Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Depends which type of minorities. The west coast might be more accepting of Hispanics, east coast for Blacks, and west coast for Asians.
Anyone who says blacks are treated better on the East are instantly discredited in my eyes and are just probably looking at the lower-income, swagged-up, thugged-out, stereotypical blacks. The East Coast is definitely better for those groups, but blacks who refuse to play the "black script" are ridiculed out in the East Coast and are better off out West. Hell, the South would be better for non-stereotypical blacks than the East Coast.
Anyone who says blacks are treated better on the East are instantly discredited in my eyes and are just probably looking at the lower-income, swagged-up, thugged-out, stereotypical blacks. The East Coast is definitely better for those groups, but blacks who refuse to play the "black script" are ridiculed out in the East Coast and are better off out West. Hell, the South would be better for non-stereotypical blacks than the East Coast.
Are you implying that the only type of black folks that can fit in on the East Coast are stereotypical black thugs? You're telling me that all the successful black people in Maryland, NY, D.C., and the southeastern states need to be black thugs?
Because he's referring to just the black murder rate. Blacks are a small % of the population but a large % of the murders ins San Francisco, so the black murder rate in San Francisco is much higher than the overall rate. Detroit is mostly black, so its black murder rate is roughly the same as its overall murder rate. Detroit's murder rate was 48 per 100k in 2011. Looked up numbers and made this list a while back
Grat information nei! A black man in Oakland is almost twice as likely to be murdered as a black man in Chicago. Although both rates are terrible, we see how Oakland is taken to a whole other level of violence within the black community. It would be amazing if you could get the statistics for other California cities such as SF, Long Beach, Richmond, Compton, etc.
Here is an article from 2006 which states that the murder rate among African Americans is twice as high as the murder rate among African Americans in Oakland.
So by your numbers, we could assume that the murder rate among blacks in SF could consistently be around 100 per 100,000 people. I wouldn't be surprised if the numbers for Richmond, Compton and other California cities showed sky high murder rates among blacks either.
Are you implying that the only type of black folks that can fit in on the East Coast are stereotypical black thugs? You're telling me that all the successful black people in Maryland, NY, D.C., and the southeastern states need to be black thugs?
West for asians and hispanics and the south for blacks. Black people are not fleeing every other region of the country in droves for the south for no reason.
Ask a black transplant living in Atlanta from LA Denver or Chicago which place is more racist, segregated or hostile towards black people and the answer will almost never be Atlanta, same thing for nashville, charlotte, raleigh, houston, or even memphis.
Its 2013 folks.
West for asians and hispanics and the south for blacks. Black people are not fleeing every other region of the country in droves for the south for no reason.
Ask a black transplant living in Atlanta from LA Denver or Chicago which place is more racist, segregated or hostile towards black people and the answer will almost never be Atlanta, same thing for nashville, charlotte, raleigh, houston, or even memphis.
Its 2013 folks.
Seems like the west isn't real much of a place to be unlike the south or possibly northeast.
I don't need to have lived on the West Coast to come up with that opinion. You really think most White liberals want to live around minorities? Again, Manhattan is DEFINITELY liberal leaning, but look at how kids don't attend NYPS schools.
Exactly.
Anyways, thought this would be interesting to add:
Total number of international immigrants by MSA (except for BWI and SF/SJ which will be CSA). I will least all that had over 10,000 immigrants during 2011. The total number for the US was 1,062,040:
Total immigration from Asia during 2011 by MSA/CSA. Includes all of East and Southeast Asia as well as the Indian Subcontinent. All over 5k in 2011 are listed:
Total Immigration from North America during 2011 by MSA/CSA. This includes Mexico, Central America, The Caribbean, and Canada. All over 2,000 are listed:
From EVERY single part of the world, a Northeastern City is #1 in number of immigrants received. I'm sure they know where they would feel the most accepted
True Facts history, new york Well east coast period created the Ethnicity multicultural progress .
Some what true, but the real factor is Cultural History
Blacks came from the East Coast since the colonial era
13 Colonies which were free blacks which alot was establishing and some were poor latter days The other region was the South, Virginia too East Texas.
Interestingly, around 1 in 5 marriages between thirty-somethings is interracial. Looks like interracial couples are more common along the Pacific coast, and the "sunbelt states" more broadly. They are least common in the Deep South and the Southern Midwest.
The east coast isn't mentioned in this study.
Nor did I dig up any analysis of the other criteria mentioned in the original post, this was my quick 5 minute web search results...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.