Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For as big as Boston is it has a very blah downtown no stunning skyscrapers at all. and it seems poor marketing hurts it's image the city is not seen as progressive like it's peers.
We'll agree to disagree here. Boston's downtown is about as far from "blah" as you can get from the street/ pedestrian level. It's a very dense, walkable, vibrant, active core to be in. For me (and most other people), that's far more important than having stunning skyscrapers or a skyline which do little more than serve as aesthetics for people viewing it from a distance. There are many cities in the U.S. that have better skylines but are far more dull to actually walk around. Boston's a great place to be and for me, that's far better than being a great place to look at from 5-10 miles away.
Worst (or among the worst):
- Segregation Issues
- Construction/Condition of Roads
- Combination of Property/State Income/Sales Taxes
- Winter Severity and Overall Length of Season
Trust me, Milwaukee does not take the cake for any of those things.
Los Angeles, Best at food trucks,Weather of course lol,Weed & Women, Burgers & Chinese food,Outdoor sports,Car clubbing, Mall shopping & Entertainment.
Worst @ Gang violence, Homeless citizens, Terrible traffic, Illegal immigration, Police corruption & city transportation.Though not the worst but should have been upgraded by since the early 2000s.At least there's construction for that now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.