LA and the Valley.

Its broken down into manageable parts to understand the parts of the metro area.

Smaller metro areas you don't have to do that, because there small. Same thing with big metro areas that are all suburban (IE: Texas metro areas). Its the same lifestyle everywhere.

Chicagoland is big enough where maybe it is helpful to break it down the way NYC and LA is broken down, but we don't have mountains and big rivers separating it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2012, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,706,247 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by aragx6 View Post
Really? Where have you gone?
So far the loop and the northern suburbs. It's not like Chicago doesn't have a lot, I just don't see how it compares to Los Angeles besides the loop. I think is really close between the two considering that chicago is quite a bit smaller though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 08:03 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
So far the loop and the northern suburbs. It's not like Chicago doesn't have a lot, I just don't see how it compares to Los Angeles besides the loop. I think is really close between the two considering that chicago is quite a bit smaller though.
So you've seen a small part of the area. I'm not sure you can get an appreciation for the scale of the Chicago area until you drive from Michigan City to Joliet to Elgin to Kenosha. Our suburbs are less dense but the urbanized area covers a lot of ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 09:55 AM
 
5,985 posts, read 13,127,062 times
Reputation: 4931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
So you've seen a small part of the area. I'm not sure you can get an appreciation for the scale of the Chicago area until you drive from Michigan City to Joliet to Elgin to Kenosha. Our suburbs are less dense but the urbanized area covers a lot of ground.
Thing is though in the outer stretches of Chicagoland, as is the case with most large metro areas where you don't have natural barriers like mountains, federal lands, and plenty of water (whether ground or surface), you have all kinds of "leapfrogging" so not only are the suburbs less dense, they do have straight rural land within the metro.

Michigan City for example is really stretching it, and I'm not sure if its considered part of the metro area. The part of I-94 does contain a lot farms and woods between Portage, IN and Michigan City.

Same with Kenosha. I would say even most of the Lake County suburbs are more exurban with a few horse farms still around. And really north of Gurnee Mills/Six Flags, is actually fairly rural looking with the exception of the major outlet malls right off the exits.

Joliet and Elgin are more built up between these cities and closer suburbs, but even there, there is existing farmland, wetlands, and woods scattered between these sattelite cities and middle ring suburbs. ALong I-90 in the wesetern fringe of Hoffman Estates, there are definitely pockets of areas that are country-like. A lot of it forest preserve, but some of it is still non-park.

Same thing in a few stretches of along I-55 between Bolingbrook and Joliet. Even more so, if you go along the old the river. You obviously have the huge forest preserve complexes of the Palos region, but Lemont between Chicago and Joliet, truly looks like a small midwestern river town, with some fancy subdivisions built around it. (which of course it pretty much is).

Yet all of this is considered part of Chicagoland. In other parts of the country, such exurbs/satellite cities don't usually get associated with the nearby large city. And in other states, where there are multiple large cities like Texas (or California) such exurbs/satellite cities just get described as the state, when people from there are asked where there are from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2012, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Tower Grove East, St. Louis, MO
12,063 posts, read 31,628,883 times
Reputation: 3799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
So far the loop and the northern suburbs. It's not like Chicago doesn't have a lot, I just don't see how it compares to Los Angeles besides the loop. I think is really close between the two considering that chicago is quite a bit smaller though.
Good grief, get out of the loop! For your own sake, sure, but particularly before making any more statements about Chicago! People work in the loop; very few live there. To love Chciago you need to explore the neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 08:53 AM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,706,247 times
Reputation: 5872
What is there to do in the suburbs though? Does anyone know if the six flags is open?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,201,566 times
Reputation: 2637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
So far the loop and the northern suburbs. It's not like Chicago doesn't have a lot, I just don't see how it compares to Los Angeles besides the loop. I think is really close between the two considering that chicago is quite a bit smaller though.
Wtf.
No south, south west, north west,south east, far west, etc?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 11:25 AM
 
Location: Tower Grove East, St. Louis, MO
12,063 posts, read 31,628,883 times
Reputation: 3799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
What is there to do in the suburbs though? Does anyone know if the six flags is open?
Not talking about the suburbs, but for the record, no I don't think Six Flags isn't open yet -- I'd guess April though. I pulled up their Web site but apparently it's filtered at my work as "Entertainment" so I can't access it. Pretty asinine given that I can spend half my day posting here but I won't complain

I mean neighborhoods like Lakeview, Wicker Park, Andersonville, Lincoln Park, Lincoln Square -- I would start by just hopping on the brown line and doing some discovering!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,569 posts, read 7,201,566 times
Reputation: 2637
Pilsen, Little village, Humboldt Park, Oak Park, Forest PArk, the malls in the suburbs, China town, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2012, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Not where you ever lived
11,535 posts, read 30,269,957 times
Reputation: 6426
Cook County is approaching 1000 square miles in size. It sprawls. The city is more compact. I kid and say the City of Chicago has 1000 tiny little neighborhoods where your find the secrets that make Chicago a great city. Truthfully there is probably three times more neighborhoods than that and none of them are in the loop.

I don't know anyone with tunnel vision that ever enjoyed Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Illinois > Chicago

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top