Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What city makes the best Mexican food?
San Diego 67 9.88%
Los Angeles 173 25.52%
Pheonix 24 3.54%
Las Vegas 2 0.29%
Alburqurque 85 12.54%
Dallas 73 10.77%
San Anotonio 97 14.31%
Dallas/Fort Worth 11 1.62%
Houston 58 8.55%
Other 88 12.98%
Voters: 678. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-05-2023, 09:29 PM
 
4,344 posts, read 2,803,077 times
Reputation: 5273

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
You are wasting your time, because I don't understand your point here. At no point did I say cumin was a result of American influences, and I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. There was some serious miscommunication there. Tex-Mex is a distinct cuisine created in the United States. In the early 1800s perhaps the cuisine in Texas was pretty much indistinguishable from that in parts of Coahuila or Chihuahua, but in the almost two centuries spent apart and the very different migration patterns, policies, and economies, they've differed quite a bit at least in regards to what's generally considered Tex-Mex.
Good luck. In today's world people get stuck on talking points and just run with it and everything, no matter how well reasoned, is dumb. Combined with the big-headed nature of some Texans, you just seem to be just running into a brick-wall. Reason just can't get passed that Texas ego. (And I consider myself a Texan so I can say that).

The talking point lately is that President Polk grabbed a hold of that border and tossed it into Mexico, and then Texas was its own country and its so unique, Yada Yada (ignore the dozen other republics, and forget Hawaii was its own freaking kingdom).

His theory is that Texas being part of Mexico for like 12 minutes, and Mexico didn't really want anything to do with it so barely populated it, and because of those strong ties from waaaaay back then, it is somehow can be considered a region of Mexico, and TexMex, although created in Texas long after it became a state, can be unquestionably called authentic fir no other reason than 200 years ago Texas was Mexico for 12 minutes.

There is no denying that Creole food is American, and a ton of those styles were created from the early 1700s. A century before Louisiana became a state.

It is even worse looking at Cajun Country. That part of the state of Louisiana was not part of the Louisiana Purchase, so I guess Cajun food, by his standards isn't American, it is Mexican.

I don't think what country a part of the US was in long long ago matters much. It is what influence it is under nowadays. TexMex is still Mexican food just as Chinese American food is still Chinese food. Both are just not AUTHENTIC Mexican or Chinese in most uses of the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-05-2023, 09:46 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
Good luck. In today's world people get stuck on talking points and just run with it and everything, no matter how well reasoned, is dumb. Combined with the big-headed nature of some Texans, you just seem to be just running into a brick-wall. Reason just can't get passed that Texas ego. (And I consider myself a Texan so I can say that).

The talking point lately is that President Polk grabbed a hold of that border and tossed it into Mexico, and then Texas was its own country and its so unique, Yada Yada (ignore the dozen other republics, and forget Hawaii was its own freaking kingdom).

His theory is that Texas being part of Mexico for like 12 minutes, and Mexico didn't really want anything to do with it so barely populated it, and because of those strong ties from waaaaay back then, it is somehow can be considered a region of Mexico, and TexMex, although created in Texas long after it became a state, can be unquestionably called authentic fir no other reason than 200 years ago Texas was Mexico for 12 minutes.

There is no denying that Creole food is American, and a ton of those styles were created from the early 1700s. A century before Louisiana became a state.

It is even worse looking at Cajun Country. That part of the state of Louisiana was not part of the Louisiana Purchase, so I guess Cajun food, by his standards isn't American, it is Mexican.

I don't think what country a part of the US was in long long ago matters much. It is what influence it is under nowadays. TexMex is still Mexican food just as Chinese American food is still Chinese food. Both are just not AUTHENTIC Mexican or Chinese in most uses of the word.
Maybe--I think there's a lot of grey area here, so I'm fine with debating things, though I don't understand some of the jumps being made to argue against things that I don't think I've actually said.

I think for Tex Mex and American Chinese food, I myself wouldn't use the word authentic or inauthentic to describe them and my first attribution to where they're from wouldn't be Mexico or China, but rather American. The interesting thing about both of these to me is that continuing immigration often puts these in an odd push and pull of taking additional influences as well as new arrivals sometimes placing a bit of scorn on these as not authentic though I think there's a good argument for them being simply different and cuisines of their own rather than a (lesser) bowdlerization of something else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2023, 10:09 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,851 posts, read 2,167,272 times
Reputation: 3012
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
Why would anyone want to eat chapulines

Edit: I stand corrected, I did a map search for restaurants that serve it, and there's a ton in Houston. Gross

Edit 2: I searched which restaurants served the best chapulines. The highest restaurant on the list actually in Mexico was third lol. https://www.tasteatlas.com/chapulines/wheretoeat
The only proper ones are served of plastic bags in certain parts of Mexico City.
Not all of the restaurants that show up in google searches have them, or have them consistently. The ones they serve in Hugo's tasted pretty bland to me. Haven't tried Xochi's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Oklahoma
17,778 posts, read 13,673,847 times
Reputation: 17810
Quote:
Originally Posted by atadytic19 View Post
Good luck. In today's world people get stuck on talking points and just run with it and everything, no matter how well reasoned, is dumb. Combined with the big-headed nature of some Texans, you just seem to be just running into a brick-wall. Reason just can't get passed that Texas ego. (And I consider myself a Texan so I can say that).



His theory is that Texas being part of Mexico for like 12 minutes, and Mexico didn't really want anything to do with it so barely populated it, and because of those strong ties from waaaaay back then, it is somehow can be considered a region of Mexico, and TexMex, although created in Texas long after it became a state, can be unquestionably called authentic fir no other reason than 200 years ago Texas was Mexico for 12 minutes.
Had to smile at the first paragraph.

My question is whether it is possible that Tex Mex food actually originated in Texas and then found it's way to northern Mexico over the years.

I'm going to assume that it was probably people of Mexican descent who first came up with Tex Mex dishes as opposed to a bunch of gringos sitting around a campfire in San Angelo. So it stands to reason that the dishes might have migrated back across the border. Just speculating though.

You called Tex Mex "comfort food" and in my experience with Mexican food in the places I've eaten it... if you just want to get full... I mean sprawled out on the couch nappin' after eatin' full... Tex Mex is the way to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 08:52 AM
 
Location: East Bay, San Francisco Bay Area
23,518 posts, read 24,000,129 times
Reputation: 23946
I originally answered this thread in 2013. I still think LA has excellent Mexican food, but I’ve also had excellent Mexican food in El Centro, San Diego, Dallas, El Paso, Phoenix, Austin, San Francisco, San Jose, Oakland, Watsonville, Albuquerque, etc.

I’ve tried every type of restaurant from small, unassuming taco stands to nice restaurants.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ccm123 View Post
Los Angeles, hands down. For flavor, variety and price.

Last edited by ccm123; 07-06-2023 at 10:22 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 09:32 AM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,861 posts, read 6,574,356 times
Reputation: 6399
Possible trip to Mexico City later this year. Anyone have any recommendations there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
Possible trip to Mexico City later this year. Anyone have any recommendations there?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxTkQsytr5o&t=153s
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 01:28 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,127 posts, read 39,357,090 times
Reputation: 21212
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie gein View Post
Had to smile at the first paragraph.

My question is whether it is possible that Tex Mex food actually originated in Texas and then found it's way to northern Mexico over the years.

I'm going to assume that it was probably people of Mexican descent who first came up with Tex Mex dishes as opposed to a bunch of gringos sitting around a campfire in San Angelo. So it stands to reason that the dishes might have migrated back across the border. Just speculating though.

You called Tex Mex "comfort food" and in my experience with Mexican food in the places I've eaten it... if you just want to get full... I mean sprawled out on the couch nappin' after eatin' full... Tex Mex is the way to go.

There's definitely been a lot of back and forth border crossing, though Tex Mex to some degree was shaped by having a lot of non-Mexican audiences and their tastes. That being said, a lot of stuff from the US makes it across the border to become quite popular. Hamburgers are quite common as are chips and soda is everywhere. Chains like McDonald's, Burger King, Domino's, KFC, etc. do fairly well throughout Mexico.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
Possible trip to Mexico City later this year. Anyone have any recommendations there?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post

Yea! Contramar is very good as is its sister restaurant Entremar. CDMX has some very fancy restaurants and of the two most commonly mentioned, I prefer Pujol to Quintonil. A different era of formal dining is Nicos which seems like it'd be an old guard French restaurant, which it is to some extent, but it has a lot of local cuisine and its ant eggs are really delicious and not just an odd novelty. I found a lot of random corner taquerias and the like that were good as well and especially like eating in stalls at local neighborhood markets like in Mercado Medellin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2023, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,851 posts, read 2,167,272 times
Reputation: 3012
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
Yea! Contramar is very good as is its sister restaurant Entremar. CDMX has some very fancy restaurants and of the two most commonly mentioned, I prefer Pujol to Quintonil. A different era of formal dining is Nicos which seems like it'd be an old guard French restaurant, which it is to some extent, but it has a lot of local cuisine and its ant eggs are really delicious and not just an odd novelty. I found a lot of random corner taquerias and the like that were good as well and especially like eating in stalls at local neighborhood markets like in Mercado Medellin.
Agreed that random street stalls often have good eats. Only pick ones with lines.
I always say 'sin cilantro y lechuga' just to be on the safe side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2023, 12:15 AM
 
828 posts, read 647,741 times
Reputation: 973
My top tier list (in order):

Los Angeles, San Diego, Tucson, Houston, San Antonio, Chicago,

Dallas, Phoenix, Austin just below
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top