Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Better city at their peaks?
Detroit 72 91.14%
Cleveland 7 8.86%
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-04-2022, 08:28 PM
 
37 posts, read 64,101 times
Reputation: 51

Advertisements

Which was the better city overall during their peak periods in the 1950s: Detroit or Cleveland?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-04-2022, 10:55 PM
 
Location: New York, NY
498 posts, read 354,272 times
Reputation: 641
Detroit for sure
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,549 posts, read 2,341,146 times
Reputation: 3804
Detroit and it’s not even close. At its peak it was the 5th largest city in the nation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 10:48 AM
 
Location: ATL via ROC
1,217 posts, read 2,329,254 times
Reputation: 2578
Detroit at its peak was like the equivalent of an Atlanta or Seattle today. Maybe even bigger/more important than both.

Cleveland was more of a Charlotte or Austin.

It’s not just the population difference (Cleveland dropped off the top 10 list in 1980, Detroit not until 2010). The powerhouse that Detroit was in terms of not only American industry (automotive, manufacturing, logistics) but also the cultural impact with Motown, labor unions and so forth cannot be overstated.

Cleveland is a city that, unlike most, I actually love. It just wasn’t nearly at the same level as Detroit at the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 11:56 AM
 
Location: OC
12,855 posts, read 9,595,244 times
Reputation: 10641
Detroit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Odenton, MD
3,549 posts, read 2,341,146 times
Reputation: 3804
Quote:
Originally Posted by 585WNY View Post
Detroit at its peak was like the equivalent of an Atlanta or Seattle today. Maybe even bigger/more important than both.

Cleveland was more of a Charlotte or Austin.

It’s not just the population difference (Cleveland dropped off the top 10 list in 1980, Detroit not until 2010). The powerhouse that Detroit was in terms of not only American industry (automotive, manufacturing, logistics) but also the cultural impact with Motown, labor unions and so forth cannot be overstated.

Cleveland is a city that, unlike most, I actually love. It just wasn’t nearly at the same level as Detroit at the top.
Detroit at its peak would have been the equivalent of todays SF or DC. In 1920 only NYC, Philly & Chicago we’re larger and the next closest cities were ~1/2 it’s size.

By the 1950’s LA caught Detroit and it slid to 5th.

Cleveland peaked later and was in dead heat with St. Louis and Baltimore in the 1940-1950’s and they along with Cinnci & Pittsburgh would have economically been equivalent to todays Seattle, Philly, Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, etc..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 02:51 PM
 
4,537 posts, read 5,115,684 times
Reputation: 4858
Quote:
Originally Posted by 585WNY View Post
Detroit at its peak was like the equivalent of an Atlanta or Seattle today. Maybe even bigger/more important than both.

Cleveland was more of a Charlotte or Austin.

It’s not just the population difference (Cleveland dropped off the top 10 list in 1980, Detroit not until 2010). The powerhouse that Detroit was in terms of not only American industry (automotive, manufacturing, logistics) but also the cultural impact with Motown, labor unions, and so forth cannot be overstated.

Cleveland is a city that, unlike most, I actually love. It just wasn’t nearly at the same level as Detroit at the top.
I guess the OP means peak power or prestige (it's not well-defined). In that case, you've got to go with Detroit. Detroit peaked at over 2M, (Cleveland's top counted population was 914K) not to mention the international prestige of being associated with the automobile, which changed personal movement forever (even though the auto was conceived and perfected elsewhere, Detroit gets the credit, in part, because of Henry Ford's creation of the moving assembly line). And yes, Motown is also a larger cultural icon than anything associated with Cleveland. I wouldn't say labor unions so much. Yes, Detroit has somewhat the edge because of UAW, but Cleveland has a history as a strong union town (which is why Sylvester Stalone's movie F.I.S.T., a fictionalization of actual labor unrest in the 1930s, was set in Cleveland). One of Cleveland's "problems" culturally, is its greater diversification commercially and culturally, while Detroit has been more mono-focused on the auto industry and its spinoffs, including labor unions. Even Motown is kind of an auto industry spinoff, as famed creator Barry Gordy was a musician who worked on the Ford assembly line and, in fact, transferred Ford's Quality Control approach to his fledgling music/record business which was a large factor in Motown's great success.

Your comparison of Austin or Charlotte doesn't make sense to me and misses the mark. Those cities, which are at their peaks, are more comparable to Cleveland now, but when Cleveland was at its peak, it was the 6th largest city in the country -- in the 1920s through the 50s. Neither Charlotte nor Austin is anywhere near that ranking today, size-wise. Also, while Detroit does beat out Cleveland for the Big 3 auto industry, Cleveland was a central city to the Industrial Age, as Standard Oil, Sherwin-Williams, Peerless Motorcars, Republic Steel, Eaton, Warner and Swasey, TRW and Kirby vacuum cleaners, among others, were founded in Cleveland. Cleveland was, and still is, well known in industrial circles for the manufacture of gears and other machine parts -- but that can't hold a candle to cars.

And now, of course, we have the massive, internationally famous Cleveland Clinic. But none of those really stand out in the public psyche except, maybe, Standard Oil, whose HQ was merged out of Cleveland (into BP and then Standard of Indiana in Chicago) in the 1980s. Most people don't realize Sherwin-Williams was founded in the CLE and still resides there (and is currently building a new office tower/complex in the center of town).

Neither Austin nor Charlotte has reached that level of national importance even though both are now slightly larger than the Cleveland metro-area-wise.

Last edited by TheProf; 11-05-2022 at 03:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 03:10 PM
 
323 posts, read 261,703 times
Reputation: 832
At their peaks, Detroit.

Today, Cleveland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Southern California suburb
376 posts, read 210,806 times
Reputation: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarcBetrus View Post
At their peaks, Detroit.

Today, Cleveland.

Just curious, what would be the reasons why Cleveland would be higher on the ladder than Detroit today?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2022, 06:27 PM
 
Location: La Jolla
4,226 posts, read 3,309,497 times
Reputation: 4149
Quote:
Originally Posted by 585WNY View Post
Detroit at its peak was like the equivalent of an Atlanta or Seattle today. Maybe even bigger/more important than both.

Cleveland was more of a Charlotte or Austin.

It’s not just the population difference (Cleveland dropped off the top 10 list in 1980, Detroit not until 2010). The powerhouse that Detroit was in terms of not only American industry (automotive, manufacturing, logistics) but also the cultural impact with Motown, labor unions and so forth cannot be overstated.

Cleveland is a city that, unlike most, I actually love. It just wasn’t nearly at the same level as Detroit at the top.
In 1950 Detroit wouid have easily been the 5th largest metro area in the nation, and probably very near the top in some measures of wealth.

In terms of national significance, I'd put 1950 Cleveland somewhere above the Seattle and below the Atlanta of today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top