Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-31-2010, 09:57 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762

Advertisements

Outside its tiny city limits, Miami is pretty densely populated as its urbanized area is sandwiched between the Everglades and the Atlantic. In fact, some of Miami's "burbs" are more densely populated than the city itself. For instance, Miami Beach is over 12,500 ppl/sq mile while the city of Miami is 12,100 ppl/sq mile.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-31-2010, 10:04 AM
eek
 
Location: Queens, NY
3,574 posts, read 7,734,977 times
Reputation: 1478
nyc metro, dmv area definitely.
i don't know the west coast as well but obviously that area has some good stuff without the main cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 10:08 AM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,653 posts, read 5,961,845 times
Reputation: 2331
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
LA is the biggest expanse of moderate to high development with continuity in the country - especially on land area covered

NE metros are very desne at the core - the radiate typically losing density and pockets around the old towns

LA is less dense in the core but radiates with almost sonsitent density/developemnt over a long way
Indeed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 10:09 AM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,350,211 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Inc. View Post
LA's suburbs look like exurbs stop kidding yourself.
A pretty terrible post right there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 11:06 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,946,212 times
Reputation: 3449
Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex


Here's my list

Arlington-380,084
Plano-273,611
Irving-205,540
Carrollton-129,209
Richardson-101,400
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 11:35 AM
 
Location: The Greatest city on Earth: City of Atlanta Proper
8,486 posts, read 14,999,411 times
Reputation: 7333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akhenaton06 View Post
Typically traditional town centers in the once independent suburbs that have since been swallowed up in the metro area's sprawl, which are pretty small relative to the primary city. In metro Atlanta, that includes suburbs like Decatur and Marietta.
Yeah, it's funny how people on these boards never think of how small the city of Atlanta itself is. They look at a map and think of everything in side of I-285 is just the city of Atlanta. In reality, there are nine incorporated cities:

Atlanta proper
East Point
College Park
Hapeville
Decatur
Chamblee
Doraville
Avondale Estates
Half of Sandy Springs
Half of Dunwoody

And 13 CDPs:

Brookhaven
North Atlanta
North Decatur
South Decatur
Druid Hills
Panthersville
Gresham Park
Candle-Mcafee
Redan
Scottsdale
Tucker
Belvedere Park
Vinings

All of that is before you get OTP and hit the sprawl everyone always goes on about in the suburban counties.

As you pointed out though, there are several other cities outside I-285 that have been around before the Metro hit it's big population gains like Marietta or Norcross.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 01:01 PM
 
Location: a swanky suburb in my fancy pants
3,391 posts, read 8,780,794 times
Reputation: 1624
By subtracting city population from MSA population (2009) I get these figures for each city's suburbs outside the city limits (Ft Worth is included with Dallas suburbs).

NYC 10,677,119
LA 9,042,132
Chi 6,728,732
Dallas 5,147,458
Miami 5,113,864
Atlanta 4,934,078
DC 4,876,343
Phila 4,421,000
Boston 3,942,831
Houston 3,609,074
SF 3,501,642
Detroit 3,492,079
Phoenix 2,770,400
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 02:16 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,190,713 times
Reputation: 4407
Population does not mean urban...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 03:01 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
2,079 posts, read 6,115,292 times
Reputation: 934
I would say Atlanta is not in the top 5. The metro seems very large from the highways, even in the suburbs, because there are tall office buildings everywhere, heavy traffic, and 20 lane highways. Once you step off the highway, though, Atlanta is very low density single family and medium density multifamily with huge buffers. Even within the perimeter there are spots that look almost country.

Atlanta certainly builds "up" in office space, but fails to plan residential very well or build up at all. Atlanta's residential is some of the lowest density residential I have ever seen (Charlotte, Raleigh, Birmingham, and Nashville too).

I would guess that Houston seems more urban overall. Houston certainly sprawls, but I have studies spatial relations between Houston and Atlanta, and Atlanta covers twice the area with the same amount of people (relatively). Houston has 2 "perimeters", but even the further out one is hardly further out than Atlanta's Perimeter. There is a decent grid patter and yards don't have an acre on average with a buffer between every development.

The following two graphics might be interesting to note.

http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad1/jsimms3/Atlanta%20Sprawl%20Examples/Atlanta-metroclean.jpg (broken link)

http://i916.photobucket.com/albums/ad1/jsimms3/Atlanta%20Sprawl%20Examples/Slide1.jpg (broken link)



The above slides prepared by Douglas Allen, Senior Associate Dean, College of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology. All credits go to him for research and preparation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-31-2010, 03:09 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,904,705 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryson662001 View Post
By subtracting city population from MSA population (2009) I get these figures for each city's suburbs outside the city limits (Ft Worth is included with Dallas suburbs).
Why am I not surprised....?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top