Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2014, 04:43 PM
 
4,792 posts, read 6,049,648 times
Reputation: 2724

Advertisements

Hello all. I have been doing some studying and wondering if someone could help me.

It seems that female homosexuality is not dealt with in the Bible, and that ancient scholars (in the Jewish tradition) did not regard it as a problem.

Here are some interesting links:

Lesbianism

http://www.gaychristian101.com/are-l...the-bible.html

With knowing that polygamy was common as were concubines and harems, isn't it safe to assume that *some* girl-on-girl action happened? Why did God not deal with this in the Mosaic Law and only mentions it in passing in the New Testament?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2014, 06:48 PM
 
Location: california
7,322 posts, read 6,919,546 times
Reputation: 9253
Romans 1;26 is about as close as it comes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 06:57 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,916,433 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by arleigh View Post
Romans 1;26 is about as close as it comes.
That's pretty obtuse, one could say.

Apparently it just wasn't a big deal to the OT writers, and Paul didn't like women anyways, so he really didn't think of it either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 07:40 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,384,702 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
That's pretty obtuse, one could say.

Apparently it just wasn't a big deal to the OT writers, and Paul didn't like women anyways, so he really didn't think of it either.
Ontuse?


KJV Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Seems pretty straight forward. Reading in context helps.

Paul did not dislike like women as is evident if one actually pays attention to what he said and did.

One of the few recorded miracles he did was to raise a woman from the dead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 07:40 PM
 
9,908 posts, read 9,579,736 times
Reputation: 10108
yeah I'd say moral laws and responsbilities for a man it would be the same for a woman, because morals are not gender specific and whether you are a man or a woman, God holds us to standards, i.e. you cant say "oh im a woman so im exempt".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2014, 11:13 PM
 
Location: Someplace Wonderful
5,177 posts, read 4,788,644 times
Reputation: 2587
Not in the Bible because it did not exist until Satan used his influence to create it in the 1970's!

BTW this is what is known as satire ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 03:55 AM
 
9,689 posts, read 10,008,103 times
Reputation: 1927
Still lust is sin as it will attract demons , which need to be deliver by Christ to be in the presence of God , so if sexually diverse relationship come with lust then sin will be there , and adultery sin is there so will the demon spirit taking authority to help people sin more ....... See this is the spiritual issues which God has , as God does not induce people to sin , He will only keep people in sin when they want sin , which is the justice of God
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 04:20 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,377,437 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by arleigh View Post
Romans 1;26 is about as close as it comes.
Not very close at all then.

Paul was referring to people who turned away from his god and were using idolatrous ritual sex acts used to worship pagan fertility gods in Corinthian pagan temples. The letter was supposedly written from Corinth where there were many pagan temples and temple prostitutes in the first century.

The men and women (temple prostitutes) were first having heterosexual sex with each other. It says that a few verses before. That this takes place in pagan temples is also made obvious a few verses earlier. They then "exchanged" vaginal sex for anal sex. Women had anal sex with the men and in the same way, men had anal sex with men.

St Augustine, wrote of men having anal sex with their wives and cited Romans 1:26. Most people seem to just insert the idea that the women were having sex with each other, but the original Greek doesn't say that.

Augustine (354–430 C.E.):

"But if one has relations even with one’s wife in a part of the body which was not made for begetting children, such relations are against nature and indecent. In fact, the same apostle earlier said the same thing about the women, For their women exchanged natural relations for those which are against nature (Rom 1:26)".

Augustine, Marriage and Desire 20.35 (trans. Roland Teske; ed. John E Rotelle; Answer to the Pelagians, II; New York: New City Press, 1990), 75-76.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 04:32 AM
 
5,187 posts, read 6,937,844 times
Reputation: 1648
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
That's pretty obtuse, one could say.

Apparently it just wasn't a big deal to the OT writers, and Paul didn't like women anyways, so he really didn't think of it either.

Where does it say in the bible that Paul did not like women ? Talk about obtuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2014, 07:16 AM
 
9,908 posts, read 9,579,736 times
Reputation: 10108
Quote:
Originally Posted by perry335654 View Post
Where does it say in the bible that Paul did not like women ? Talk about obtuse.
Really!

All that Paul went thru, and the fact that Jesus Himself called him on the road to Damascus, and thru him, penned much of the New Testament,,,, and then to read a comment such as that.. sheesh!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top