Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Neither are that impressive but I would go with ATL. Charlotte just doesnt do it for me. Plue Char skyline just doesnt seem that dense which is why ATL gets my vote. 2nd picture of ATL is a good one.
Status:
"Pickleball-Free American"
(set 2 days ago)
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,464 posts, read 44,074,708 times
Reputation: 16840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brickmama
Neither are that impressive but I would go with ATL. Charlotte just doesnt do it for me. Plue Char skyline just doesnt seem that dense which is why ATL gets my vote. 2nd picture of ATL is a good one.
I guess it's hard to keep 'em down on the farm once they've been to St. Louis.
Neither are that impressive but I would go with ATL. Charlotte just doesnt do it for me. Plue Char skyline just doesnt seem that dense which is why ATL gets my vote. 2nd picture of ATL is a good one.
LOL LOL LOL!!! Two top 20 American skylines are not impressive.
No reason to bash me, its just my opinion. There is nothing unique about neither skyline. If they werent labeled you could easily get them confused with most other skyline in the U.S. When it come to judging skylines I focus on density not height and I dont think either are that dense. However looks can be decieving and it may be different at ground level.
I think they are comparable. With Charlottes new scraper going up, I might give it the edge but only by a inch. I would have to say Atlanta has more infill though.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.