Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: US Metro with the worst traffic (excluding L.A.)?
Chicago 35 12.73%
Dallas-Ft.Worth 8 2.91%
Philadelphia 6 2.18%
Houston 26 9.45%
Miami 6 2.18%
Washington D.C. 84 30.55%
Atlanta 49 17.82%
Detroit 1 0.36%
Boston 13 4.73%
San Francisco 15 5.45%
Phoenix 9 3.27%
Seattle 13 4.73%
Minneapolis-St.Paul 2 0.73%
San Diego 4 1.45%
Denver 4 1.45%
Voters: 275. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2008, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Bronx, NY
5,720 posts, read 20,049,253 times
Reputation: 2363

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
The GW Bridge and the Cross Bronx is vicious!
Even with LA, NYC traffic may be worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2008, 11:19 PM
 
Location: Tucson
686 posts, read 3,716,457 times
Reputation: 224
Almost any large city has real bad traffic. I know Atlanta has REAL bad traffic along with Seattle. Seattle and Atlanta almost always come out near the top for worst traffic. I think their both top 5.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 12:13 AM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,348,308 times
Reputation: 6225
This is according to Forbes. The top two worst freeways/interchanges are in LA. However, if you read the article, the slideshow of worst interchanges show the 101/405 interchange, but this article was written over a year ago and since then the interchange has been fixed and now runs quite smoothly I would say.

1. Los Angeles, Long Beach, Santa Ana, Calif.
2. San Francisco, Oakland, Calif.
3. Washington, D.C.
4. Atlanta
5. Houston
6. Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Tex.
7. Chicago.
8. Detroit
9. Riverside, San Bernardino, Calif.
9. Orlando, Fla.
11. San Jose, Calif.
12. San Diego



Article:Worst Cities For Traffic - Forbes.com




Not really sure how this article works because LA is not near the top.
Gridlock alert! 5 cities with the worst traffic - Christopher Elliott - MSNBC.com

America's Worst Traffic Traps - Forbes.com





So...anyone notice anything odd about which freeways are constantly packed. Not that most are in LA or anything, but I thought the 10 in LA was bad. I didn't know it was bad everywhere else too. It causes traffic problems in LA, Phoenix, Houston, and I'm sure others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 05:41 AM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,690,922 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel_T View Post
Almost any large city has real bad traffic. I know Atlanta has REAL bad traffic along with Seattle. Seattle and Atlanta almost always come out near the top for worst traffic. I think their both top 5.
i've been to seattle a lot and really don't find the traffic all that bad - it's way better than atlanta, houston and DC, IMHO. we were downtown once and headed back on 405 towards Everett, in the rain (duh) at 5pm on a Friday. We were warned "it's gonna take FOREVAH!". Took about 35 minutes. There are a lot of slowdowns, but I've never seen complete and utter gridlock like in the other places I've mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 10:18 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
The one saving grace for Chicago is that it built a good transit system. I hate traffic, so I just ditched my car about a year after I moved here. Cut down on the stress a LOT.

The traffic is horrible, but I can't even imagine what it would be without the trains and buses.

The Chicagoland area has 717 miles of passenger train service, and 374 train stations.

There are also 394 fixed bus routes in the area, and combined the services deliver well over 2,000,000 passenger trips on an average weekday. If you take it to work and back, that's around 1,000,000 people a day who use the bus or a train. Figure a lot of those people would have had to drive alone, you're probably talking 600,000 cars taken off the road each day...going to work AND coming back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 10:24 AM
 
Location: SW France
16,670 posts, read 17,435,450 times
Reputation: 29962
The trouble with Houston is that there are very few alternatives to the car.

I did live there two years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 11:46 AM
 
5,347 posts, read 10,161,008 times
Reputation: 2446
Imagaine if cities didn't have public transportation. The roads would be gridlocked 24 hours a day. That's why i have a hard time digesting the opposition to transit we have in the States by its citizens as well as the Feds and State Governments. PT doesn't solve traffic congestion by any means but what it does offer is an alternative to driving. BTW - Gas prices are predicted to go up to $4.00 this summer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 06:30 PM
 
Location: san diego, Los angeles
102 posts, read 472,543 times
Reputation: 65
san diego just minous well just become the next L.A. because its traffic is craxy with an X.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 07:33 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,348,308 times
Reputation: 6225
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
Imagaine if cities didn't have public transportation. The roads would be gridlocked 24 hours a day.
How does NYC fit this? Manhattan is just a parking lot on an island with tall buildings surrounding it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2008, 08:22 PM
 
Location: outer boroughs, NYC
904 posts, read 2,873,183 times
Reputation: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
How does NYC fit this? Manhattan is just a parking lot on an island with tall buildings surrounding it.
Much of the traffic on Manhattan itself is actually taxis and commercial traffic (trucks and vans used for small businesses). Plus, there's 20 million people in the NYC metro. Some of them are going to drive, either by choice or necessity.

Public transit does alleviate congestion somewhat, nevertheless, the latter is an unavoidable fact of life in any big city. I actually think public transit's greatest benefits lie in other areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top