Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:25 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976

Advertisements

In reading these forums it seems there are many criteria to compare city sizes; MSA seems too large let alone CSA and the borders of cities are so drastically different. To me urban seems to be a continuous area with a density above 10,000 ppsm but again I know many people would differ. What I find interesting is relative land area and population comparisons.

Below is my point (and I choose a couple of places to compare to my home town)


Philadelphia: 1.5 mil people over 143 sq miles = density of 10,612 ppsm
Atlanta: .54mi people over 132 sq miles = density of 4,082 ppsm


Philadelphia & Delaware County: 2.1 mil people over 334 sq miles = 6,193 ppsm
Dallas 1.3 mil people over 385 sq miles = 3,698 ppsm


Philadelphia, Delaware County and Camden County: 2.6 mil over 562 sq miles = 4,600 ppsm
Houston: 2.2 mil people over 600 sq miles = 3,667 ppsm

It just seems really hard to compare areas of different population concentration.

Does anyone have any thoughts or a better metric?

Last edited by kidphilly; 04-12-2010 at 01:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Cleveland bound with MPLS in the rear-view
5,509 posts, read 11,872,410 times
Reputation: 2501
What about a radius? 5 miles from downtown, 10 miles, etc. For cities like Miami and Chicago you can maybe make an exception to cover the same square mileage as a city that doesn't have geographical boundaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 01:48 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by west336 View Post
What about a radius? 5 miles from downtown, 10 miles, etc. For cities like Miami and Chicago you can maybe make an exception to cover the same square mileage as a city that doesn't have geographical boundaries.

That makes sense; wish there were a site that made this a little less cumbersome to calculate
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:09 PM
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,452 posts, read 44,061,014 times
Reputation: 16804
I was thinking that density breakdown by zip code might give you a better picture of population distribution in a particular city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:38 PM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,375 posts, read 20,791,845 times
Reputation: 9982
Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinDecatur View Post
I was thinking that density breakdown by zip code might give you a better picture of population distribution in a particular city.
So, in other words, like this?
Los Angeles:Is there a best way to determine comparative city population-la.jpg

Vs

Dallas: Is there a best way to determine comparative city population-dallas.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:56 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,099,045 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
In reading these forums it seems there are many criteria to compare city sizes; MSA seems too large let alone CSA and the borders of cities are so drastically different. To me urban seems to be a continuous area with a density above 10,000 ppsm but again I know many people would differ. What I find interesting is relative land area and population comparisons.

Below is my point (and I choose a couple of places to compare to my home town)


Philadelphia: 1.5 mil people over 143 sq miles = density of 10,612 ppsm
Atlanta: .54mi people over 132 sq miles = density of 4,082 ppsm


Philadelphia & Delaware County: 2.1 mil people over 334 sq miles = 6,193 ppsm
Dallas 1.3 mil people over 385 sq miles = 3,698 ppsm


Philadelphia, Delaware County and Camden County: 2.6 mil over 562 sq miles = 4,600 ppsm
Houston: 2.2 mil people over 600 sq miles = 3,667 ppsm

It just seems really hard to compare areas of different population concentration.

Does anyone have any thoughts or a better metric?
Two major cities can be in the same MSA like Dallas and FT Worth. No major city is stilling from Philly if New York was really integrated in the same social commuting region as Philly, it would be the New York- Philadelphia Metroplex. MSA represents commuting ties with a city or cities. If a city has a large city limit area it’s because the city annex! If a city has a larger Metro Area it’s because that city is the core of a larger social and economic integrated region. You can't take that way from that city density doesn’t matter. Atlanta commuting population is 62.4% over the resident population. You say some MSA seems too large, well the traffic say different that’s why sunbelt cities Freeways look the way they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:00 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike0421 View Post
So, in other words, like this?
Los Angeles:Attachment 61185

Vs

Dallas: Attachment 61186

I like the heat maps, though the densest (>1,000) concentration doesn't really demonstrate density or urbanity very well; it seems these maps might benefit from a few more density levels, potentially >5,000 (nearly urban) and >10,000 urban
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,199,026 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
In reading these forums it seems there are many criteria to compare city sizes; MSA seems too large let alone CSA and the borders of cities are so drastically different. To me urban seems to be a continuous area with a density above 10,000 ppsm but again I know many people would differ. What I find interesting is relative land area and population comparisons.

Below is my point (and I choose a couple of places to compare to my home town)


Philadelphia: 1.5 mil people over 143 sq miles = density of 10,612 ppsm
Atlanta: .54mi people over 132 sq miles = density of 4,082 ppsm


Philadelphia & Delaware County: 2.1 mil people over 334 sq miles = 6,193 ppsm
Dallas 1.3 mil people over 385 sq miles = 3,698 ppsm





Philadelphia, Delaware County and Camden County: 2.6 mil over 562 sq miles = 4,600 ppsm
Houston: 2.2 mil people over 600 sq miles = 3,667 ppsm

It just seems really hard to compare areas of different population concentration.

Does anyone have any thoughts or a better metric?
That's not a good way of looking at it though; regardless of size it's about commuting patterns and influence. Dallas, Atlanta, and Houston influence a greater area than Philadelphia (Blame NYC for that).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:25 PM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,895,654 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiatldal View Post
Two major cities can be in the same MSA like Dallas and FT Worth. No major city is stilling from Philly if New York was really integrated in the same social commuting region as Philly, it would be the New York- Philadelphia Metroplex. MSA represents commuting ties with a city or cities. If a city has a large city limit area it’s because the city annex! If a city has a larger Metro Area it’s because that city is the core of a larger social and economic integrated region. You can't take that way from that city density doesn’t matter. Atlanta commuting population is 62.4% over the resident population. You say some MSA seems too large, well the traffic say different that’s why sunbelt cities Freeways look the way they do.

You have a point; Dallas to Ft Worth is 35 miles and Philly to NYC is 46 miles
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:30 PM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,375 posts, read 20,791,845 times
Reputation: 9982
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
I like the heat maps, though the densest (>1,000) concentration doesn't really demonstrate density or urbanity very well; it seems these maps might benefit from a few more density levels, potentially >5,000 (nearly urban) and >10,000 urban
I put in an extra classification for over 5k:

LA:Is there a best way to determine comparative city population-la2.jpg

Dallas:Is there a best way to determine comparative city population-dallas2.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top