Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Most prestigious
Los Angeles 114 44.36%
Chicago 39 15.18%
Washington, DC 44 17.12%
San Francisco 60 23.35%
Voters: 257. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:33 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,438,649 times
Reputation: 354

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Yes indeed.

The first $100 Million home sale in the United States took place in Los Altos Hills, a mansion purchased by a Russian billionaire.

The most expensive home sale in California to THIS DAY remains a $117.5 Million mansion in Woodside, a mansion purchased by a Chinese billionaire.


Apparently tons of people find Bay Area suburbs to be very prestigious.


That just exposes your ignorance.

I know it must pain you to see the absence of Calabasas. LMAO.
You're the most ignorant poster I've seen on any forum.
Go to most of America and ask about those Bay area burbs.
See what happens

 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Watching half my country turn into Gilead
3,530 posts, read 4,179,323 times
Reputation: 2925
@Freddy K, you're arguing with a broken record. This is the same dude that argued the Bay Area as more powerful than Greater New York. Just see his spin for what it is: unrestrained homerism
 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:37 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,438,649 times
Reputation: 354
You remind me of colin kaepernick.
Jim tomsula says, "We're benching you so you can step back and breathe."

Colin answers, "I'm not out of breath".

You're colin.
Clueless.

Hmm..maybe you really are colin.
 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:40 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
You still don't understand what that word means.
Hahaha clearly you are the one who fails to grasp the concept. Where the wealthy and the educated live en masse, those are the most prestigious places, because they usually have the best schools and nicest neighborhoods etc.

Hence we see that even on this front(Suburbs), the Bay Area clearly WHALLOPS Los Angeles when it comes to prestige.
 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:45 PM
 
317 posts, read 378,392 times
Reputation: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by qworldorder View Post
@Freddy K, you're arguing with a broken record. This is the same dude that argued the Bay Area as more powerful than Greater New York. Just see his spin for what it is: unrestrained homerism
Nah...stay out of it. From what I've seen of your posting, you are usually smarter than this to be getting involved in this sort of arguments. It's a Homer move getting involved in a Simpson vs. Griffin fight.
 
Old 11-07-2015, 10:45 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 1,438,649 times
Reputation: 354
It means high status. Not income. I'm from Fairfax County. It's one of the wealthiest counties in the U.S. Yet, there's only a few places that would really be considered "prestigous" areas. Great Falls, Langley, McLean. That's it.

None of those places are like Beverly Hills, Malibu etc. You would have higher status if you say "I'm from Beverly Hills" than "Woodside". Most people wouldnt know what Woodiside is.

I lived in Reston. Not high status. Nobody would be really impressed. But I had cousins in McLean. The reactions were very different.

That's the high status thing.

Last edited by Freddy K; 11-07-2015 at 11:10 PM..
 
Old 11-07-2015, 11:12 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
None of those places are like Beverly Hills, Malibu etc. You would have higher status if you say "I'm from Beverly Hills" than "Woodside". Most people wouldnt know what Woodiside is.
Haha what a joke. Being more famous does not mean more prestigious.

Status is not defined by being more well known, it's defined by being more respected.

Beverly Hills is not more respected than Palo Alto, in fact, no LA suburb can even come close. Palo Alto is home to the most prestigious American university outside of the Northeast, which makes it an intellectual hotbed, Palo Alto is home to Fortune 500 companies and some of the innovative companies in the world, like Tesla Motors, Palo Alto is home to the richest venture capitalists in the world, Palo Alto frequently ranks all by itself in some GAWC reports, is a major hub of finance, science, engineering, etc, and the town is also filthy rich and is has what is widely regarded as the best school district in the state, and so forth.

Beverly Hills is a vapid diversion for brainless people who dont know anything, Palo Alto is a world power by comparison.

Dont talk to me about high status because you are not really knowledgable.
 
Old 11-07-2015, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Watching half my country turn into Gilead
3,530 posts, read 4,179,323 times
Reputation: 2925
Quote:
Originally Posted by cityguy7 View Post
Nah...stay out of it. From what I've seen of your posting, you are usually smarter than this to be getting involved in this sort of arguments. It's a Homer move getting involved in a Simpson vs. Griffin fight.
Point taken I will abstain from this battle, especially on a Saturday night!
 
Old 11-07-2015, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freddy K View Post
You remind me of colin kaepernick.
Jim tomsula says, "We're benching you so you can step back and breathe."

Colin answers, "I'm not out of breath".

You're colin.
Clueless.

Hmm..maybe you really are colin.
Since bigass LA doesnt even have a team, it's no surprise that you know all about ours.
 
Old 11-07-2015, 11:23 PM
 
Location: CA, NC, and currently FL
366 posts, read 404,823 times
Reputation: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Estudiamos View Post
Exactly, I have not heard of those SF burbs either. He didn't link us so he's not telling the truth.
So what though? That's an argument for not being as well known. Being well known doesn't exactly equate to higher quality of life. Wealth on the other is not a bad argument for that and therefore prestige, apart from a mental and philosophical standpoint of course.

It hurts me to use even the same concept as Montclair for a debate, but he has a point in this, in his own little ways of course which is the problem.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top