Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2020, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Tupelo, Ms
2,653 posts, read 2,094,782 times
Reputation: 2124

Advertisements

Mississippi should catch up to Arkansas soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2020, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,487,099 times
Reputation: 21229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
Shocked Texas has not caught California yet.
It's not going to happen so long as the Bay Area GDP by itself is about the same size as TXs 2 largest CSAs combined.

2018
Bay Area CSA GDP $1.031 Trillion
Dallas & Houston CSAs Combined GDP $1.017 Trillion

And 2019 was a banner year for tech giants so...I dont know what to tell you

Source:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2020, 03:22 PM
 
3,332 posts, read 3,692,696 times
Reputation: 2633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texamichiforniasota View Post
I was wondering the same thing about their post- what is impressive about Ohio? It is decidely average in every way related to GDP. It doesn't underperform, but it doesn't overperform either. If you look at ABQalex's list of GDP per capita, there Ohio is, right in the middle, 26/51.
I just find it impressive because Ohio for the most part flies under the radar.. I knew it was high but I thought it would be lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2020, 05:13 PM
 
Location: Cleveland
1,223 posts, read 1,041,473 times
Reputation: 1568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebck120 View Post
I just find it impressive because Ohio for the most part flies under the radar.. I knew it was high but I thought it would be lower.
Its very hi in the middle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2020, 05:27 PM
 
Location: Atlanta metro (Cobb County)
3,150 posts, read 2,206,134 times
Reputation: 4189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharif662 View Post
Mississippi should catch up to Arkansas soon.
Arkansas is on a faster growth track than Mississippi by virtually all metrics that I've seen. Mississippi had the edge in population by about 52,000 in 2010, while by 2019 Arkansas was in front by over 41,000 and growing. Arkansas has higher income and economic productivity levels than Mississippi as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2020, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Tupelo, Ms
2,653 posts, read 2,094,782 times
Reputation: 2124
Quote:
Originally Posted by jas75 View Post
Arkansas is on a faster growth track than Mississippi by virtually all metrics that I've seen. Mississippi had the edge in population by about 52,000 in 2010, while by 2019 Arkansas was in front by over 41,000 and growing. Arkansas has higher income and economic productivity levels than Mississippi as well.
I'm speaking only of economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 07:51 AM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
3,416 posts, read 2,454,235 times
Reputation: 6166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaylord_Focker View Post
Think about what a powerhouse Nova really is? Impressive. Shocked Texas has not caught California yet.
For real?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,514 posts, read 33,519,512 times
Reputation: 12147
I have no clue why people haven’t caught on to what Gaylord attempts to do when he makes comments like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,323 posts, read 5,484,706 times
Reputation: 12280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
I have no clue why people haven’t caught on to what Gaylord attempts to do when he makes comments like that.
#poorattemptattrolling
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-11-2020, 12:17 PM
 
724 posts, read 559,641 times
Reputation: 1040
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
It's not going to happen so long as the Bay Area GDP by itself is about the same size as TXs 2 largest CSAs combined.

2018
Bay Area CSA GDP $1.031 Trillion
Dallas & Houston CSAs Combined GDP $1.017 Trillion

And 2019 was a banner year for tech giants so...I dont know what to tell you

Source:
Jeez, where the heck have I been the last year or two. I feel like 5 years ago, the Bay Area's GDP was matched up with Chicago and DC's. It's pulled away since.

And Boston is fast catching up to Chicago.

But this is for a separate thread as this is about states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top