Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Seattle vs Boston vs Los Angeles vs the Bay Area
Seattle 28 19.05%
Boston 35 23.81%
Los Angeles 50 34.01%
the Bay Area 34 23.13%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2018, 01:17 AM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,924,430 times
Reputation: 4942

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NW4me View Post
If it's racial diversity you want, I think you'd find that LA and the Bay area have more of it than Boston, and certainly have more than Seattle (which, I think, is at least 75% white).
if we go by the 2010 census (which is a bit outdated)

San Francisco
White: 48.5% (Non-Hispanic white: 41.9%)
Asian: 33.3%
Black: 6.1%
Hispanic: 15.1%
Two or more: 4.7%
Other: 6.6%
Native: 0.5%
Pacific Islander: 0.4%

Los Angeles
White: 49.8% (Non-Hispanic white: 28.7%)
Asian: 11.3%
Black: 9.6%
Hispanic: 48.5%
Two or more: 4.6%
Other: 23.8%
Native: 0.7%
Pacific Islander: 0.1%

Boston (2015)
White: 62.1% (Non-Hispanic white: 46.2%)
Asian: 9.1%
Black: 24.7%
Hispanic: 22.1%
Two or more: 3.1%
Native: 0.8%


Seattle
White: 69.5% (Non-Hispanic white: 66.3%)
Asian: 13.8%
Black: 7.9%
Hispanic: 6.6%
Two or more: 5.1%
Other: 2.4%
Native: 0.8%
Pacific Islander: 0.4%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-01-2018, 04:09 PM
 
23,688 posts, read 9,375,514 times
Reputation: 8652
I voted L.A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2018, 12:58 AM
 
Location: Norteh Bajo Americano
1,631 posts, read 2,386,044 times
Reputation: 2116
How come the person who wrote the question never had a single response back? What did that person choose? Its been since 2013.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2018, 10:46 PM
 
23 posts, read 21,641 times
Reputation: 31
The obvious answer is the Bay area, but don't take my word for it, as someone from the San Francisco forum wrote so eloquently:

The Bay Area from Santa Clara (City, not County) to San Francisco is the "center of the world" in some respects, it's more than just a place to live. Any place you move to will not compare, if you sell you will never be able to move back, always looking back at the life you could have had in paradise. For some there is more to life than the size of your house, or how much land you own. Life is about community, education, prosperity, technology. And the Bay Area has it the best. You don't need to come onto this forum to try and justify your decision to move away, you made the choice now live with it, and don't forget the lunch special at Arbys.

As for my kids and grandkids, don't presume to know their future because you don't. They can accomplish anything they put their minds to. If an adopted Bay Area kid can invent the future of computing, get fired, come back and invent the future of telephones, becoming a multi-billionaire in the process, then anything is possible.. in the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-03-2018, 09:45 PM
 
1,122 posts, read 924,595 times
Reputation: 660
Boston's $80B construction market at a glance.

This list underlines the rapid mobilization of capital and dramatic growth underway within the Boston Metro core.

http://www.archboston.org/community/...?t=3920&page=7

the idea that Boston is just a few square miles of density is ludicrous.

i'd estimate at least 30 sq mi of continuous dense highrise, mid-rise, rowhouse, Lab & office development in the Metro across Boston, Cambridge, Somerville and Chelsea.... and big TOD expensions are underway in Everett & Malden holding up the rear. The numbers increase over the next 4~5 years... also; not all 3 decker neighborhoods are created equal.... along our heavy rail transit lines; dense "triple" clusters are the norm over extensive areas of the metro; especially north of the Charles.... Huge housing projects are ramping up in Roxbury, Dorchester, South Boston, East Boston, Allston and Brighton. >5,000 units are planned for Cambridge (alone) over the next 4-6 years.....

pop density;

Cambridge Total *(incl total coll students) 26,648/sq mile (111,654 residents + 60,000 students)

Somerville 18,868/ sq mi
Cambridge pop 17,160/ sq mi (111,654 + 450 grad student residents)
Chelsea 16,036.8/ sq mi
Boston 14,149/ sq mi (July 2017 updated)

at a glance; looking out over Chelsea....

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ch...!4d-71.0328284

When you add Cambridge, Somerville, + Chelsea to Boston,

you are ostensibly equal to San Francisco in size, population, pop density and total office sq ft.


Where ALL the venture capital in the US is concentrated:

6a355c034 by site builder, on Flickr


Boston's Biotech lab/office districts:
1. Seaport
2. East Cambridge
3. Allston Train Yards
4. Suffolk Downs
5. massive Dot Ave expansion (South Boston/Dorchester)
6. Somerville's massive Union Square expansion (planned)
7. Rt 128/495 Belt



https://www.bostonglobe.com/business...VlI/story.html

Boston will be the hub of the biotech universe starting Monday

excerpted:

By Jonathan Saltzman GLOBE STAFF JUNE 01, 2018

When more than 16,000 people from 74 countries descend on Boston for the annual Biotechnology Innovation Organization convention that starts Monday, they will find a Massachusetts biotech scene that’s more robust than the one in 2012 when the city last hosted the event. And, yes, the state relishes its renown as the life sciences hub of the universe.

The Massachusetts cluster employs thousands more people than it did six years ago and occupies millions more square feet of laboratory space. Since 2012, there have been over 60 new publicly traded local firms, as well as more divisions of multinational drug-maker giants. The biotech sector has launched novel medicines for diseases once thought hopeless, including a drug for spinal muscular atrophy, the leading genetic cause of death in infants.

“We’ve seen advances in science that are beyond all expectations, as it relates to therapies that can change the course of disease and, in some cases, cure disease,” said Robert Coughlin, president and chief executive of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council trade group, whose 16-year-old son, Bobby, has a rare condition, cystic fibrosis....

....Today, the sector is indeed booming, growing at roughly double the rate of the US and state economy over the past four years.

For the first time, the number of employees in the life sciences in the state has crossed 70,000, according to a recent report by the Massachusetts Biotechnology Education Foundation.

Half of those jobs — 34,366, to be exact — were in research and development in 2016, more than any state and slightly ahead of California, which ranks second, according to MassBio.

Investment has also soared. Biopharma attracted $2.9 billion in venture capital in 2016, more than triple the $900 million it received in 2012, says MassBio.

“It’s been a spectacular six years,” said Alexis Borisy, a partner in Third Rock Ventures, a Boston venture capital firm that began operating in 2007.

Consider this: Third Rock had yet to take a biotech public when BIO last convened in Boston. Since then, Borisy’s firm has taken 16 companies public, including Bluebird Bio, which is working on gene therapy to treat rare diseases, and Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc., which focuses on medicines to stimulate the body’s immune response against cancer cells.

Less than a year ago, Agios won approval of its first medicine, Idhifa. It is the first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute myeloid leukemia in adults with a particular genetic mutation who suffer relapses despite other treatments.

“That’s the most important metric of success,” Borisy of the drug’s approval. “The whole point of biotech is to take innovation in science and medicine and to bring it to patients.’’

Signs of the white-hot life sciences industry are impossible to miss when you walk around Cambridge’s Kendall Square, ground zero for the Massachusetts cluster.

Once the site of old industrial buildings, the neighborhood features gleaming new office buildings, such as one on Binney Street that will soon house Bristol-Myers Squibb’s new research and development site and several smaller biotechs.

Like several other pharmaceutical giants, Bristol-Myers Squibb decided to put its research scientists in what a spokeswoman called “the heart of a vibrant ecosystem of world-class science, innovation, and business opportunities.” It will house about 300 employees, some from elsewhere in the state, and others from outside Massachusetts, or new hires.

Cranes in the sky nearby attest to other commercial and residential constructions projects underway that cater to people in the drug-making industry.

LabCentral, a coworking biotechnology space that opened on Main Street in Kendall Square in late 2013, has repeatedly expanded and now houses 55 startup companies in about 105,000 square feet across its two-building campus. LabCentral is among about two dozen incubators that have opened throughout the state.

Today, Big Pharma companies domestic and foreign consider it almost imperative to have a presence in Massachusetts, and often in Cambridge. Among the giant companies that have increased their presence in the state in recent years — either by moving or expanding divisions here or by buying Massachusetts-based biotechs — are Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., Novartis AG, Sanofi SA, and Amgen Inc.

Just last month, Japanese drugmaker Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc. finalized a $62 billion agreement to buy Shire PLC, which has its headquarters in Ireland but is the second-biggest biotech employer in Massachusetts. Shire, which has most of its operations in Lexington, makes the ADHD drug Adderall and focuses on developing medicines for rare diseases.

Drug companies are changing the landscape of Boston, as well. One of the most prominent features of Boston’s Innovation District on the South Boston Waterfront is the relatively new headquarters of Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. The drugmaker moved its headquarters from Cambridge to a 1.1 million-square-foot complex there in 2014.

Given the catalyzing effect biopharma has had in Massachusetts, it’s no wonder that a slew of cities, states, and countries are sending contingents to BIO to encourage drugmakers to set up shop there.

Last edited by odurandina; 06-03-2018 at 11:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2018, 02:59 PM
 
Location: 415->916->602
3,145 posts, read 2,658,019 times
Reputation: 3872
Bay area, all day, everyday!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2018, 10:22 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,008,931 times
Reputation: 3284
LA metro blows these small metros out of the water. Bay Area? Yea if you want to pay 600k for a house in the slums of the east bay.

Boston? Get real.

Seattle? Nice metro, but no. Just no. Jeff baldy Bezos runs that town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2018, 11:34 PM
 
8,858 posts, read 6,856,075 times
Reputation: 8661
Not Bill Gates and Microsoft or the Gates Foundation? Or how about Boeing, which still employs more than either?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-08-2018, 07:56 AM
 
5,016 posts, read 3,914,958 times
Reputation: 4528
Quote:
Originally Posted by WizardOfRadical View Post
LA metro blows these small metros out of the water. Bay Area? Yea if you want to pay 600k for a house in the slums of the east bay.

Boston? Get real.

Seattle? Nice metro, but no. Just no. Jeff baldy Bezos runs that town.
I'd go Boston over Los Angeles, and it's not close.

The other two have a legitimate argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2018, 11:42 AM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
398 posts, read 382,014 times
Reputation: 501
I was in LA and SF a year ago. Both cities are in shambles.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUIa...&index=23&t=0s
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top