Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Seattle vs Boston vs Los Angeles vs the Bay Area
Seattle 28 19.05%
Boston 35 23.81%
Los Angeles 50 34.01%
the Bay Area 34 23.13%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,808 posts, read 6,049,019 times
Reputation: 5257

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATUMRE75 View Post
LA
SF
Seattle




Boston


___________

On a side note, I feel like this is turning into a city vs city thread, which isn't good because this was originally a relocation thread. Then again, the OP seems to have left the building, so I guess anything goes....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2013, 05:57 PM
 
6,843 posts, read 10,970,037 times
Reputation: 8436
Los Angeles or Boston

(Minor gap)

Bay Area

(America's third largest gap)

Seattle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 09:28 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
2,985 posts, read 4,887,169 times
Reputation: 3419
Bay Area

(Minor gap)

Seattle or Boston

(Minor gap)

Los Angeles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 09:40 PM
 
233 posts, read 369,037 times
Reputation: 240
[quote=munchitup;32401993]In its little core, yes Boston is more walkable. But that gives you about 40 square miles of walkable areas to deal with, while Los Angeles offers a plethora of walkable neighborhoods....


40sqmi...your words not mine...but I agree Boston does have many sqmi of urbanity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2013, 10:28 PM
 
1,637 posts, read 2,630,968 times
Reputation: 803
Who would want to live in racist ass Boston???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2013, 12:07 PM
 
Location: The city of champions
1,830 posts, read 2,152,122 times
Reputation: 1338
LA>>>>>>>>>>>>SF>>>>>>>>Seattle>Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2013, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Medfid
6,808 posts, read 6,049,019 times
Reputation: 5257
Quote:
Originally Posted by gerrythesnake View Post
Who would want to live in racist ass Boston???
What makes you think that Boston is less tolerant than the other cities?

It seems to me that the fact that black people are fleeing SF and white people are fleeing LA is something of a red flag as far as this comparison goes....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 09:00 AM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,521,087 times
Reputation: 5884
Quote:
Originally Posted by disposable2 View Post
Boston is a small quaint village compared to LA, the 40 sq miles of LA's core is denser, and higher pedestrian activity.
It's only denser b/c it's full of some of the poorest and most uneducated people crammed in squalor of all of LA county. It isn't structurally denser.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 02:15 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,246,328 times
Reputation: 6767
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
It's only denser b/c it's full of some of the poorest and most uneducated people crammed in squalor of all of LA county. It isn't structurally denser.
Some of it is poor but alot of it isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2013, 05:21 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,496,782 times
Reputation: 15184
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
It's only denser b/c it's full of some of the poorest and most uneducated people crammed in squalor of all of LA county. It isn't structurally denser.
If you go by housing unit density, LA is lower but not by much [miles from center/densest neighborhood of city]:



Streets like these pack lots of people regardless of income:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Korea...3.51,,0,-14.87

[most extreme, yes]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top