Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I get that, but we're still talking about several states and Boston is comparable to Atlanta (smaller MSA, larger GDP) which is a de facto regional capital of a larger geographic region.
Boston is a big deal for multiple reasons, but the number of New England states and the size of the region aren’t among of them imo.
States just kept getting bigger and bigger as we moved west. It’d be kind of funny if the government broke the country up into Rhode Island -sized chunks in 2020. Los Angeles County would have to become at least 3 separate states...
Boston is a big deal for multiple reasons, but the number of New England states and the size of the region aren’t among of them imo.
You're misrepresenting what I said, which is that some of Boston's importance derives from its status as a regional capital--even if, as you pointed out, that region is relatively small. We can agree to disagree on this point as it's not that big of a deal.
Status:
"See My Blog Entries for my Top 500 Most Important USA Cities"
(set 5 days ago)
Location: Harrisburg, PA
1,051 posts, read 976,625 times
Reputation: 1406
1. NYC
2. LA
3. Chicago
4. DC
5. SF
6. Boston
7. Philadelphia
8. Houston
9. Atlanta
10. Dallas
11. Miami
12. Seattle
13. Detroit
14. Phoenix
15. Minneapolis
16. Denver
17. San Diego
18. Charlotte
19. Baltimore
20. St. Louis
Reading this thread just confirms the prevailing notion of City Data forum: in the real world of urban geography, urban psychology, informed data collection and analysis, and travel, too many posters here would get laughed out of the building.
That Miami doesn’t have an overwhelming advantage on this poll and didn’t qualify for the top 10 and that Austin is being relegated to 3rd or 4th tier status and being compared with the likes of Albuquerque and Tulsa is an absolute denigration to the respective cities and an embarrassment to the posters.
Last edited by _Uncommon_; 04-29-2020 at 06:02 PM..
In addition I would say the following are also more important than Austin
Orlando
Tampa
New Orleans
Salt Lake City
Honolulu
Las Vegas
Really Austin is a 25-35 city with its peers being
Portland
Oklahoma City
Little Rock
Nashville
Columbus
Kansas City
Cleveland
Indianapolis
Pittsburgh
Sacramento
San Antonio
Jacksonville
Cincinnati
Memphis
Tulsa
Albuquerque
This is getting ridiculous. The hate for Austin is absurd on this site. On the first list, only Tampa and maybe Las Vegas and New Orleans should be listed. The others are a rung below and belong with most of the cities on the second list.
As far as the second list is concerned, OKC, Little Rock, Jacksonville, Memphis, Tulsa, and Albuquerque are EASILY a tier below and should be on a separate rung lower.
Reading this thread just confirms the prevailing notion of City Data forum: in the real world of urban geography, urban psychology, informed data collection and analysis, and travel, too many posters here would get laughed out of the building.
That Miami doesn’t have an overwhelming advantage on this poll and didn’t qualify for the top 10 and that Austin is being relegated to 3rd or 4th tier status and being compared with the likes of Albuquerque and Tulsa is an absolute denigration to the respective cities and an embarrassment to the posters.
I agree with you concerning Austin but not so much regarding Miami for real world reasons I mentioned earlier in the thread.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.